The effects of key demographic variables on markers’ perceived ease of use and acceptance of onscreen marking

References

• Ahmad, T. B. T., Madarsha, K. B., Zainuddin, A. M., Ismail, N. A. H., & Nordin, M. S. (2010). Faculty’s acceptance of computer based technology: Cross-validation of an extended model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 268–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshel, M. H., Weatherby, N. L., Kang, M., & Watson, T. (2009). Rasch calibration of a unidimensional perfectionism inventory for sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 210–216.10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Broos, A. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (IT) anxiety: Male self assurance and female hesitation. Cyber Psychology & Behaviour, 8, 21–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., & Chien, Y.-H. (2005). Effect of dynamic display and speed of display movement on reading Chinese text presented on a small screen. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 865–873.10.2466/PMS.100.3.865-873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (2009a). A comparison of onscreen and paper-based marking in the Hong Kong public examination system. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 243–263.10.1080/13803610902972940
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (2009b). Validating onscreen marking in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 423–431.
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (2011). A qualitative examination of the attitudes of Liberal Studies markers towards onscreen marking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 1042–1054.10.1111/bjet.2011.42.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coniam, D. (2013). The increasing acceptance of onscreen marking – The ‘tablet computer’ effect. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Coniam, D., & Yeung, A. (2010). Markers’ perceptions regarding the onscreen marking of Liberal Studies in the Hong Kong public examination system. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30, 249–271.10.1080/02188791.2010.495836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, C., Barkhuizen, G., Knoch, U., & Von Randow, J. (2007). Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment. Language Testing, 24, 37–64.10.1177/0265532207071511
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 484–492). Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/kennedy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (1997). Communicating examinee measures as expected ratings. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11, 550–551.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2006a). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS/MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2006b). FACETS (Version 3.6) [Computer Software and manual]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past 10 years. Journal of Documentation, 61, 700–712.10.1108/00220410510632040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2008). Gender differences in the online reading environment. Journal of Documentation, 64, 616–626.10.1108/00220410810884101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research), expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Li, X., Williams, C. C., Cave, K. R., & Well, A. D. (2007). Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research, 47, 2714–2726.10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieverding, M., & Koch, S. C. (2009). (Self-)evaluation of computer competence: How gender matters. Computers & Education, 52, 696–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, E., Morita, M., & Stark, L. W. (1985). Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 502–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, S. (2003, August 20–23). Attitudinal barriers amongst teachers in distance teaching institutions of India. Paper presented at the Forum on ICTs & Gender: Optimizing Opportunities, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Suto, I., Nádas, R., & Bell, J. (2011). Who should mark what? A study of factors affecting marking accuracy in a biology examination. Research Papers in Education, 26, 21–51.10.1080/02671520902721837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 413–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2010). Establishing gender structural invariance of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, J. L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–176). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50010-4
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 37, 425–478.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Coniam, D. (2013). Assessing the ease of use in the environment and markers’ acceptance of onscreen marking: A Rasch measurement perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 461–483.10.1080/13803611.2013.793604
   Google Scholar
• Yen, N.-S., Tsai, J.-L., Chen, P.-L., Lin, H.-Y., & Chen, A. L. P. (2011). Effects of typographic variables on eye-movement measures in reading Chinese from a screen. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30, 797–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrett, N. R., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). Who’s computing? Gender and race differences in young adults’ decisions to pursue an information technology career. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 65–84.10.1002/(ISSN)1534-8687
   PubMedGoogle Scholar