References
- Atkins, P. (2010). The laws of thermodynamics: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford.
- Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2017.1319337
- Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2010.513678
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
- Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment—An optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.999643
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ Asse Eval Acc, 21(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2018.1441807
- Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
- Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
- Cizek, G. J., Andrade, H. L., & Bennett, R. E. (2019). Formative assessment: History, definition, and progress. In H. L. Andrade, R. E. Bennett, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
- Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2020). Revising the definition of formative assessment. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://ccsso.org/resource-library/revising-definition-formative-assessment
- DeBarger, A. H., Penuel, W. R., Harris, C. J., & Kennedy, C. A. (2016). Building an assessment argument to design and use next generation science assessments in efficacy studies of curriculum interventions. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015581707
- Devaney, R. L. (2018). A first course in chaotic dynamical systems: Theory and experiment. CRC Press.
- diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(23), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
- Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education.
- Einstein, A. (1936). Physics and reality. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221(3), 349–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91047-5
- Esterhazy, R. (2018). What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1302–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463353
- Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M., & Wolfe, E. W. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225–297. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0504_1
- Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- Heaton, R. M. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance. Teachers College Press.
- Hempel, C. (1974). Formulation and formalization of scientific theories: A summary-abstract. In T. S. Kuhn & F. Suppe (Eds.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 244–254). University of Illinois Press.
- Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/286983
- Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. University of Chicago press.
- Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1204_2
- Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. (2019). Students’ formative assessment perceptions, feedback use and mathematics performance in secondary schools in Tanzania. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1593103
- McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., & Pelletier, P. (2015). Assessing science practices: Moving your class along a continuum. Science Scope, 39(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss15_039_04_21
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2012). Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing: Pearson.
- National Research Council. (2012) . A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
- Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
- Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation. Performance and Self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2013.877872
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms ( pp. 607). Basic Books.
- Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10020
- Pellegrino, J. W., DiBello, L. V., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). A framework for conceptualizing and evaluating the validity of instructionally relevant assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1145550
- Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_4
- Sato, M. E. (2015). Designing Critique for Knowledge Integration. Science & Mathematics Education.
- Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2017). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. NSTA Press.
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
- Swanson, H. (2019). Refining student thinking through scientific theory building. In E. Manalo (Ed.), Deeper Learning, Dialogic Learning, and Critical Thinking: Research-Based Strategies for the Classroom(pp. 67–83). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323058-5
- Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2007). Making models match: Replicating an agent-based model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(4), 2.