Accuracy in student self-assessment: directions and cautions for research

References

• Alsaker, F. D. (1989). School achievement, perceived academic competence and global self-esteem. School Psychology International, 10, 147–158. doi:10.1177/0143034389102009
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 199–214. doi:10.1080/09695941003696172
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27, 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 12–19.10.1080/00405840802577544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barling, J. (1980). A multistage multidependent variable assessment of children’s self-regulation of academic performance. Child Behavior Therapy, 2, 43–54.10.1300/J473V02N02_03
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. E., & Hixon, J. E. (1997). Effects of grade level and subject on student test score predictions. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 170–174.10.1080/00220671.1997.10543773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (1972). Factors associated with the accuracy of self-reported high-school grades. Psychology in the Schools, 9, 364–370. doi:10.1002/1520-6807%28197210%299:4%3C364:AID-PITS2310090404%3E3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P. (1997a). Pupils’ self assessments of academic attainment at 7, 11 and 16 years: Effects of sex and ethnic group. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 169–184.10.1111/bjep.1997.67.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P. (1997b). Students’ self assessment of academic attainment: Accuracy and stability from 7 to 16 years and influence of domain and social comparison group. Educational Psychology, 17, 345–359. doi:10.1080/0144341970170308
   Google Scholar
• Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2012). Calibration research: Where do we go from here? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, B. K. (2001). Do students effectively monitor their comprehension? Reading Horizons, 41, 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., Andolina, M., Zuza, M., & Furman, R. (2004). Minute math: An action research study of student self-assessment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 213–227.10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049293.55249.d4
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, V. (2002). Assessment in secondary schools: The new teacher’s guide to monitoring, assessment, recording, reporting and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452218649
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2, 22–30. doi:10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Wang, Z. (2013). Illustrating assessment: How Hong Kong university students conceive of the purposes of assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1037–1057. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.616955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1990). The effects of mastery and competitive conditions on self-assessment at different ages. Child Development, 61, 201–21010.2307/1131059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (2011). Are positive illusions about academic competence always adaptive, under all circumstances: New results and future directions. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 251–256. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Claes, M., & Salame, R. (1975). Motivation toward accomplishment and the self-evaluation of performances in relation to school achievement. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 7, 397–410. doi:10.1037/h0081924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J. P., & Ilardi, B. C. (1987). Self-system concomitants of discrepancies between children’s and teachers' evaluations of academic competence. Child Development, 58, 1297–1307. doi:10.2307/1130622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. (2009). My teacher and my friends helped me learn: Student perceptions and experiences of classroom assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 85–105). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.10.2307/1131221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199–212.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.10.3102/00346543059004395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, K. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1987). What children say about classroom performance: Sex and grade differences in perceived competence. Child Development, 58, 1066–1078.10.2307/1130547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 101–121.10.1007/s11409-008-9021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D., Bol, L., Horgan, D., & Rakow, E. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160–170.10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haertel, E. H. (2006). Reliability. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 65–110). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., Harnett, J., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). “Drawing” out student conceptions of assessment: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 53–83). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Peddie, R. (2003). School reports: ‘Praising with faint damns’. Set: Research Information for Teachers, (3), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Heldsinger, S. A., & Humphry, S. M. (2013). Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher-assessment of writing: An empirical study. Educational Research, 55, 219–235.10.1080/00131881.2013.825159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, M. P. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322. doi:10.2307/3345614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, M. P. (2005). Self-evaluation accuracy among high school and middle school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 148–161.10.1177/002242940505300205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, K. M., Harris, N. A., & Kuehn, L. L. (1994). Placing assessment into the hands of young children: A study of student-generated criteria and self-assessment. Educational Assessment, 2, 309–324. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0204_3
   Google Scholar
• Ikeguchi, C. B. (1996). Self assessment and ESL competence of Japanese returnees. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED399798.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaderavek, J. N., Gillam, R. B., Ukrainetz, T. A., Justice, L. M., & Eisenberg, S. N. (2004). School-age children’s self-assessment of oral narrative production. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26, 37–48. doi:10.1177/15257401040260010401
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kasanen, K., & Räty, H. (2002). ‘You be sure now to be honest in your assessment’: Teaching and learning self-assessment. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 313–328. doi:10.1023/A:1020993427849
   Google Scholar
• Kasanen, K., Räty, H., & Eklund, A.-L. (2009). Elementary school pupils’ evaluations of the malleability of their academic abilities. Educational Research, 51, 27–38.10.1080/00131880802704699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, N., & Downs, C. (2007). Self‐assessment and the disadvantaged student: Potential for encouraging self‐regulated learning? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 475–494.10.1080/02602930600896464
   Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82.10.3102/00346543075001063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, D. C., & Lai, D. W. (1993, May). The self-perception of competence by Canadian and Chinese children. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Laveault, D., & Miles, C. (2002, April). The study of individual differences in the utility and validity of rubrics in the learning of writing ability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• LaVoie, J. C., & Hodapp, A. F. (1987). Children’s subjective ratings of their performance on a standardized achievement test. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 73–80. doi:10.1016/0022-4405%2887%2990062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, M., Alwis, W., & Schmidt, G. (2010). Accuracy of students’ self-assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A., & Smith, J. (2008). Response to assessment feedback: The effects of grades, praise, and source of information ( Research Report RR-08-30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, R., & Kossack, S. (2007). Effects of recurring use of self-assessment in university courses. International Journal of Learning, 14, 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., & Dolkar, D. (2010). School-based assessments in high-stakes examinations in Bhutan: A question of trust? Exploring inconsistencies between external exam scores, school-based assessments, detailed teacher ratings, and student self-ratings. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 421–435.10.1080/13803611.2010.530437
   Google Scholar
• Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723–731.10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. L., Duffy, S. E., & Zane, T. (1993). Improving the accuracy of self-corrected mathematics homework. The Journal of Educational Research, 86, 184–189.10.1080/00220671.1993.9941157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. M., & Geraci, L. (2011). Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 303–314. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, J. R., & Earl, J. K. (2008). Accuracy in self-assessment: The role of ability, feedback, self-efficacy and goal orientation. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17, 39–50.10.1177/103841620801700307
   Google Scholar
• Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17–59). New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X
   Google Scholar
• Raider-Roth, M. B. (2005). Trusting what you know: Negotiating the relational context of classroom life. Teachers College Record, 107, 587–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 18–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11(10), 1–13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5–6 mathematics effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8, 43–58.10.1207/S15326977EA0801_03
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998a, April). Impact of self-evaluation training on mathematics achievement in a cooperative learning environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998b). Skills training versus action research in-service: Impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 463–477.10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00054-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (2002). Influences on student cognitions about evaluation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9, 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450–462. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1–31.10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2004). Self-efficacy in education revisited: Empirical and applied evidence. In D. M. McInerney & S. van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 115–138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J. (1981). Children’s perceptions of their own and their classmates’ ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 404–410. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.3.404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J., & Tannatt, L. M. (1984). Children’s judgments of their own and their peers’ academic competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 75–84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chang, T.-H., & Yu, W.-C. (2010). How many heads are better than one? The reliability and validity of teenagers’ self- and peer assessments. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 135–145. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. (2010). Fairness in classroom assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 125–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, S. M. (1982). Effects of systematic self-monitoring and self-reinforcement in children’s management of test performances. The Journal of Psychology, 111, 129–136.10.1080/00223980.1982.9923524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Wright, C. R. (1993). The predictive validity of student self-evaluations, teachers’ assessments, and grades for performance on the verbal reasoning and numerical ability scales of the differential aptitude test for a sample of secondary school students attending rural Appalachia schools. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 259–270. doi:10.1177/0013164493053001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar