Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development – a motivation perspective

References

• Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017a). The characteristics of formative assessment that enhance student achievement in mathematics. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122. doi:10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017b). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning and Instruction, 49, 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arter, J. (2009, April). Classroom assessment for student learning (CASL) perspective on the JCSEE student evaluation standards. Paper presented at AERA 2009 in the Division H Symposium JCSEE National Conference on Benchmarking Student Evaluation Practices, San Diego, CA. doi:10.1177/019263650108562107
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T., Newton, P., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. (2014). State of the field review: Assessment and learning. Oslo: Report for the Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Education, case number 13/4697. Retrieved from http://forskningsradet.no
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C., Steinberg, J., Wiliam, D., & Wylie, C. (2008, March). Formative assessment and teacher achievement: Two years of implementation of the Keeping Learning on Track Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347–363. doi:10.1080/09695940903319737
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 12(1), 39–54. doi:10.1080/0969594042000333904
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & McCloskey, L. (2008). Assessment for learning around the world what would it mean to be internationally competitive? The Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 263–272.10.1177/003172170809000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lisle, J. (2015). The promise and reality of formative assessment practice in a continous assessment scheme: The case of Trinidad and Tobago. Assessment in Education: Prinicples, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 79–103. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.944086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., Luu, K., Sun, Y., & Klinger, D. A. (2012). Assessment for learning in the classroom: Barriers to implementation and possibilities for teacher professional learning. Assessment Matters, 4, 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). Critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=7
   Google Scholar
• Filsecker, M., & Kerres, M. (2012). Repositioning formative assessment from an educational assessment perspective: A response to Dunn & Mulvenon (2009). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(16). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=16
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. (2011). Formative use of assessment information: It’s a process, so let’s say what we mean. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16(3). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=3
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2014). Assessment for learning in the writing classroom: An incomplete realization. The Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 201–237.
   Google Scholar
• Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
   Google Scholar
• Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 269–290. doi:10.1080/09695940903319661
   Google Scholar
• James, M., & McCormick, R. (2009). Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 25(7), 973–982. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A., Lundahl, C., & Holmgren, A. (2015). Evaluating a large-scale implementation of assessment for learning in Sweden. Assessment in Education: Prinicples, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 104–121. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.970612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 78–83. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149. doi:10.1080/02671520600615638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Chapter 6: Report of the task group on instructional practices. Retrieved September 12, 2014 from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/instructional-practices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Randel, B., Beesley, A. D., Apthorp, H., Clark, T. F., Wang, X., Cicchinelli, L. F., & Williams, J. M. (2011). Classroom assessment for student learning: Impact on elementary school mathematics in the central region (NCEE 2011-4005). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer- assisted learning interventions with elementary school studies: A meta- analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(10), 1–13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Investigating the efficacy of a professional development program in formative classroom assessment in middle school English language arts and mathematics. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. C., & Randel, B. (2010). Research on characteristics of effective professional development programs for enhancing educators’ skills in formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 251–276). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingsle, C. (2014). Formative assessment: Teacher knowledge and skills to make it happen ( Licentiate dissertation). Umeå University, Department of Science and Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning: Why no profile in US policy? In J. E. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 169–185). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011a). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011b). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IL: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, C., & Lyon, C. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Prinicples, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 140–160. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.990416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. S. (2009). Class size reduction or rapid formative assessment?: A comparison of cost-effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar