References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Assessment in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA
- Camilli, G. (2013). Ongoing issues in test fairness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 104–120.
- Cumming, J. J. (2008). Legal and educational perspectives of equity in assessment. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, 15, 123–135
- Gierl, M. J., Lai, H., & Li, J. (2013). Identifying differential item functioning in multi-stage computer adaptive testing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 188–203.
- Hare, R. M. (1977). Opportunity for what? Some remarks on current disputes about equality in education. Oxford Review of Education, 3, 207–216.
- Karami, H. (2013). The quest for fairness in language testing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 158–169.
- Kline, R. B. (2013). Assessing statistical aspects of test fairness with structural equation modelling. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 204–222.
- Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 141–157.
- Mislevy, R. J., Haertel, G., Cheng, B. H., Ructtinger, L., DeBarger, A., Murray, E., & Vendlinski, T. (2013). A ‘conditional’ sense of fairness in assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 141–157.
- Molenaar, D. & Borsboom, D. (2013). The formalisation of fairness: issues in testing for measurement invariance using subtest scores. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 223–244.
- Sireci, S. G. & Rios, J. A. (2013). Decisions that make a difference in detecting differential item functioning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 170–187.
- Solano-Flores, G. & Li, M. (2013). Generalizability theory and the fair and valid assessment of linguistic minorities. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 245–263.
- Zwick, R. (2000). The assessment of differential item functioning in computer adaptive tests. In W. J. van der Linden, & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 221–244). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/0-306-47531-6