References
- Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
- Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
- Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
- Bernstein, J., Van Moere, A., & Cheng, J. (2010). Validating automated speaking tests. Language Testing, 27(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364404
- Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). Longman.
- Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
- Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing, 20(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt264oa
- Chapelle, C., & Douglas, D. (2006). Assessing language through computer technology. Cambridge University Press.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press.
- Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. https://www.coe.int/lang-cefr
- Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3587805
- Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.51997005
- Ducasse, A., & Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired orals: Rater’s orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26(3), 423–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104669
- Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
- Endres, H. (2012). A comparability study of computer-based and paper-based writing tests. Research Notes, University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, 49, 26–33. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/research-and-validation/published-research/research-notes/
- Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1980). Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 5(1), 47–118. Retrieved August 2, 2020 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43135245
- Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). On identifying communication strategies in interlanguage production. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 210–238). Longman.
- Fulcher, G. (1996). Testing tasks: Issues in task design and the group oral. Language Testing, 13(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300103
- Galaczi, E. D. (2004). Peer-peer interaction in a paired speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University.
- Galaczi, E. D. (2010). Face-to-face and computer-based assessment of speaking: Challenges and opportunities. Retrieved June 25, 2016, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281090096
- Galaczi, E. D. (2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired tests? Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017
- Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
- Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
- Jin, Y. (2019). Testing tertiary-level English language learners: The College English Test in China. In L. I-W. Su, C. J. Weir, & J. R. W. Wu (Eds.). English language proficiency testing in Asia: A new paradigm bridging global and local contexts (pp. 101–130). Routledge.
- Jin, Y., & Guo, J. (2002). 大学英语四, 六级考试非面试型口语考试效度研究 [Research on the validity of the CET Semi-Direct Oral Proficiency Test]. Foreign Language World, 5, 72–79.
- Jin, Y., & Yan, M. (2017). Computer literacy and the construct validity of a high-stakes computer-based writing assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1261293
- Jin, Y., & Zhang, L. (2016). The impact of test mode on the use of communication strategies in paired discussion. In G. Yu & Y. Jin (Eds.), Assessing Chinese learners of English: Language constructs, consequences and conundrums (pp. 61–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Johnson, M. (2004). A philosophy of second language acquisition. Yale University Press.
- Kasper, G., & Kellerman, E. (1997). Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives. Longman.
- Kiddle, T., & Kormos, J. (2011). The effect of mode of response on a semi-direct test of oral proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(4), 342–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.613503
- Lam, D. M. K. (2018). What counts as ‘responding’? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 377–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758126
- Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
- Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 1–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
- Luoma, S. (1997). Comparability of a tape-mediated and a face-to-face test of speaking: A triangulation study [Unpublished Licentiate thesis]. University of Jyväskylä.
- May, L. (2009). Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater’s perspective. Language Testing, 26(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104668
- May, L. (2011). Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565845
- May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E. (2020). Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219879044
- Nakatsuhara, F., Inoue, C., Berry, V., & Galaczi, E. (2017). Exploring the use of video-conferencing technology in the assessment of spoken language: A mixed-methods study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1263637
- O’Loughlin, K. (2001). The equivalence of direct and semi-direct speaking tests: Vol. 13. Studies in language testing. Cambridge University Press.
- Qian, D. (2009). Comparing direct and semi-direct modes for speaking assessment: Affective effects on test takers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300902800059
- Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15–30). Prentice Hall.
- Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
- Shohamy, E. (1994). The validity of direct versus semi-direct oral tests. Language Testing, 11(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229401100202
- Stansfield, C., & Kenyon, D. (1992). Research on the comparability of the Oral Proficiency Interview and the Simulated Oral Proficiency Interview. System, 20(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(92)90045-5
- Stenstrom, A. B. (1994). An introduction to spoken interaction. Longman.
- Swain, M., Huang, L., Barkaoui, K., Brooks, L., & Lapkin, S. (2009). The speaking section of the TOEFL iBT (SSTiBT): Test-takers’ reported strategic behaviors (TOEFL iBT Research Report No. RR-09-30). Educational Testing Service.
- Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.
- Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30(2), 417–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00326.x
- The National College English Testing Committee. (2016). 全国大学英语四, 六级考试大纲 [The National College English Testing Syllabus]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
- van Batenburg, E. S. L., Oostdam, R. J., van Gelderen, A. J. S., & de Jong, N. H. (2018). Measuring L2 speakers’ interactional ability using interactive speech tasks. Language Testing, 35(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216679452
- Wagner, J., & Firth, A. (1997). Communication strategies at work. In G. Kasper & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 323–344). Longman.
- Wigglesworth, G., & O’Loughlin, K. (1993). An investigation into the comparability of direct and semi-direct versions of an oral interaction test in English. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 2(1), 56–67. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.75514
- Young, R. (2011). Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 426–443). Routledge.