References
- Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 478–508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478
- Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318
- Adams, J. D., & Kanter, D. E. (2011). Playing to learn science: Exploring contexts and concepts. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2), 204–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.21.2.0204
- Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., MacNamara, A., Koenig, A., & Wainess, R. (2012). Narrative games for learning: Testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 235–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025595
- Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). L2 writing practice: Game enjoyment as a key to engagement. Language Learning and Technology, 18(2),124–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.125/44373
- Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Computer-based writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 316–329). The Guilford Press.
- Allen, L. K., & Perret, C. A. (2016). Commercialized writing systems. In S. A. Crossley, and D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 145–162). Routledge.
- Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566
- Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V.2. The Journal of Technology Learning and Assessment, 4(3). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1650/1492
- Au, K. H. (2000). A multicultural perspective on policies for improving literacy achievement: Equity and excellence. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 835–851). Earlbaum.
- Ballock, E., McQuitty, V., & McNary, S. (2017). An exploration of professional knowledge needed for reading and responding to student writing. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702576
- Balyan, R., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Combining machine learning and natural language processing to assess literary text comprehension. In X. Hu, T. Barnes, A. Hershkovitz, & L. Paquette (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), (pp. 244–249). Wuhan, China: International Educational Data Mining Society.
- Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., Dodge, T., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Narratizing disciplines and disciplinizing narratives: Games as 21st century curriculum. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 2(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2010010102
- Barab, S., Pettyjohn, P., Gresalfi, M., & Solomou, M. (2012). Game-based curricula, personal engagement, and the modern prometheus design project. In Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age (pp. 306–326). Cambridge University Press.
- Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3
- Barth, A. E., Barnes, M., Francis, D., Vaughn, S., & York, M. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 587–609. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9540-1
- Bazerman, C. (2016). What do sociocultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write?. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed. pp. 11–23). Guilford Press.
- Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1984). Learning about writing from reading. Written Communication, 1(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001002001
- Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1987.11075275
- Berninger, V. W., Richards, T., & Abbott, R. (2009). The role of the hand in written idea expression. In D. Alamargot, J. Bouchand, E. Lambert, V. Millogo, and C. Beaudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference “ de la France au Québec: l’Écriture dans tous ses états “. Poitiers, France: State of Writing Conference.
- Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbot, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtain, G., Hawkins, J. M., & Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291
- Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). Guilford Press.
- Bernstein, J., Klebanov, B. B., Elliot, N., & Molloy, H. (2016). A left turn: Automated feedback & activity generation for student writers. In Proceedings of the 3rd Language Teaching, Learning & Technology Workshop (pp. 6–13). San Francisco, CA.
- Best, R. M., Dockrell, J. E., & Braisby, N. R. (2006). Real-world word learning: Exploring children’s developing semantic representations of a science term. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X36128
- Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
- Botarleanu, R.-M., Dascalu, M., Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). Automated summary scoring with reader bench. In 17th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021). Athens, Greece: Springer.
- Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29(5), 591–690. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207599408248175
- Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2009). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 515–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z
- Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353
- Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2016). Third and fourth-grade teachers’ classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 9(5), 929–954. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x
- Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The criterion online writing service. AI Magazine, 25(3), 27–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v25i3.1774
- Butterfuss, R., Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., Orcutt, E., & Bulut, O. (2021). Question timing, language comprehension, and executive function in inferencing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1901903
- Butterfuss, R., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (in press). Strategy uptake in W-Pal: Adaptive feedback and instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research.
- Cambridge English. (n.d.) Write and improve [Online]. https://writeandimprove.com
- Chen, C.-F. E., & Cheng, W.-Y. E. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 94–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.125/44145
- Chen, M.-H., Huang, S.-T., Chang, J. S., & Liou, H.-C. (2013). Developing a corpus-based paraphrase tool to improve EFL learner’s writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.783873
- Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7
- Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
- Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950
- Clark, D., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & Dángelo, C. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence.
- Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312026002143
- Crossley, S. A., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The writing Pal: A writing strategy tutor. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 204–224). Taylor & Francis, Routledge.
- Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Educational technologies and literacy development. In S. A. Crossley, and D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 1–12). Taylor & Francis, Routledge.
- Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Using automatic scoring models to detect changes in student writing in an intelligent tutoring system. In C. Boonthum-Denecke & G. M. Youngblood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 208–213). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.
- Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
- Das, S., Nix, D., & Picheny, M. (1998). Improvements in children’s speech recognition performance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP ‘98), (Vol. 1, pp. 433–436). Seattle, WA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
- Datchuk, S. M., & Kubina, R. M. (2013). A review of teaching sentence-level writing skills to students with writing difficulties and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448254
- De La Paz, S., Ferretti, R., Wissinger, D., Yee, L., & MacArthur, C. (2012). Adolescents’ disciplinary use of evidence, argumentative strategies, and organizational structure in writing about historical controversies. Written Communication, 29(4), 412–454. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088312461591
- Dede, C., & Barab, S. (2009). Emerging technologies for learning science: A time of rapid advances. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 301–304. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9172-4
- Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, (Vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186). Minneapolis, MN: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., & Connelly, V. (2009). The impact of specific language impairment on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children, 75(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500403
- Duke, N. K. (2005). Comprehension of what for what: Comprehension as a nonunitary construct. In S. G. Paris, and S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 93–104). Routledge.
- Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.
- Educational Testing Service. (2008). CriterionSM online writing evaluation service. https://www.ets.org/criterion
- Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/356602
- Fainberg, J., Bell, P., Lincoln, M., & Renals, S. (2016). Improving children’s speech recognition through out-of-domain data augmentation. In N. Morgan (Ed.), Interspeech (pp. 1598–1602). International Speech Communication Association.
- Fang, Y., Li, T., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). Predicting literacy skills via stealth assessment in a simple vocabulary game. In R. A. Sottilare & J. Schwarz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Human-computer Interaction International Conference. Washington, D.C. (Online): Springer.
- Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 694–702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
- Fishman, B. J., Deterding, S., Vattel, L., Higgen, T., Schenke, K., Sheldon, L., Ewing, C., Homan, C., & Aguilar, S. (2013). Beyond badges & points: Gameful assessment systems for engagement in formal education. In Games, Learning, and Society Conference. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
- Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(3), 229–243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40170791?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
- Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N., & Dooley, S. (2005). Summary street®: Computer support for comprehension and writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/DH8F-QJWM-J457-FQVB
- Galbraith, D., & Torrance, M. (2004). Revision in the context of different drafting strategies. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision of cognitive and instructional processes (Vol. 13, pp. 63–85). Springer.
- Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607
- Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave MacMillan.
- Gil, L., Braten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Stromso, H. I. (2010). Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31(1), 30–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710902733600
- Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C., & Readi, P. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
- Graham, S. (2012a). Introduction to special issue on writing assessment and instruction. Exceptionality, 20(4), 197–198. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.724622
- Graham, S. (2012b). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers. U. S. Department of Education. What Works Clearinghouse
- Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
- Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 35–44. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332
- Graham, S. (2021). A walk through the landscape of writing: Insights from a program of writing research. Educational Psychologist, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1951734
- Graham, S., & Alves, R. A. (2021). Research and teaching writing. Reading and Writing, 34(7), 1613–1621. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10188-9
- Graham, S. L., Bartlett, X., B, N., Harris, C., R, K., Aitken, A., Barkel, A., Kavanaugh, C., & Talukdar, J. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927
- Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012a). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Department of Education.
- Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying a self-regulated strategy development study. Journal of Writing Research, 10(2), 139–187. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2018.10.02.02
- Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 620–633. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
- Graham, S., Harris, K., & Fink-Chorzempa, B. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
- Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 207–241. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001
- Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/681947
- Graham, S., & Herbert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710–744. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
- Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. (2012b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
- Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.
- Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703–1743. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
- Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8(6). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1625/1469
- Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
- Gulikers, J. T. M., Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2008). The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.012
- Guthrie, J. T., Mcrae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237–250. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621087
- Guthrie, J. T., van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C. C., Rice, E. R., Faibisch, F. M., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.3.5
- Hagen, A., Pellom, B., & Cole, R. (2003). Children’s speech recognition with application to interactive books and tutors. In IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (pp. 186–191). St. Thomas, Virgin Islands: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
- Hagen, A., Pellom, B., & Cole, R. (2007). Highly accurate children’s speech recognition for interactive reading tutors using subword units. Speech Communication, 49(12), 861–873. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.05.004
- Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(6), 821–829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.821
- Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Going beyond NLEs to a more balanced approach. Instructional Science, 36(5), 395–408. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9062-9
- Harward, S., Peterson, N., Korth, B., Wimmer, J., Wilcox, B., Morrison, T. G., Black, S., Simmerman, S., & Pierce, L. (2014). Writing instruction in elementary classrooms: Why teachers engage or do not engage students in writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.896959
- Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing process. In C. M. Levy & S. R. Ransdell (Eds.), The sciences of writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28–40). The Guilford Press.
- Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
- Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x
- Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2018). Assessment and learning in an uncertain world. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 25(4), 351–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1507247
- Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Applying NLP metrics to students’ self-explanations. In P. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp. 261–275). IGI Global.
- Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032580
- James, L. T., & Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: Its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behavior. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659
- Johnson, M., & Arthur, A. M., & Language and Reading Research Consortium (LARRC). (2016). Improving the language skills of pre-kindergarten students: Preliminary impacts of the let’s know! Experimental curriculum. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9332-z
- Jones, I. (1994). The effect of a word processor on the written composition of second-grade pupils. Computers in the Schools, 11(2), 43–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v11n02_05
- Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
- Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
- Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
- Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., & Quinlan, T. (2010). Does automated feedback help students learn to write? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.2.c
- Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M. J., & van den Broek, P. (2008). Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00370.x
- Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., Bresina, B., & Wagner, K. (2020). The inferential language comprehension (iLC) framework: Supporting children’s comprehension of visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 256–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12457
- Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015956
- Kerr, K. A., Marsch, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/505057
- Knight, S., Shibani, A., Abel, S., Gibson, A., Ryan, P., Sutton, N., Wight, R., Lucas, C., Sandor, A., Kitto, K., Liu, M., Mogarkar, R. V., & Shum, S. B. (2020). AcaWriter: A learning analytics tool for formative feedback on academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 141–186. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.06
- Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001079
- Kwok, M. N., Ganding, E., III, Hull, G. A., & Moje, E. B. (2016). Sociocultural approaches to high school writing instruction: Examining the roles of context, positionality, and power. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 257–271). Guilford Press.
- Landauer, T. K., & Foltz, P. W. (2007). New LSA education applications at University of Colorado and pearson knowledge technologies. In F. Wild, M. Kalz, J. van Bruggen, & R. Koper (Eds.), Mini-Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Latent Semantic Analysis in Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 13–14). Heerlen, Netherlands.
- Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. W. (2003). Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the intelligent essay assessor. Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 87–112). Erlbaum.
- Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., & Dennis, S. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Psychology Press.
- Liao, S.-F., Liu, J.-C., Hsu, C.-L., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, T.-M., & Cheng, H. (2015). Cognitive development in children with language impairment, and correlation between language and intelligence development in kindergarten children with developmental delay. Journal of Child Neurology, 30(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0883073814535486
- Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
- Lin, S.-J. C., Monroe, B. W., & Troia, G. A. (2007). Development of writing knowledge in grades 2-8: A comparison of typically developing writers and their struggling peers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560701277542
- Llorens, A. C., Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2014). Adaptive formative feedback to improve strategic search decisions in task-oriented reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12050
- Loftus-Rattan, S. M., & Coyne, M. D. (2013). Vocabulary instruction within a multi-tier approach. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.741942
- MacArthur, C. A. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 344–354. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900403
- Magnifico, A. M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer’s audience. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 167–184. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.493470
- Magnifico, A. M. (2012). Audience effects: A bidirectional artifact of adolescents’ creative writing. In J. V. Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 411–415). Sydney, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Many, J. E., Fyfe, R., Lewis, G., & Mitchell, E. (1996). Traversing the topical landscape: Exploring students’ self-directed reading-writing-research processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.1.2
- Mayer, C. (2009). Issues in second language literacy education with learners who are deaf. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050802153368
- McCarthy, P. M., Guess, R. H., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). The components of paraphrase evaluations. Behavioral Research Methods, 41(3), 682–690. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.682
- McCarthy, K. S., Likens, A. D., Johnson, A. M., Guerrero, T. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Metacognitive overload! Positive and negative effects of metacognitive prompts in an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 420–438. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0164-5
- McCarthy, K. S., Roscoe, R. D., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Checking it twice: Does adding spelling and grammar checkers improve essay quality in an automated writing tutor? Proceedings from the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 270–282). Springer.
