Assessment for learning in Norway and Portugal: the case of primary school mathematics teaching

References

• Abrantes, P. (2002). Introdução [Introduction]. In P. Abrantes & F. Araújo (Eds.), Reorganização curricular do ensino básico [Curricular reorganisation in basic education] (pp. 7–15). Lisboa: Ministério de Educação, Departamento da Educação Básica [Ministry of Education, Department of Basic Education].
   Google Scholar
• ARG. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group. Retrieved from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org/
   Google Scholar
• Barreira, C., & Pinto, J. (2005). A investigação em Portugal sobre a avaliação das aprendizagens dos alunos (1990–2005) [Research on the assessment of students in Portugal]. Investigar em Educação, 4, 21–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 5–34.10.1007/BF01273293
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2013). Formative and summative aspects of assessment: Theoretical and research foundations in the context of pedagogy. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 167–178). London: Sage.10.4135/9781452218649
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research’ formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 624–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Lessons from around the world: How policies, politics and cultures constrain and afford assessment practices. Curriculum Journal, 16, 249–261.10.1080/09585170500136218
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (2nd ed., pp. 206–230). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting into practice. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boistrup, L. B. (2010). Assessment discourses in mathematics classrooms: A multimodal semiotic study. Stockholm: Universitetsservice.
   Google Scholar
• Breiteig, T. (2013). Preparing teachers of mathematics in Norway. In J. Schwille, L. Ingvarson, & R. Holdgreve-Resendez (Eds.), TEDS-M encyclopedia. A guide to teacher education context, structure, and quality assurance in 17 countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M) (pp. 131–148). Amsterdam: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• CNE (Conselho Nacional de Educação). (2012). Estado da educação 2012. Autonomias e descentralização [The state of education 2012. Autonomies and decentralization]. Lisboa: Editorial do Ministério de Educação e Ciência.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Daughterly, R., Black, P., Ecclestone, K., James, M., & Newton, P. E. (2012). Alternative perspectives on learning outcomes: Challenges for assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 72–87). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Decreto-Lei nº 137/2012 de 2 de julho de (2012). Agrupamentos de escolas [Grouping schools].
   Google Scholar
• Decreto-Lei nº 22/2014 de 11 de fevereiro de (2014). Regime jurídico da avaliação contínua [Legal regime of in-service teacher education].
   Google Scholar
• Despacho nº 8248/2013 de 25 de junho de (2013). Calendário escolar para 2013/2014 [Scholar calendar of 2013/2014].
   Google Scholar
• Despacho normativo nº 98-A/92 de 20 de junho de (1992). Avaliação das aprendizagens dos alunos do ensino básico [Assessment of students in basic education].
   Google Scholar
• DGEEC (Direção Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência – General Directorate for Education and Science Statistics). (2012). Educação e números–Portugal 2012 [Education and numbers–Portugal 2012]. Lisboa: Ministério de Educação [Ministry of Education].
   Google Scholar
• Elstad, E., Nortvedt, G. A., & Turmo, A. (2009). The Norwegian assessment system: An accountability perspective. Cadmo, 17, 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, D. (2006). Vinte anos de avaliação das aprendizagens: Uma síntese interpretativa de artigos publicados em Portugal [Twenty years of assessment of learning: An interpretive summary of articles published in Portugal]. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia [Portuguese Journal of Pedagogy], 40, 289–348.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment for learning: Introduction. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (2nd ed., pp. 1–8). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. C. (2003). Learning disabilities in basic mathematics: Difficulties in memory and cognition. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical cognition (pp. 93–116). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• GEP (Gabinete de Estudos e Planeamento–Office of Research and Planning). (2010). Educação e números–Portugal 2010 [Education and numbers–Portugal 2010]. Lisboa: GEP, Ministério de Educação [ Ministry of Education].
