Multimodal composition and assessment: a sociocultural perspective

References

• Aagaard, T., & Lund, A. (2013). Mind the gap: Divergent objects of assessment in technology-rich learning environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8, 225–243.
   Google Scholar
• Adsanatham, C. (2012). Integrating assessment and instruction: Using student-generated grading criteria to evaluate multimodal digital projects. Computers and Composition, 29, 152–174.10.1016/j.compcom.2012.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment: An optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 161–177.10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 451–469.10.1080/0969594X.2011.557020
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, S. M., Cohn, J., McKittrick, M., & Snead, R. (2014). Current conversations on multimodal assignments and assessments: A collaborative review of four recent texts. Computers and Composition, 31, 67–78.10.1016/j.compcom.2013.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). Towards a new learning: The scholar social knowledge workspace, in theory and practice. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10, 332–356.10.2304/elea
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 199–214.10.1080/0950069042000276721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: Possibilities, boundaries and limitations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13, 215–232.10.1080/09695940600708653
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: A sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 182–192.10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451–498.10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. (2008). Changing assessment practices and the role of IT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 181–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2007). Ways of seeing video: Toward a phenomenology of viewing minimally edited footage. In R. Goldman (Ed.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 145–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20, 150–169.10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
   Google Scholar
• Gilje, Ø. (2010). Multimodal redesign in filmmaking practices: An inquiry of young filmmakers’ deployment of semiotic tools in their filmmaking practice. Written Communication, 27, 494–522.10.1177/0741088310377874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilje, Ø. (2015). Writing within and across modes in filmmaking. In A. Archer & E. Breuer (Eds.), Multimodality in writing: The state of the art in theory, methodology and pedagogy (pp. 153–171). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004297197
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. (2002). Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 73–83). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.10.1002/9780470753545
   Google Scholar
• Godhe, A.-L. (2013). Negotiating assessment criteria for multimodal texts. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 19, 31–43.10.18848/2327-7920/CGP
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633.10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In B. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Simon & Shuster MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802157
   Google Scholar
• Habib, L., & Wittek, L. (2007). The portfolio as artifact and actor. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14, 266–282.10.1080/10749030701623763
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (Vol. 125, pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2003). Re-thinking assessment: Multimodality, literacy and computer-mediated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 83–102.10.1080/09695940301698
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Harvey, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 15–26.10.1080/09695940301692
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S. (2012). Commentary. Instructional Science, 40, 849–855.10.1007/s11251-012-9233-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, A. (2008). Assessment made visible: Individual and collective practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 32–51.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. A., Pullin, D. C., Gee, J. P., Haertel, E. H., & Young, L. J. (2008). Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802157
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15, 68–85.10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9, 233–265.10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S. (2013). Variations in grading practice–subjects matter. Education Inquiry, 4, 555–575.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., & Sannino, A. (2015). Students’ deviations from a learning task: An activity-theoretical analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 31–46.10.1016/j.ijer.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2003). The process of understanding the task: How is agency distributed between students, teachers and representations in technology-rich learning environments? International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 839–849.10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (1998). Situated cognition and assessment of competence in science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 155–169.10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77–84.10.1080/0969595980050104
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, E. J., & Walker, R. A. (2008). Assessment as a vehicle for learning: Extending collaboration into testing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 103–117.10.1080/02602930601127844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silseth, K. (2013). Surviving the impossible: Studying students’ constructions of digital stories on World War II. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2, 155–170.10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silseth, K., & Arnseth, H. C. (2011). Learning and identity construction across sites: A dialogical approach to analysing the construction of learning selves. Culture & Psychology, 17, 65–80.10.1177/1354067X10388842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silseth, K., & Arnseth, H. C. (2016). Frames for learning science: Analyzing learner positioning in a technology-enhanced science project. Learning, Media and Technology, 41, 396–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., & Yusuf, W. F. B. M. (2013). Squaring literacy assessment with multimodal design: An analytic case for semiotic awareness. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 327–355.10.1177/1086296X13504155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. (2006). Children writing: Multimodality and assessment in the writing classroom. Literacy, 40, 51–57.10.1111/read.2006.40.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Wardle, E., & Roozen, K. (2012). Addressing the complexity of writing development: Toward an ecological model of assessment. Assessing Writing, 17, 106–119.10.1016/j.asw.2012.01.001
   Google Scholar