Standards of practice to standards of evidence: developing assessment capable teachers

References

• Adie, L., Lloyd, M., & Beutel, D. (2013). Identifying discourses of moderation in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 968–977. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.769200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albury, D. (2011). Creating the conditions for radical public service innovation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 227–235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2008). Transforming Australia’s higher education system: Review of Australian higher education – Final report (D. Bradley, Chair). Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teachers and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2011). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Carlton South: Education Services Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., Hughes, C., & Adie, L. (2015). What’s the point of moderation? A discussion of the purposes achieved through contemporary moderation practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 638–653. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1039932
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B., & Sutton, D. (2010). Review of teacher education and school induction: First report – Full report. Brisbane: Department of Education and Training, Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, J., & Bunt, L. (2012). Innovation in policy: Allowing for creativity, social complexity and uncertainty in public governance. Retrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/innovation_in_policy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77, 6–27. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739015
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 213–229. doi:10.1080/17508480902998421
   Google Scholar
• Craven, G., Beswick, K., Fleming, J., Fletcher, T., Green, M., Jensen, B., … Rickards, F. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group
   Google Scholar
• Crimmins, G., Nash, G., Oprescu, F., Alla, K., Brock, G., Hickson-Jamieson, B., & Noakes, C. (2015). Can a systematic assessment moderation process assure the quality and integrity of assessment practice while supporting the professional development of casual academics? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 427–441. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1017754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120–138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2011, April). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform ( Seminar Series 204). Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems [ Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=STjrCQAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, J. (2015). Teaching tomorrow’s teachers. Options for the future of initial teacher education in Wales (Report to Huw Lewis, Minister for Education and Skills). Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, V., Patton, A., & Temperley, J. (2011). Developing an innovation ecosystem for education: White paper. Retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/ecosystem_for_edu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heap, J. (1991). A situated perspective on what counts as reading. In C. D. Baker & A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 103–140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S. (2008). Policy experimentation in China’s economic rise. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(1), 1–26. doi:10.1007/s12116-007-9014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobday, M., Boddington, A., & Grantham, A. (2012). Policies for design and policies for innovation: Contrasting perspectives and remaining challenges. Technovation, 32(5), 272–281. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. D. (2012). University–school partnerships: Pre-service and in-service teachers working together to teach primary science. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 57–82. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n3.1
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K., Scott, G., Aubin, K., Alexander, H., Angelo, T., Campbell, S., … Vaughan, S. (2013). Assuring final year subject and program achievement standards through inter-university peer review and moderation. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-assuring-learning-teaching-standards-inter-institutional-peer-review
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university–school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Acton: Teaching Australia, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Le Cornu, R. J. (2012). School co-ordinators: Leaders of learning in professional experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 18–33. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n3.5
   Google Scholar
• Maffei, S., Mortati, M., & Villari, B. (2013). Making/design policies together. 10th European Academy of Design Conference – Crafting the Future. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/3341210/Making_Design_Policies_Together
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, K., & Coombs, G. (2001). Unsung heroes: Exploring the roles of school-based professional experience coordinators in Australian preservice teacher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29, 275–288. doi:10.1080/13598660120091874.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M., Lewis, C., & Cook, G. (2009). Public sector innovation: A review of the literature. Retrieved from http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/Suppliment_Literature_Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., & Adams, P. (2014). The future of teacher professionalism and professionality in teaching. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 11(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. (2011). Sustaining school colleagues’ commitment to a long-term professional experience partnership. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 1–15. doi:10.14221/ajte.2011v36n5.2
   Google Scholar
• Queensland College of Teachers (QCT). (2006). Professional standards for Queensland teachers. Toowong: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland College of Teachers (QCT). (2007/2009/2011). Program approval guidelines for preservice teacher education. Toowong: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P., Baroutsis, A., van Kraayenoord, C., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2013). Teachers using classroom data well: Identifying key features of effective practices. Final report. Brisbane: The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Hull, K., Jensen, B., & Cooper, S. (2015). A new approach: Teacher education reform. Melbourne: Learning First.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2013). Assuring academic achievement standards: From moderation to calibration. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20, 5–19. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.714742
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P., Broadfoot, P., Coolahan, J., Furlong, J., & Kirk, G. (2014). Aspiring to excellence. Final report of the international review panel on the structure of initial teacher education in Northern Ireland ( Report to the Minister for Employment and Learning). Belfast: Department for Employment and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, G., Yeo, S., Mahmud, S., Briguglio, C., Wallace, M., Hukam-Singh, P., & Thuraisingam, T. (2011). Moderation for fair assessment in transnational learning and teaching. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-library?text=Moderation+for+fair+assessment+in+TNE
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, M. (2008). The character of harms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753862
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R., (2008, September 8). Assessment FOR learning, the achievement gap, and truly effective schools. Educational Testing Service and College Board conference, Educational Testing in America, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Authority (TEQSA). (2015). A risk and standards based approach to quality assurance in Australia’s diverse higher education sector. Retrieved from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-documents/RiskStandardsSectorPaperFeb2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tuovinen, J., Dachs, T., Fernandez, J., Morgan, D., & Sesar, J. (2015). Developing and testing models for benchmarking and moderation of assessment for private higher education providers. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-library?text=Developing+and+testing+models+for+benchmarking+moderation
   Google Scholar
• Turner, W. (2008). Developing and sustaining perpetual school university partnerships. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 international conference. Sustainability in higher education: Directions for change. Perth, WA: Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., & Gunn, S. (2009). Towards theorising assessment as critical inquiry. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 83–102). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Explicit, latent and meta-criteria: Types of criteria at play in professional judgement practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20, 35–52.10.1080/0969594X.2012.725030
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Colbert, P. (2014). Designing assessment for quality learning (Foundation book in the series: The enabling power of assessment). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C. & Looney, A. (2016). Professional standards and the assessment work of teachers. In L. Hayward & D. Wyse (Eds.), Handbook on curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 805–820). London: Routledge.10.4135/9781473921405
   Google Scholar