Preparing students for college admissions tests

References

• Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 940–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Johnston, P. (2010). The impact of socioeconomic status on high-stakes testing reexamined. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37, 193–199.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–105.10.1111/peps.1988.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41, 4–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C. (2005). Meta-analysis: A case study. Evaluation Review, 29, 87–127.10.1177/0193841X04272555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C. (2009). Preparation for college admission exams ( 2009 NACAC Discussion Paper). Arlington, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89, 435–461.10.1353/sof.2010.0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College Board. (2012). SAT score-use practices by participating institution. Retrieved July 15, 2015, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/sat-score-use-practices-list.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70–83.10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Eller, A. (2012). Timing matters: Test preparation, race, and grade level. Sociological Forum, 27, 458–480.10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodsky, E. (2010). Commentaries: Learning in the shadows and in the light of day: A commentary on shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89, 475–481.10.1353/sof.2010.0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, B. (2012). Test anxiety and performance-avoidance goals explain gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. Personality & Individual Differences, 53, 816–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. M. (1989). Truth, gender, and the SAT. Academic Questions, 3, 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, J. (2004). Private tutoring: How prevalent and effective is it? London Review of Education, 2, 109–122.10.1080/1474846042000229458
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, L. R., & Kahn, E. A. (2001). How to prepare students for high-stakes tests (and still live with your conscience!). Paper presented at the annual fall conference of the Illinois Association of Teachers of English, Elmhurst, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Kapler, I. V., Cepeda, N. J., & Weston, T. (2012). Spacing, testing, and feedback: Helping students overcome forgetting. Education Canada, 52, 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Kulik, C. C. (1984). Effectiveness of coaching for aptitude tests. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 179–188.10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1984). Effects of practice on aptitude and achievement test scores. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 435–447.10.3102/00028312021002435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly, J., & Montgomery, P. (2011). Systematic reviews of the effects of preparatory courses on university entrance examinations in high school-age students. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, J. W. (1988). Gender bias in SAT items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, S., Lubienski, C., & Crane, C. (2008). Achievement differences and school type: The role of school climate, teacher certification, and instruction. American Journal of Education, 115, 97–138.10.1086/590672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R. C., Agarwal, P. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 360–372.10.1002/acp.v27.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S., & Jungeblut, A. (1981). Time and method in coaching for the SAT. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 191–216.10.1037/0033-2909.89.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyaska, J. R. (2000). A framework for evaluating the validity of test preparation practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Nankervis, B. (2011). Gender inequities in university admission due to the differential validity of the SAT. Journal of College Admission, 213, 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for College Admission Counseling. (2008). Guiding the way to higher education: Step-by-step to college workshops for students. Arlington, VA: NACAC. Retrieved July 31, 2013, from http://www.nacacnet.org/research/PublicationsResources/Marketplace/Documents/LateHS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association for College Admission Counseling. (2011). 2011 State of college admission. Retrieved April 28, 2013, from http://www.nacacnet.org/research/PublicationsResources/Marketplace/Documents/SOCA2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, B. F., Mattern, K. D., & Swerdzewski, P. (2012). Are the best scores the best scores for predicting college success? Journal of College Admission, 3, 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, J. (2003). Test preparation: What makes it effective? In E. Janet Wall & R. Garry Walz (Eds.), Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators (pp. 397–414). Greensboro, NC: ERIC Counseling and Student Services Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1–22.10.1037/a0013978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Teaching test-taking skills: Helping students show what they know. Brookline, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. L. (2009). Ethical and appropriate high-stakes test preparation in middle school: Five methods that matter. Middle School Journal, 41, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vigdor, J. L., & Clotfelter, C. T. (2003). Retaking the SAT. The Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 1–33.10.2307/1558754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar