Fossil food: landed property as a hidden abode of global warming

References

• Akram-Lodhi, H., Kay, C., & Borras, S. (2010). The political economy of land and the Agrarian question in an era of neoliberal globalization. In H. Akram-Lodhi, & C. Kay (Eds.), Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation and the Agrarian question. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, H. (2021). The ties that bind? Agroecology and the agrarian question in the twenty-first century. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(4), 687–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1923010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajl, M. (2021). A People’s Green New Deal. Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Alami, I. (2022). The spiral of state capitalism: labour transformations or the ‘whip of external necessity’? Global Political Economy, 1–20. published online ahead of print, 25 November, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1332/XBQC5746
   Google Scholar
• Aldana-Cohen, D. (2020). Confronting the urban climate emergency: Critical urban studies in the age of a green new deal. City, 24(1-2), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1739435
   Google Scholar
• Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2021). Of economic whips and political necessities: a contribution to the international political economy of uneven and combined development. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 34(2), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1818690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2020). Who are the super-exploited? Gender, race and the intersectional potentialities of dependency theory. In A. Madariaga, & S. Palestini (Eds.) Dependent capitalisms in contemporary Latin America and Europe (pp. 101–130). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arboleda, M., & Purcell, T. (2022). The rentierization of food: Regimes of property and the making of Chile’s globalized agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies, published online ahead of print 27 June 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, J. (2010). On difference and capital: Gender and the globalization of production. Signs, 36(1), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1086/652912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa Cavalcanti, J. S., Cerda Becker, C., & Silva de Almeida, C. (2021). Precariedad, trabajo y reproducción: el trabajo de las mujeres en el sector exportador de uva en Chile y Brasil. Revista Cuhso, 31(1), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.7770/cuhso.v31i1.2003
   Google Scholar
• Barca, E. (2020). Forces of reproduction: Notes for a counter-hegemonic anthropocene. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bárcena, A., & Torres, M. (2019). Del estructuralismo al neoestructuralismo: la travesía intelectual de Orlando Sunkel. CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Bernes, J. (2018). The belly of the revolution: Agriculture, energy, and the future of communism. In B. Bellamy, & J. Diamanti (Eds.), Materialism and the critique of energy (pp. 331–375). MCM.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. (2021). Colonial global economy: Towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, T. (2017). (ed) Social reproduction Theory: remapping class, recentering oppression. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bruinsma, J. (2009). The resource outlook to 2050: By how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? [Paper presentation]. FAO Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, H. J. (2021). Ending fossil fuels: Why net zero is not enough. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, D., & Lawrence, G. (2009). Towards a third food regime: behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9219-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H., Dietz, K., & Warnecke-Berger, H. (2021). Dependency, Rent, and the Failure of Neo-Extractivism. In A. Madariaga,& S. Palestini, (Eds.), Dependent capitalisms in contemporary Latin America and Europe (pp. 207–230). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caligaris, G. (2015). ‘ Concentración y centralización del capital agrario en la región pampeana. El caso de los grandes pooles de siembra. Mundo Agrario, 16(31)abril, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (2003) [1969]. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. (2018). Rethinking the Agrarian question: Agriculture and underdevelopment in the global South. Journal of Agrarian Change, 18(4), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceddia, M. G., Sedlacek, S., Bardsley, N. O., & Gomez-y-Paloma (2013). Sustainable agricultural intensification or Jevons paradox? The role of public governance in tropical South America. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEPAL. (2019). La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe. United Nations
   Google Scholar
• Chua, C., Danyluk, M., Cowen, D., & Khalili, L. (2018). Introduction: Turbulent circulation: Building a critical engagement with logistics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(4), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818783101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., Newell, P., & Brent, Z. (2018). The global political economy of climate change, agriculture and food systems. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1381602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronil, F. (1997). The magical state: Nature, money, and modernity in Venezuela. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F. N., & Leip, A. (2021). Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food, 2(3), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deciancio, M., & Quiliconi, C. (2020). Widening the ‘global conversation’: Highlighting the voices of IPE in the Global South. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 9(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.726271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Filippo, A., & Jadue, S. (1976). La heterogeneidad estructural: Concepto y dimensiones. El Trimestre Económico, 43(169), 167–214.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. The American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunaway, W. (2014). (ed) Gendered Commodity Chains: Seeing Women’s Work and Households in Global Production. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Féliz, M. (2019). ‘ Neodevelopmentalism and dependency in twenty-first century Argentina: Insights from the work of Ruy Mauro Marini. Latin American Perspectives, 46(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18806588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S., & McNally, D. (2015). Precarious migrants: Gender, race, and the social reproduction of a global working class. Socialist Register, 51, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2017). The future of food and agriculture—Trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• França, F., Solar, R., Lees, A., Martins, L. P., Berenguer, E., & Barlow, J. (2021). Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil’s deforestation: A response to 'Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears. Land Use Policy, 108, 105195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2016). Behind Marx’s hidden abode: For an expanded conception of capitalism. New Left Review, 86, 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2021). Climates of capital. New Left Review, 127, 94–127.
   Google Scholar
• Giller, D. (2020). Espectros dependentistas: Variaciones sobre “la teoría de la dependencia” y los marxismos latinoamericanos. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, N. (2015). On the Brazilian ground-rent appropriated by landowners. Revista de Economia Política, 35(4), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572015v35n04a07
   Google Scholar
• Hamant, O. (2020). Plant scientists can’t ignore Jevons paradox anymore. Nature Plants, 6(7), 720–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0722-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, C., Zhao, H., Qin, Y., Burney, J. A., Pongratz, J., Hartung, K., Liu, Y., Moore, F. C., Jackson, R. B., Zhang, Q., & Davis, S. J. (2022). Land-use emissions embodied in international trade. Science (New York, N.Y.), 376(6593), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj1572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. (2022a). Climate change as class war: Building socialism on a warming planet. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. (2022b). Resource Geography III: Rentier natures and the renewal of class struggle. Progress in Human Geography, 46(4), 1095–1105. published online ahead of print, 27 January 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221074006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iñigo Carrera, J. (2007). La Formación Económica de la Sociedad Argentina. Imago Mundi.
   Google Scholar
• Iñigo Carrera, J. (2018). Precios, productividad y renta de la tierra agraria: Ni “términos de intercambio deteriorados” ni “intercambio desigual.” Realidad Económica, 317(47), 41–78.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES-Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2019). Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Irarrázaval, F. (2022). Mobilising rents: Natural gas production networks and the landlord state in Peru and Bolivia. Antipode, 54(3), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. S. (1866). The coal question; an inquiry concerning the progress of the nation and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kanai, J. (2016). The pervasiveness of neoliberal territorial design: Cross-border infrastructure planning in South America. Geoforum, 69, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C. (1991). Reflections on the Latin American contribution to development theory. Development and Change, 22(1), 31–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1991.tb00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvangraven, I. H., & Kesar, S. (2022). Standing in the way of rigor? Economics’ meeting with the globalization agenda. Review of International Political Economy, 1–26. published online ahead of print 9 November, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2131597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leguizamón, A. (2014). Modifying Argentina: GM soy and socio-environmental change. Geoforum, 53, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowder, S. K., Jakob, S., & Raney, T. (2016). The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development, 87, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, A. (2012). China as chimney of the world: The fossil capital hypothesis. Organization & Environment, 25(2), 146–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612449338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, A. (2016). Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, E. (1980) [1972]. Late capitalism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. (1991) [1973]. Dialéctica de la dependencia. Ediciones Era.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1991) [1894]. Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 3). Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, A., Newman, S., & Stevano, S. (2021). ‘Feminist political economies of work and social reproduction.’ Review of International Political Economy, 29(6), 1783–1803.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M. (2014). [1986]Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2019). Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1511448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojeda, D. (2020). ‘El punto ciego de la propiedad: género, tierra y despojo en América Latina.’ Trace, 81, 106–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ojeda, D. (2021). Social reproduction, dispossession, and the gendered workings of agrarian extractivism in Colombia. In B. McKay, A. Alonso-Fradejas, & A. Ezquerro-Cañete (Eds.), Agrarian extractivism in Latin America (pp. 85–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G., & Hecht, S. (2016). Sacred groves, sacrifice zones and soy production: Globalization, intensification and neo-nature in South America. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(2), 251–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1146705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2021). Climate change and international political economy: between collapse and transformation. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelicice, F. P., & Castello, L. (2021). A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 31(5), 1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, P., & Fernández, R. J. (2018). ‘Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) 115(10)March, 2335–2340. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717072115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2011). Informality, global production networks and the dynamics of ‘adverse incorporation. Global Networks, 11(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, T. F. (2017). ‘The political economy of rentier capitalism and the limits to agrarian transformation in Venezuela.’ Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(2), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, T. F., & Martinez, E. (2018). ‘Post-neoliberal energy modernity and the political economy of the landlord state in Ecuador.’ Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, T., & Berdegué, J. (2002). The rapid rise of supermarkets in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities for development. Development Policy Review, 20(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00178
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J., & Arceo, N. (2006). Renta agraria y ganancias extraordinarias en Argentina, 1990–2003. Centro de Estudios Para el Desarrollo Argentina. Documento de Trabajo N°04.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. (2010). From metabolic rift to “metabolic value”: Reflections on environmental sociology and the alternative globalization movement. Organization & Environment, 23(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026610372134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. (2012). Green economy or green Utopia? Rio + 20 and the reproductive labor class. Journal of World-Systems Research, 18(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2012.468
   Google Scholar
• Silva Junior, C. H. L., Pessôa, A. C. M., Carvalho, N. S., Reis, J. B. C., Anderson, L. O., & Aragão, L. (2021). The Brazilian Amazon deforestation rate in 2020 is the greatest of the decade. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(2), 144–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01368-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starosta, G., Caligaris, G., & Fitzsimons, A. L. (2022). ‘A missing link in the Agrarian Question: the role of groundrent and landed property in capital accumulation. The case of Argentina (1993-2019).’ Journal of Peasant Studies, published online ahead of print 1 September 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, K. (2021). Beyond crisis? Using rent theory to understand the restructuring of publicly funded seniors’ care in British Columbia, Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 0308518X2098315. published online ahead of print, 25 January 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20983152
   Google Scholar
• Sunkel, O. (1972). Capitalismo transnacional y desintegración nacional en América Latina. Ediciones Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Sunkel, O. (1978). La dependencia y la heterogeneidad estructural. El Trimestre Económico, 45(177), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Teubal, M. (2004). Rise and collapse of neoliberalism in Argentina: The role of economic groups. Journal of Developing Societies, 20(3-4), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X04050957
   Google Scholar
• Tussie, D., & Chagas-Bastos, F. H. (2022). Misrecognised, misfit and misperceived: Why not a Latin American school of IPE? Review of International Political Economy, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2056902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdés, X. (2015). Feminización del empleo y trabajo precario en las agriculturas latinoamericanas globalizadas. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, 41, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Vennet, B., Schneider, S., & Dessein, J. (2016). Different farming styles behind the homogenous soy production in southern Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(2), 396–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.993319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. (2020). Latin America in the vortex of social change: Development and social movement dynamics. World Development, 130, 104916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth, D., Aldana-Cohen, D., & Angelo, H. (2016). Expand the frontiers of urban sustainability. Nature, 536(7617), 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/536391a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walenta, J. (2021). The making of the corporate carbon footprint: The politics behind emissions scoping. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1935297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar