References
- Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students’ science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611003672348
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos 18 [Computer software]. SmallWaters.
- Beidel, D., Turner, S., & Taylor-Ferreira, J. C. (1999). Teaching test-taking strategies to elementary school students. Behavior Modification, 23(4), 630–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445599234007
- Burton, R. F. (2002). Misinformation, partial knowledge and guessing in true/false tests. Medical Education, 36(9), 805–811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01299.x
- Cohen, A. D. (2006). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(4), 307–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701333129
- Cohen, A. D. (2012). Test-taking strategies. In C. Coombre, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to assessment (pp. 96–104). Cambridge University Press.
- Dodeen, H. (2008). Assessing test-taking strategies of university students: Developing a scale and estimating its psychometric indices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 409–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701562874
- Dodeen, H. (2015). Teaching test-taking strategies: Importance and techniques. Psychology Research, 5(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2015.02.003
- Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated and reflective. Instructional Science, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156001
- Higham, P. A., & Gerrard, C. (2005). Not all errors are created equal: Metacognition and changing answers on multiple-choice tests. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087457
- Hong, E., Sas, M., & Sas, J. C. (2006). Test-taking strategies of high and low mathematics achievers. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.3.144-155
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
- Kim, Y., & Goetz, E. T. (1993). Strategic processing of test questions: The test marking responses of college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 5(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(93)90003-B
- Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and performance: A self-regulatory analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(2), 101–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970209599501
- Millman, J., Bishop, C. H., & Ebel, R. (1965). An analysis of test-wiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 707–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446502500304
- Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modelling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modelling, 7(4), 557–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0704_3
- Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Item review and the rearrangement procedure. Its process and its results. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(4), 303–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500110521
- Papanastasiou, E. C. (2015). Psychometric changes on item difficulty due to item review by examinees. Practical Assessment. Research & Evaluation, 20(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7275/jcyv-k456
- Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. D. (2007). A ‘rearrangement procedure’ for scoring adaptive tests with review options. International Journal of Testing, 7(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050701632262
- Peng, Y., Hong, E., & Mason, E. (2014). Motivational and cognitive test-taking strategies and their influence on test performance in mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(5), 366–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.966115
- Rogers, W. T., & Bateson, D. J. (1991). Verification of a model of test-taking behavior of high school seniors. Journal of Experimental Education, 59(4), 331–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1991.10806571
- Sarnacki, R. E. (1979). An examination of test-wiseness in the cognitive test domain. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 252–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002252
- Schutz, P. A., & Davis, H. A. (2000). Emotions and self-regulation during test-taking. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_03
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Teaching test-taking skills: Helping students show what they know. Brookline Books.
- Stellwagen, J. B. (1997). Phase two: Using student learning profiles to develop cognitive self-assessment skills. American Secondary Education, 26(2), 1–5. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41064383
- Stenlund, T., Eklöf, H., & Lyrén, P.-E. (2016). Group differences in test-taking behavior: An example from high stakes testing program. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1142935
- Stylianou-Georgiou, A., & Papanastasiou, E. (2017). Answer changing in testing situations: The role of metacognition in deciding which answers to review. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(3–4), 102–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1390479
- Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306
- Vattanapath, R., & Jaiprayoon, K. (1999). An assessment of the effectiveness of teaching test-taking strategies for multiple-choice English reading comprehension tests. Occasional Papers, 8, 57–71.
- Vispoel, W. P. (1998). Reviewing and changing answers on computer-adaptive and self-adaptive vocabulary tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35(4), 328–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1998.tb00542.x
- Waddell, D. L., & Blankenship, J. C. (1994). Answer changing: A meta-analysis of the prevalence and patterns. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 25(4), 155–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19940701-06
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29