Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms

References

• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493–537). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536–553. doi:10.1002/sce.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decristan, J., Hondrich, A. L., Büttner, G., Hertel, S., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., … Hardy, I. (2015). Impact of additional guidance in science education on primary students’ conceptual understanding. The Journal of Educational Research, Published online on March 11, 2015. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.899957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., … Hardy, I. (in press). Embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality: How do they interact in promoting students’ science understanding? American Educational Research Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, R. H., Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2011). Enacting assessment for learning: The beliefs practice nexus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 365–379. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.526587
   Google Scholar
• Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256. doi:10.1093/her/18.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, A. (2011). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 265–290. doi:10.1002/sce.20473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shemwell, J. T., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Shavelson, R. J., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 360–389. doi:10.1080/08957340802347852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grambsch, P. M. (1994). Simple robust tests for scale differences in paired data. Biometrika, 81, 359–372. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.2.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (2009). Evolution of the treatment integrity concept: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 38, 533–540.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., Hertel, S., Kunter, M., Klieme, E., Warwas, J., Büttner, G., & Lühken, A. (2011). Adaptive Lerngelegenheiten in der Grundschule: Merkmale, methodisch-didaktische Schwerpunktsetzungen und erforderliche Lehrkompetenzen [Adaptive learning environments in primary school: Characteristics, didactical approaches and required teacher competencies.] Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 57, 819–833.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 307–326. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, A. (2006). Unterrichtsqualität: Erfassen, Bewerten, Verbessern [Teaching quality: Assessment, evaluation, improvement]. Seelze: Kallmeyersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Jonen, A., & Möller, K. (2005). Die KiNT-Boxen – Kinder lernen Naturwissenschaft und Technik [The KiNT-Boxes – Children learn science and technology]. Essen: Spectra-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, P. (2005). Uncovering student ideas in science, volume 1. Arlington, VA: National Science Teacher Association (NSTA).10.2505/9780873552554
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 28–37. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
   Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. D. (2011). Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 523–539. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9344-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849–867. doi:10.1002/sce.10092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315–340. doi:10.1177/109821400302400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyce, P. E. (2011). Introduction and overview: The elusive promise of formative assessment. In P. E. Noyce & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), New frontiers in formative assessment (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84. doi:10.3102/0034654307313793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54, 405–429. doi:10.1080/00131881.2012.734725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2006). A multi-method and multi-source approach for studying fidelity of implementation. CSE: Technical Report 677. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing/University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 1–20. doi:10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E. M., Ayala, C., Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Formative assessment, motivation, and science learning. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 139–158). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., … Yin, Y (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295–314. doi:10.1080/08957340802347647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2005). ‘They don’t give us our marks’: The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12, 21–38. doi:10.1080/0969594042000333896
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. D. (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13, 239–264. doi: 10.1080/09695940601035387
   Google Scholar
• Tomita, M. K. (2009). Examining the influence of formative assessment on conceptual accumulation and conceptual change (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database on http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/pubnum/3343949.html
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615–631.doi:10.1080/0141192012009578010.1080/01411920120095780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (1997). An in-depth study of a teacher engaged in an innovative primary science trial professional development project. Research in Science Education, 27, 51–69. doi:10.1007/BF02463032
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 49–65. doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Tomita, M., Furtak, E. M., ... Young, D. B. (2008). On the measurement and impact of formative assessment on students' motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335–359. doi:10.1080/08957340802347845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar