4,807
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Does a test have to be fair to be valid?

References

  • Barrance, R. (2019). The fairness of internal assessment in the GCSE: The value of students’ accounts. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619514
  • Bramley, T., & Vitello, S. (2019). The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–16. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1418734
  • Cohen, Y. (2019). The handbook of cognition and assessment frameworks, methodologies, and applications. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1597679
  • Heldsinger, S. A, & Humphry, S. M. (2010). Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37, 1–19.
  • Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2019). Writing assessment, comparative judgement and students’ evaluative expertise. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 1–5.
  • Jones, I. & Wheadon, C. (2015). Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 93–101.
  • Lundy, L., & McEvoy, L. (2012). Childhood, the United Nations convention on the rights of the child and research: What constitutes a ‘rights-based’ approach? In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and childhood (pp. 75–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McGrane, J. A., Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. (2018). Applying a thurstonian, two-stage method in the standardized assessment of writing. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(4), 297–311.
  • Nisbet, I., & Shaw, S. D. (2019). Fair assessment viewed through the lenses of measurement theory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1586643
  • Pollitt, A. (2012). The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 281–300.
  • Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2019). Conceptualising fairness in classroom assessment: Exploring the value of organisational justice theory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105
  • Verhavert, S., Bouwer, R., Donche, V., & De Maeyer, S. (2019). A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1602027
  • Willingham, W, & Cole, N. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Xi, X. (2010). How do we go about investigating test fairness? Language Testing, 27(2), 147–170.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.