- McCarthy, K. S., Watanabe, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2020a). The design implementation framework: Guiding principles for the redesign of a reading comprehension intelligent tutoring system. In M. Schmidt, A. Tawfik, Y. Earnshaw, & I. Jahnke (Eds.), Learner and user experience research: An introduction for the field of learning design & technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/ux/9_the_design_impleme
- McCarthy, K. S., Watanabe, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2020b). Personalized learning in iSTART: Past modifications and future design. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1716201
- McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2004). Transforming knowledge into professional development resources: Six teachers implement a model of teaching for understanding text. The Elementary School Journal, 104(5), 391–408. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499759
- McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
- McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., Bresina, B., Slater, S., Wagner, K., White, M. J., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., & Umana, C. (2019). Developing an interactive software application to support young children’s inference-making . L1-Educational Studies in Languages and Literature, 19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2019.19.04.04.
- McMaster, K. L., Shin, J., Espin, C. A., Jung, P.-G., M. M., Wayman, & Deno, S. L. (2017). Monitoring elementary students’ writing progress using curriculum-based measures: Grade and gender differences. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 2069–2091. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9766-9
- McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
- McNamara, D. S. (2017). Self-Explanation and reading strategy training (SERT) improves low-knowledge students’ science course performance. Discourse Processes, 54(7), 479–492. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1101328
- McNamara, D. S. (2020). If integration is the keystone of comprehension: Inferencing is the key. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1788323
- McNamara, D. S., & Allen, L. K. (2017). Toward an integrated perspective of writing as a discourse process. In M. Schober, A. Britt, & D. N. Rapp (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed., pp. 362–389). Routledge.
- McNamara, D. S., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & Balyan, R. (2018). NLP: Getting computers to understand discourse. In K. Millis, D. Long, J. Magliano, & K. Wiemer (Eds.), Deep comprehension: Multi-disciplinary approaches (pp. 224–236). Routledge.
- McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T., Best, R., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE
- Meyer, B. J. F., Middlemiss, W., Theodorou, E., Brezinski, K. L., McDougall, J., & Bartlett, B. J. (2002). Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 486–519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.486
- Meyer, B. J. F., & Wijekumar, K. (2007). A web-based tutoring system for the structure strategy: Theoretical background, design, and findings. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies (pp. 347–374). Psychology Press.
- Meyer, B. J. F., & Wijekumar, K. K. (2016). Intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy: A reading strategy tutor. In S. A. Crossley, and D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 82–103). Routledge.
- Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K., Middlemiss, M., Higley, K., Lei, P.-W., Meier, C., & Spielvogel, S. (2011). Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth- and seventh-grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(1), 62–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.1.4
- Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, & M. Welling (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 3111–3119). Lake Tahoe, NV: Curran Associates Inc.
- Moore, N. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (2012). The effects of being a reader and of observing readers on fifth-grade students’ argumentative writing and revising. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1449–1478. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9327-6
- The Nation’s Report Card. (2012). NAEP 2012: Trends in academic progress. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/main2012/pdf/2013456.pdf
- The Nation’s Report Card. (2019). NAEP report card: 2019 NAEP reading assessment. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2019/
- National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy. https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
- Nicula, B., Dascalu, M., Newton, N. N., Orcutt, E., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). Automated paraphrase quality assessment using recurrent neural networks and language models (SP). In 17th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021) (pp. 333–340). Athens, Greece: Springer.
- Nielsen, K. (2012). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01533.x
- NoRedInk. (2012). https://www.noredink.com
- Oakhill, J. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less skilled comprehenders’ memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 74(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01785.x
- Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children’s comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x
- Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
- Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350020105
- Olinghouse, G. N., Zheng, J., & Morlock, L. (2012). State writing assessment: Inclusion of motivational factors in writing tasks. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632736
- Olive, T. (2014). Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.4
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality & Quantity, 41(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3
- Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M. (2018). Teacher implementation of self-regulated strategy development with an automated writing evaluation system: Effects on the argumentative writing performance of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 255–270. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002
- Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M. (2019). Classroom applications of automated writing evaluation: A qualitative examination of automated feedback. In L. Bailey (Ed.), Educational technology and the new world of persistent learning (pp. 145–175). IGI Global.
- Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
- Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 124–152. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.2
- Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. (2016). The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1098–1120. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000103
- Pearson Education, Inc. (2011). WriteToLearn. https://wtl.pearsonkt.com/
- Pearson, P. D. P., S, A., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.). (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. National Academy of Education.
- Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1532–1543). Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. (2016). The effects of giving feedback on the persuasive writing of fourth- and fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.149
- Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2019). Developing strategic young writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades K-2. Guilford Press.
- Philippakos, Z. A. T., & MacArthur, C. A. (2020). Integrating collaborative reasoning and strategy instruction to improve second graders’ opinion writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1650315
- Pratt, A., & Logan, J., & Language and Reading Research Consortium (LARRC). (2014). Improving language-focused comprehension instruction in primary-grade classrooms: Impacts of the let’s know! Experimental curriculum. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9275-1
- Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosental, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. 3. (pp. 545–561). Erlbaum.
- Proske, A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer-based writing strategy training: Effects on motivation and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 481–505. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2
- Puranik, C. S., & AlOtaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1523–1546. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x
- Purcell-Gates, V., & Tierney, R. (2009). Public policy brief: Increasing literacy levels of Canadian students. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from: http://cpls.educ.ubc.ca/content/pdfs/LiteracyPolicyBrief.pdf
- Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02300540
- Ritchey, K. D., McMaster, K. L., Otaiba, S. A., Puranik, C. S., Kim, Y.-S. G., Parker, D. C., & Ortiz, M. (2015). Indicators of fluent writing in beginning writers. In K. D. Cummings & Y. Petscher (Eds.), The fluency construc (pp. 21–66). Springer.
- Ritterfeld, U., & Weber, R. (2006). Video games for entertainment and education. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 399–413). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Automated writing instruction and feedback: Instructional mode, attitudes, and revising. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 2089–2093). Philadelphia, PA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
- Roscoe, R., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Contrasting writing practice formats in a writing strategy tutoring system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 723–754. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633118763429
- Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Weston, J. L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). The Writing Pal intelligent tutoring system: Usability testing and development. Computers and Composition, 34, 39–59. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.002
- Roscoe, R. D., Brandon, R., Snow, E., & McNamara, D. S. (2013a). Game-based writing strategy practice with the writing Pal. In K. Pytash & R. Ferdig (Eds.), Exploring technology for writing and writing instruction (pp. 1–20). IGI Global. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4341-3.ch001
- Roscoe, R. D., Craig, S. D., & Douglas, I. (2017). End-user considerations in educational technology design. IGI Global.
- Roscoe, R., Jacovina, M. E., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation. T. Barnes, M. Chi, & M. Feng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2016) (pp. 628–629). Raleigh, NC: International Educational Data Mining Society.
- Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Writing pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1010–1025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032340
- Roscoe, R. D., Snow, E. L., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Automated detection of essay revising patterns: Application for intelligent feedback in a writing tutor. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 10(1), 59–79.
- Roscoe, R., Snow, D., L, E., Brandon, R., . D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013b). Educational game enjoyment, perceptions, and features in an intelligent writing tutor. In C. Boonthum-Denecke & G. M. Youngblood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 515–520). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
- Roscoe, R. D., Varner, L. K., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013c). Developing pedagogically-guided algorithms for intelligent writing feedback. International Journal of Learning Technology, 25, 8(4), 362–381. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2013.059131
- Rudner, L. M., Garcia, V., & Welch, C. (2006). An evaluation of IntelliMetricTM essay scoring system. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(4). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1651/1493
- Schunn, C., Godley, A., & DeMartino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP english classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.525
- Shanahan, T. (1987). The shared knowledge of reading and writing. Reading Psychology, 8(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0270271870080205
- Shanahan, T. (1988). The reading-writing relationship: Seven instructional principles. The Reading Teacher, 41(7), 636–647. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20199888
- Shermis, M. D. (2010). Automated essay scoring in a high stakes testing environment. In V. J. Shute & B. J. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment for the 21st century (pp. 167–185). Springer.
- Shermis, M. D. (2014). State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration. Assessing Writing, 20, 53–76. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001
- Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J., Elliot, N., Miel, S., & Foltz, P. W. (2016). Automated writing evaluation: An expanding body of knowledge. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 395–409). The Guilford Press.
- Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J., Higgins, D., & Zechner, K. (2010). Automated essay scoring: Writing assessment and instruction. International Encyclopedia of Education, 4(1), 20–26.
- Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
- Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer Games and Instruction, 55(2), 503–524.
- Shute, V., & Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth assessment: Measuring and supporting learning in video games. The MIT Press.
- Shute, V. J., Wang, L., Greiff, S., Zhao, W., & Moore, G. (2016). Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 106–117. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.047
- Simmons, J. (2003). Responders are taught, not born. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(8), 684–693. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40017173
- Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
- Snow, E. L., Jacovina, M. E., Jackson, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). iSTART-2: A reading comprehension and strategy instruction tutor. In S. A. Crossley, and D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 104–121). Routledge.
- Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2019). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132–2148. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
- Spilling, E. F., Rønneberg, V., Rogne, W. M., Roeser, J., & Torrance, M. (2021). Handwriting versus keyboarding: Does writing modality affect quality of narratives written by beginning writers? Reading and Writing, 35, 129–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10169-y
- Steinkeuhler, C. (2006). Virtual worlds, learning, & the new pop cosmopolitanism. Teachers College Record. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12843
- Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007
- Stone, M., Kent, K. M., Roscoe, R. D., Corley, K. M., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). The design implementation framework: Iterative design from the lab to the classroom. In R. Roscoe, S. D. Craig, & I. Douglas (Eds.), End-user considerations in educational technology design (pp. 76–98). IGI Global.
- Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
- Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
- Turnitin. (2016). Feedback studio. https://www.turnitin.com/products/feedback-studio.https://www.turnitin.com/products/features/draft-coach
- The U.S. Department of Education. (2008). The condition of education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008031.pdf
- van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W. (2006). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An online study. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Ed.), Studies in writing: Writing and interest (Vol. 20, pp. 125–150). Elsevier.
- van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J., Butler, J., White, M. J., & Lorch, E. P. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. G. Paris, and S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107–130). Routledge.
- Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430709336632
- Vogel, J. J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Cannon-Bowers, J., & Bowers, C. A. (2006). Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782475
- Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_3
- Wang, E. L., Matsumura, L. C., Correnti, R., Litman, D., Zhang, H., Howe, E., Magooda, A., & Quinana, R. (2020). eRevis (ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system. Assessing Writing, 44, 100449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449
- Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008). Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15544800701771580
- Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr190oa
- Weston, J. L. (2015). The impact of strategy instruction on source-based essay writing. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest. (3718880).
- Wigfield, A., Mason-Singh, A., Ho, A. N., & Guthrie, J. T. (2014). Intervening to improve children’s reading motivation and comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. In S. Karabenick, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Motivational interventions: Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 18, pp. 37–70). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 987–1013. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9263-4
- Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 741–760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000168
- Williams, J. P., Stafford, K. B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013152
- Wilson, J. (2017). Associated effects of automated essay evaluation software on growth in writing quality for students with and without disabilities. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 691–718. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9695-z
- Wilson, J., & Andrada, G. N. (2016). Using automated feedback to improve writing quality: Opportunities and challenges. In Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, & M. Mosharraf (Eds.), Handbook of research on technology tools for real-world skill development (pp. 679–704). IGI Global.
- Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, S., Estock, J. L., Orvis, K. L., & Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 217–266. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046878108321866
- Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004
- Wilson, J., Olinghouse, N. G., & Andrada, G. N. (2014). Does automated feedback improve writing quality? Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(1), 93–118.
- Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830764
- Wilson, J., Roscoe, R., & Ahmed, Y. (2017). Automated formative writing assessment using a levels of language framework. Assessing Writing, 34, 16–36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.002
- Yan, D., Rupp, A. A., & Foltz, P. W. (2020). Handbook of automated scoring: Theory into practice. Taylor & Francis Group.
- Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654312436980