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, A., & Nyen, T. (2009). Kompetanse – for hvem? Sluttrapport for evalueringen av ‘Kompetanse for utvikling. Strategi for kompetanseutvikling i grunnopplæringen 2005– 2008.’ [Competence – for whom? Final report from the evaluation of ‘Competence for development. Strategy for developing competence in basic education 2005–2008’]. Fafo-Report 2009:21. Oslo: Fafo.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning – tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal, 16, 207–223.10.1080/09585170500136093
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2012). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 171–184). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. H., Throndsen, I. S., Lie, S., & Dale, E. L. (2012). Assessment with distinctly defined criteria: A research study of a national project. Policy Futures in Education, 10, 421–433.10.2304/pfie
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., Tolo, A., Florez, T., & El Masri, Y. (2013). Balancing trust and accountability? The assessment for learning programme in Norway. A governing complex educational systems case study. OECD. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261365653_Hopfenbeck_T.N._Tolo_A._Florez_T.__El_Masri_Y._(2013)_Balancing_Trust_and_Accountability_The_Assessment_for_Learning_Programme_in_Norway._Report_for_OECD_Paris_part_of_the_Governing_Complex_Education_Systems.10.1787/5k3txnpqlsnn-en
   Google Scholar
• INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística–National Institute of Statistics). (2012). Censos 2011 [Census 2011]. Retrieved from http://censos.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=CENSOS&xpgid=censos2011_apresentacao
   Google Scholar
• INE-BP, DGO/MF. (2012). Despesas do estado em educação [State expenditure on education]. PORDATA. Retrieved from http://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Despesas+do+Estado+em+educacao+execucao+orcamental+em+percentagem+do+PIB-867
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2003). Lærernes klasseromsarbeid: Interaksjons - og arbeidsformer i norske klasserom etter Reform 97 [Teachers in the classroom: Interaction and working in Norwegian classrooms after Reform 97]. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter reform 97 [Classroom practices after Reform 97] (pp. 39–76). Oslo: Unipub.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper, W., Nieveen, N., & Berkvens, J. (2013). Curriculum regulation and freedom in the Netherlands. In W. Kuiper & J. Berkvens (Eds.), Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe (pp. 139–162). CIDREE Yearbook 2013. Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerstrøm, B. O. (2007). Kompetanse i grunnskolen. Hovedresultater 2005/2006 [Competence in compulsory education. Main findings in 2005/2006]. SBB 2007/21. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerstrøm, B. O., Moafi, H., & Revold, M. K. (2014). Kompetanseprofil i grunnskolen. Hovedresultater 2013/2014 [Competence profiles in compulsory education. Main results]. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, J. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? OECD Education Working Paper no. 58. Retrieved from http://search.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?cote=edu/wkp(2011)4&doclanguage=en10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en
   Google Scholar
• Lovdata (2006). Regulations to the educational act. Oslo: Lovdata.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 209–220.10.1080/0969594032000121289
   Google Scholar
• MEC (Ministério de Educação e Ciência–Ministry of Education and Science). (2007). Programa de matemática do ensino básico [Mathematics program of basic education]. Retrieved from http://www.dgidc.min-edu.pt/ensinobasico/index.php?s=directorio&pid=71
   Google Scholar
• MEC (Ministério de Educação e Ciência–Ministry of Education and Science). (2013). Programa e metas curriculares. Matemática. Ensino básico [Program and curriculum outcomes. Mathematics. Basic education]. Retrieved from http://www.dgidc.minedu.pt/ensinobasico/index.php?s=directorio&pid=29
   Google Scholar
• MER. (2014). Press release. Innfører femåring lærerutdanning på masternivå [Teacher education becomes a 5-year-master programme]. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/kd/pressesenter/pressemeldinger/2014/Innforer-5-arig-grunnskolelarerutdanning-pa-masterniva.html?id=761439
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, P., Field, S., & Pont, B. (2004). Equity in education. Thematics review. Norway. Country note. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• NDET. (2012). The education mirror 2012. Oslo: NDET.
   Google Scholar
• NDET. (2014a). Læreplan i matematikk fellesfag [Mathematics curriculum]. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Lareplaner/Finn-lareplan/#matematikk
   Google Scholar
• NDET. (2014b). Assessment for læring [Assessment for learning]. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Vurdering-for-laring/VFL-skoler/
   Google Scholar
• NDET. (2014c). Kartlegging grunnskole [Mapping tests for compulsory education]. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Vurdering/Kartlegging-gs/
   Google Scholar
• NDET. (2014d). Stipendordningen [The stipend regulations]. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Utvikling/Etter-og-videreutdanning/Etter–og-videreutdanning/Retningslinjer-for-stipendordning-for-larere/
   Google Scholar
• NDET (Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training). (2008). The education mirror 2007. Oslo: NDET.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 149–170.10.1080/09695940701478321
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2012). Validity, purpose and the recycling of results from educational assessments. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 264–276). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
   Google Scholar
• NMER. (2002). First class from first grade. Official Norwegian report, 2002: 10. Oslo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• NMER. (2007). Summary of report No. 16 (2006–2007) to the Storting: Early intervention for lifelong learning. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/Rpub/STM/20062007/016EN/PDFS/STM200620070016000EN_PDFS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NMER. (2010). National curriculum regulations for differentiated primary and lower secondary teacher education programmes for years 1–7 and years 5–10. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Vedlegg/UH/forskrifter/National_Curriculum_Differentiated_Teacher_Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NMER & NDET. (2006). Læreplanverket for kunnskapsløftet [National curriculum for knowledge promotion in primary and secondary education and training]. Oslo: NDET.
   Google Scholar
• Nordahl, T., & Hausstätter, R. S. (2009). Spesialundervisningens forutsetninger, innsats og resultater [The conditions, efforts and results of special needs education]. Hamar: Hamar University College.
   Google Scholar
• Nushe, D., Earl, L., Maxwell, W., & Shewbridge, C. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education, Norway. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Opplæringsloven [Educational act]. (1998). Retrieved from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1998-07-17-61
   Google Scholar
• Pedder, D., & James, M. (2012). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 33–48). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250808
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, J., & Santos, L. (2013). Contributions pour un dialogue entre l’évaluation formative et sommative [Contributions for a dialogue between formative and summative assessment]. Actes du 25ème colloque de l’ADMEE–Europe: Evaluation et autoévaluation, quels espaces de formation [Proceedings of ADMEE–Europe: Assessment and self-assessment, what areas of training]. Fribourg. Retrieved from http://www.admee2013.ch/ADMEE-2013/7.html
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, P., Donaldson, G., Looney, A., & Nusche, D. (2012). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Portugal. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy
   Google Scholar
• Santos, L. (2008). Um olhar sobre o Plano da Matemática [A look at the plan of mathematics]. Educação e Matemática [Education & Mathematics], 97, 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, L., Pinto, J., Rio, F., Pinto, F., Varandas, J., Moreirinha, O., … Bondoso, T. (2010). Avaliar para aprender: Relatos de experiências de sala de aula do pré-escolar ao ensino secundário [Assessing for learning: Reports of experiences of the classroom from preschool to secondary school]. Porto: Porto Editora e Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1066–1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2014). Fakta om utdanning 2014: Nøkkeltall fra 2012 [Facts about education 2014: Key numbers from 2012]. Oslo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers’ assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 399–417.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615–631.10.1080/01411920120095780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Daal, V., Solheim, R. G., Gabrielsen, N. N., & Begnum, A. C. (2007). Norske elevers leseinnsats og leseferdigheter. Resultater fra fjerde og femte trinn i den internasjonale studien PIRLS 2006 [Norwegian students’ reading efforts and skills. Results for fourth and fifth grade in the international PIRLS 2006 study]. Stavanger: Lesesenteret.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track. In F. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar