Who is feedback for? The influence of accountability and quality assurance agendas on the enactment of feedback processes

References

• Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N., & Bates, A. (2016). The standards paradox: How quality assurance regimes can subvert teaching and learning in higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115617484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–25. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2019). Understanding performance appraisal: supervisory and employee perspectives. In WilkinsonA., BaconN., SnellS., and LepakD. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Human Resource Management (2nd ed.; pp. 195–209). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958–1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., & Stensaker, B. (2016). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801895786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–14. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dann, R. (2018). Developing feedback for pupil learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., & Iacovidou, M. (2004). Quality as pedagogy of confinement: Is there an alternative? Quality Assurance in Education, 12(3), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410548735
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019a). Identifying feedback that has impact. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education (pp. 15–34). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019b). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., Flórez Petour, M. T., & Tolo, A. (2015). Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Large-scale implementation of assessment for learning in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Independent Teacher Workload Review Group. (2016). Eliminating unnecessary workload around marking. Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “case study research in education”. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017). Feedback on feedback practice: Perceptions of students and academics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., & Winstone, N. E. (2017). Responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of assessment feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (2017). Using conceptual depth criteria: Addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 17(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116679873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2020). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–23. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education. (2016). Ofsted inspection myths. Ofsted. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/25207/1/Ofsted%20inspections%20myths%20-%20GOV_UK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orrell, J. (2008). Assessment beyond belief: The cognitive process of grading. In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 251–263). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, N. (2018). Playing the levelling field: Teachers’ management of assessment in English primary schools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 504–518.https://doi/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1264924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.629291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. F., & Bentley, K. J. (2005). Professional dissonance: Colliding values and job tasks in mental health practice. Community Mental Health Journal, 41(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-005-5084-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, J. (2012). Feedback-giving as social practice: Teachers’ perspectives on feedback as institutional requirement, work and dialogue. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.611870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, J. (2017). Academics engaging with student writing: Working at the higher education textface. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watling, C. J., & Ginsburg, S. (2019). Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Medical Education, 53(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2016). Quality assurance and quality enhancement: Is there a relationship? Quality in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1227207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2019a). Developing assessment feedback: From occasional survey to everyday practice. In S. Lygo-Baker, I. M. Kinchin, & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Engaging student voices in higher education: Diverse perspectives and expectations in partnership (pp. 109–123). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2019b). Exploring cultures of feedback practice: The adoption of learning-focused feedback practices in the UK and Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(2), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1532985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1–12. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Pitt, E., & Nash, R. (2020). Educators’ perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1748569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar