References
- Blundell, C. N. (2021). Teacher use of digital technologies for school-based assessment: A scoping review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1929828
- Gorgodze, S., & Chakhaia, L. (2021). The uses and misuses of centralised high stakes examinations-assessment policy and practice in Georgia. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1900775
- Jönsson, A., Balan, A., & Hartell, E. (2021). Analytic or holistic? A study about how to increase the agreement in teachers’ grading. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884041
- Lipnevich, A. A., Guskey, T. R., Murano, D. M., & Smith, J. K. (2020). What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1799190
- Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback. Cambridge University Press.
- Rasooli, A., Razmjoee, M., Cumming, J., Dickson, E., & Webster, A. (2021). Conceptualising a fairness framework for assessment adjusted practices for students with disability: An empirical study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1932736
- Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2021). Who is feedback for? The influence of accountability and quality assurance agendas on the enactment of feedback processes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1926221
- Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042