A framework for classroom assessment, learning, and self-regulation

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003, April). Formative and summative assessment: Can they serve learning together? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association., Chicago, IL.X
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. M. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about assessment: Competing narratives. In  G. T. L. Brown (Ed.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 37–55). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. M. (2017, April). Using learning theory and validity theory to improve classroom assessment research, design, and implementation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. M., & Chen, P. P. (2019). Systematic classroom assessment: An approach for learning and self-regulation (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., Ruiz-Primo, M., Furtak, E., Shepard, L., & Yin, Y. (2012). Meta-analytic methodology and inferences about the efficacy of formative assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 31(4), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Camilli, G. (2013). Ongoing issues in test fairness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2–3), 104–120.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. P., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of middle-school mathematics students. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 221–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBenedetto, M. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Construct and predictive validity of microanalytic measures of students’ self-regulation of science learning. Learning and Individual Difference, 26, 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiacomo, G., & Chen, P. P. (2014). Enhancing self-regulatory skills through an intervention embedded in a middle school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(6), 601–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 6–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. (1999). Chapter 10: Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 355–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps, C., & Stobart, G. (2009). Fairness in assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. 105–118). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Keener, M. C. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 429–455). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., Jarvela, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environment. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed. pp. 83–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2011). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 17–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kapan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The Influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards.Metacognition and Learning, 3, 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills? Learning and Instruction, 60, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, M. J., Vosniadou, S., Van Deur, P., Wyra, M., & Jeffries, D. (2018). Teachers’ and students’ belief systems about the self-regulation of learning. Educational Psychology Review, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s10648-0189453-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, and day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2016). Deciding to curtail persistence. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (3rd ed., pp. 533–546). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the effect of formative assessment on student achievement: So much more is needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(2). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=18&n=2
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, G. E., & McCormick, J. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts: Effects of metacognitive instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 363–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125–173). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacogntiion? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and slef-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M. S. (2010). Instructional sensitivity as a psychometric property of assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(4), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, N., Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. (2009). Examining teacher ethical dilemmas in classroom assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 778–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39–55). Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2006). Classroom assessment. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 623–646). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large‐scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 3, pp. 1053–1098). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2018). Theorizing and researching levels of processing in self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical back-ground, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2015). A personal agency view of self-regulated learning: The role of goal setting. In F. Guay, H. Marsh, D. McInerney, & R. G. Craven (Eds.), Self-concept, motivation, and identity: Underpinning success with research and practices (pp. 83–114). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., Evans, D., & Mellins, R. B. (1999). Self-regulating childhood asthma: A developmental model of family change. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 55–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Moylan, A., Hudesman, J., White, N., & Flugman, B. (2011). Enhancing self-reflection and mathematics achievement of at-risk urban technical college students. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 108–127.
   Google Scholar