References
- Berge, K. L., Skar, G. B., Matre, S., Solheim, R., Evensen, L. S., Otnes, H., & Thygesen, R. (this issue). Introducing teachers to new semiotic tools for writing instruction and writing assessment: Consequences for students’ writing proficiency. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1330251
- Bramley, T., & Vitello, S. (2019). The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–16. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1418734
- Bramley, Tom, & Crisp, Victoria (2017): Spoilt for choice? Issues around the use and comparability of optional exam questions, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2017.1287662
- Daal, T. V., Lesterhuis, M., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & Maeyer, S. D. (2019). Validity of comparative judgement to assess academic writing: Examining implications of its holistic character and building on a shared consensus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1253542
- Evensen, L. S., Berge, K. L., Thygesen, R., Matre, S., & Solheim, R. (2016). Standards as a tool for teaching and assessing cross-curricular writing. The Curriculum Journal, 1–17. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1134338
- Hopfenbeck, T.N., & Stobart, G. (2015) Large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22: 1,1-2, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.1001566
- Matsushita, K. (2007a). Pafomansu hyouka: Kodomo no shiko to hyogen wo hyokasuru [Performance assessment: Assessing children performance and thinking]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyojun.
- Moss, P. A. (1994). Validity in high stakes writing assessment: Problems and Possibilities. Assessing Writing, 1, 109–128. doi: 10.1016/1075-2935(94)90007-8
- Nishioka, K. (2008a). Issues surrounding achievement in Japan: Examining the 2008 revisions of the national courses of study. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 3, 5–16.
- Nishioka, K. (2008b). ‘Gyakumuki sekkei’ de tashikana gakuryoku wo hoshosuru [Guarantee achievement through ‘backward design’]. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho Shuppan.
- Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional system. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
- Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 159–179. doi: 10.1080/02602930801956059
- Sadler, R. D. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84.
- Silseth, K., & Gilje, Ø. (this issue). Multimodal composition and assessment: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292
- Suzuki, H. (2013). Sutandado rifarensu hyoka [Standard-referenced assessment]. Tokyo: Toshobunkasha.
- Tanaka, K. (2008). Kyoiku hyoka [Educational assessment]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
- Tanaka, K. (2009). Academic achievement survey and educational assessment. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 4, 79–89.
- Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286. doi:10.1037/h0070288