Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: a survey self-report of Spanish teachers

References

• Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. J. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=3
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 199–214. doi:10.1080/09695941003696172
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48, 12–19.10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 186–203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_210.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Self- and peer-assessment and taking responsibility: The science student’s role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 83, 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71, 425–440. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1447-610.1007/s11336-006-1447-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529–549. doi:10.1007/BF0013874610.1007/BF00138746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 941–956. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.769198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (in press). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Education Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452218649
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Michaelides, M. (2011). Ecological rationality in teachers’ conceptions of assessment across samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 319–337. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0052-310.1007/s10212-010-0052-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Rachor, R. A. (1995). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159–179. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0302_310.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2005). Formative assessment in the secondary classroom. Abingdon: Hodder Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. Curriculum Journal, 16, 137–151. doi:10.1080/0958517050013592110.1080/09585170500135921
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, H. R., Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2011). Enacting assessment for learning: The beliefs practice nexus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 365–379. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.526587
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350. doi:10.1080/0307507991233137993510.1080/03075079912331379935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 343–367.10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529.10.1080/00273170701382864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (Vol. 2, pp. 471–499). Washington, DC: APA.10.1037/13274-000
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, H. W. (1996). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment (Doctoral dissertation). (57), ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., Lawrence, F. R., & Nevitt, J. (2000). Type I error and power of latent mean methods and MANOVA in factorially invariant and noninvariant latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7, 534–556. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.00810.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, M. P. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322. doi:10.2307/334561410.2307/3345614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, D., Mayenga, C., & Gambell, T. (2006). Classroom assessment tools and uses: Canadian English teachers’ practices for writing. Assessing Writing, 11, 42–65.10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Ion, G., & Cano, E. (2011). Assessment practices at Spanish universities: From a learning to a competencies approach. Evaluation & Research in Education, 24, 167–181. doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.610503
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, E. A. (2000). A case study of assessment in a grade 10 English course. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 276–286. doi:10.1080/0022067000959871910.1080/00220670009598719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (1995). Student self-evaluation processes in student-centred teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2, 145–163.10.1080/0969594950020203
   Google Scholar
• Lam, T., & Klockars, A. J. (1982). Anchor point effects on the equivalence of questionnaire items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 317–322.10.1111/jedm.1982.19.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasonen, J. (1995). A case study of student self-assessment in upper secondary education. Jyvaskyla: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyvaskyla.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341.10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. doi:10.1080/0307507060057209010.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 61–75.10.1007/BF02505025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013a). Revisión sobre autoevaluación educativa: evidencia empírica de su implementación a través de la autocalificación sin criterios de evaluación, rúbricas y guiones [Review on educational self-assessment: Empirical evidence of its implementation via self-grading without assessment criteria, rubrics and scripts]. Revista de Investigación en Educación [Journal of Research in Education], 11, 172–197.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013b). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11, 551–576. doi:10.14204/ejrep.30.1220010.14204/ejrep
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806–813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.00710.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.00110.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.00210.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance, self-efficacy and calibration. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21, 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
   Google Scholar
• Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 18–41. doi:10.4219/jaa-2008-869
   Google Scholar
• Remesal, A. (2007). Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: The Spanish instance, building upon Black and Wiliam (2005). Curriculum Journal, 18, 27–38. doi:10.1080/0958517070129213310.1080/09585170701292133
   Google Scholar
• Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 472–482. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.01710.1016/j.tate.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5–6 mathematics effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8, 43–58.10.1207/S15326977EA0801_03
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
   Google Scholar
• Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. (2012). Student self-assessment. Assessment, learning and empowerment. Singapore: Research Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, R. W. (2002). Using self-assessment for evaluation. English Teaching Forum, 40, 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar