More is not always better: the nonlinear relationship between formative assessment strategies and reading achievement

References

• Afflerbach, P. (2016). Reading assessment. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., Crassas, M., & Kim, J. (2018). Best practices in reading assessment. In N. K. Duke & J. R. Del Nero (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 337–359). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, L., & Zamarro, G. (2020). The role of student effort on performance in PISA: Revisiting the gender gap in achievement. Education Reform Faculty and Graduate Students Publications, Issue. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/edrepub/116
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2018). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asadullah, M. N., Perera, L. D. H., & Xiao, S. (2020, 09 01). Vietnam’s extraordinary performance in the PISA assessment: A cultural explanation of an education paradox. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(5), 913–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardo, A. B., Cai, Y., & King, R. B. (2021). Society‐level social axiom moderates the association between growth mindset and achievement across cultures. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), e12411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A role for summative assessment? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050106
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. Formative assessment – an optimistic but incomplete vision. (2015, 01 02). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. Assessment and classroom learning. (1998, 03 01). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
   Google Scholar
• Box, C. (2019). Formative assessment in United States classrooms. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2020). Examining the interaction among components of English for specific purposes ability in reading: The triple-decker model. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2022). Island Ridge Curve: An invisible hand behind self-regulated learning. SSRL SIG Newsletter (Spring 2022), 41, 10–11. https://ssrlsite.files.wordpress.com/2022/05/ssrl_spring_2022_newsletter_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Chen, H. (2022). The fluctuating effect of thinking on language performance: New evidence for the Island Ridge Curve. Language assessment quarterly, 19(5), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2080553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., King, R., & McInerney, D. M. (2022). The concurrent trajectories of utility value, metacognitive strategy use, and English achievement: A multivariate growth modeling analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2053496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Kunnan, A. J. (2019). Detecting the language thresholds of the effect of background knowledge on a Language for Specific Purposes reading performance: A case of the island ridge curve. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Kunnan, A. J. (2020). Mapping the fluctuating effect of strategy use ability on English reading performance for nursing students: A multi-layered moderation analysis approach. Language Testing, 37(2), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219893384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Yang, Y. (2022). The fluid relation between reading strategies and mathematics learning: A perspective of the Island Ridge Curve. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-Heritage settings. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Hu, J. (2020). Synergistic effects of instruction and affect factors on high- and low-ability disparities in elementary students’ reading literacy. Reading and Writing, 34(1), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10070-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., & McBride Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckor, B., & Holmberg, C. (2017). Mastering formative assessment moves: 7 high-leverage practices to advance student learning. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Frønes, T. S., Rasmusson, M., & Bremholm, J. (2020). Equity and diversity in reading comprehension—a case study of PISA 2000–2018. In T. S. Frønes, A. Pettersen, J. Radišić, & N. Buchholtz (Eds.), Equity, equality and diversity in the Nordic model of education (pp. 305–335). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61648-9_12
   Google Scholar
• Gillis, S., Polesel, J., & Wu, M. PISA Data: Raising concerns with its use in policy settings. (2016, 03 01). The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0183-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greyling, W., Ahmad, F., & Wallace, N. (2020). Reading assessment as developmental tracking: A Vygotskyan perspective. In H. (30 June ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (1990, 01 01). Examination result attribution, Expectancy and achievement goals among Chinese students in Hong Kong. Educational Studies, 16(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569900160102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooley, D. S., & Thorpe, J. (2017). The effects of formative reading assessments closely linked to classroom texts on high school reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1215–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9514-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. -A. Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the programme for international student assessment. (2018, 05 04). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. S., Conradi, K., & Amendum, S. J. (2016). Matching interventions to reading needs: A case for differentiation. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. J. (2016). Exploring the influence of culture on assessment: The case of teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Confucian-heritage societies. In G. Brown & L. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and social conditions of assessment (pp. 404–419). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta‐analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R. (2016). Implementing assessment for learning in a Confucian context: The case of Hong Kong 2004–14. The Sage Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, 2, 756–771. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921405
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020). The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 33(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. (2016). How is formative assessment related to students’ reading achievement? Findings from PISA 2009. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1139543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2019). Structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 445–456). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. Q. (19982018). Mplus 8.2 [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nalipay, M. J. N., Cai, Y., & King, R. B. (2020). Why do girls do better in reading than boys? How parental emotional contagion explains gender differences in reading achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 57(2), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, B., Van Damme, J., Gielen, S., Vanlaar, G., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2016, 09 02). What makes the difference in reading achievement? Comparisons between Finland and Shanghai. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(5), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1062413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264062658-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment [Article]. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930687
   Google Scholar
• Rubie Davies, C. (2014). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761251
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Shore, J. R., Wolf, M. -K., & Heritage, M. (2016). A case study of formative assessment to support teaching of reading comprehension for English learners. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 5(2), 4. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=jeri
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2009). The cultural practice of reading and the standardized assessment of reading instruction: When incommensurate worlds collide. Educational Researcher, 38(7), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09347583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, K. A. D., Flanigan, K., & McKenna, M. C. (2020). Assessment for reading instruction. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thanh Pham, T. H., & Renshaw, P. (2015). Formative assessment in Confucian Heritage Culture classrooms: Activity theory analysis of tensions, contradictions and hybrid practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.886325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Cai, Y., Zhao, M., & You, X. (2021). Disentangling the relation between motivation regulation strategy and writing performance: A perspective of the Island Ridge Curve. Foreign Languages World (Chinese), 204(3), xxx. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-WYJY202103007.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. (2018, 11 02). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1401526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixson, K. K. (2017). An interactive view of reading comprehension: Implications for assessment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y. Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q., King, R., & Cai, Y. (2022). Emotional contagion: A cross-cultural exploration of how teachers’ enjoyment facilitates achievement via students’ enjoyment. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02878-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021, 03 01). Assessment for learning in the Hong Kong assessment reform: A case of policy borrowing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., & Cai, Y. (2021). Teachers’ Instruction of Reading Strategies and Primary School Students’ Reading Literacy: An Approach of Multilevel Structural Equation Modelling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1923100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Yang, L., & Song, B. R. (2021). Interplay between students’ perceived utility, accountability, self-efficacy and social awareness when engaged withr peer feedback: A qualitative interpretation. In Z. Yan & L. Yang (Eds.), Assessment as Learning Maximising Opportunities for Student Learning and Achievement (pp. 79–97). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., King, R. B., & Haw, J. Y. (2021). Formative assessment, growth mindset, and achievement: Examining their relations in the East and the West. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(5–6), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2021.1988510
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, S. S., King, R. B., Nalipay, M. J. N., & Cai, Y. (2022). Exploring the interplay between socioeconomic status and reading achievement: An expectancy‐value perspective. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), e12495. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, G. (2020). A prism of the educational utopia: The East Asian Educational Model, reference society, and reciprocal learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1714547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar