Lessons from a disciplined response to COVID 19 disruption to education: beginning the journey from reliability to resilience

References

• Allen, A. (2011). Michael young’s the rise of the meritocracy: A philosophical critique. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.582852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnot, M., McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Reay, D. (2004). Consultation in the classroom: Developing dialogue about teaching and learning. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, J. G., Jaspers, M., Joosten ten Brinke, D., & Hui, S. K. F. (2021). Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1901641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, M. D., & Skrbiš, Z. (2008). Constructing Singapore: Elitism, ethnicity and the nation-building project. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bellows, T. (2009). Meritocracy and the Singapore political system. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370902767581
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong City.
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, Y. M. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12(3), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789808666748
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneen, C., Fulmer, G. W., Brown, G. T. L., Tan, K., Leong, W. S., & Tay, H. Y. (2019). Value, practice and proficiency: Teachers’ complex relationship with assessment for learning. Teacher and Teacher Education, 80, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1992). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 90–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, G. (2010). Speech by Ms Grace Fu, Senior Minister of State. Ministry of National Development and Ministry of Education, at the PERI Holistic Assessment Seminar 2010 on Tuesday. [accessed 2022 Dec 27]. http://www.slideshare.net/moeccd/peri-holistic-assessment-seminar-2010-presentation-slides
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, R., Joynes, V., Cooper, J., Boursicot, K., & Roberts, T. (2020). Could COVID-19 be our ‘There is no alternative’ (TINA) opportunity to enhance assessment? Medical Teacher, 42(7), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, A. S., Diefendorff, J. M., & Erickson, R. J. (2011). The relations of daily task accomplishment satisfaction with changes in affect: A multilevel study in nurses. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinathan, S. (2001). Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore. In J. Tan, S. Gopinathan, & W. K. Ho (Eds.), Challenges facing the Singapore education system today (pp. 21-36). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. (1992). What can we do for you? What can “we” do for “you”?: Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54–73). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, R., Putwain, D. W., Määttä, S., Ahonen, T., & Kiuru, N. (2020). The role of academic buoyancy and emotions in students’ learning-related expectations and behaviours in primary school. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 948–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, S., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Khin, M. A., Loo, S. C., Sheng, Y. Z., & Luo, W. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3002
   Google Scholar
• Ho, L. C., Sim, J. B. Y., & Alviar-Martin, T. (2011). Interrogating differentiated citizenship education: Students’ perceptions of democracy, rights and governance in two Singapore schools. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 6(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197911417417
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018). Facilitating students’ active engagement with feedback. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (Cambridge handbooks in psychology) (pp. 531–553). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.026
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-aged distance students’ transition to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for Learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319646
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E., Sudom, K. A., & Zamorski, M. A. (2013). Longitudinal analysis of psychological resilience and mental health in Canadian military personnel returning from overseas deployment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, S. C. (2020). Elements of a Standards-referenced Assessment. In SEAB assessment in Singapore: Getting ready for the 2020s (pp. 11–16). Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, W. S., & Tan, K. (2014). What (more) can, and should, assessment do for learning? Observations from ‘successful learning context’ in Singapore. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 593–619, 1.035. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.970207
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. (2010). Silence in the Context of ‘Child Voice’. Children & Society, 24(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism, and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.711294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim-Ratnam, C. (2013). Tensions in defining quality pre-school education: The Singapore context. Educational Review, 65(4), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.707641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009a). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 15(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009b). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2007). Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2018). In defence of tokenism? Implementing children’s right to participate in collective decision-making. Childhood, 25(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218777292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutha, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 857–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579400004156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millican, R., Ahmed Shafi, A., Templeton, S., & Middleton, T. (2020). Using assessment feedback to develop resilience. In A. ahmed Shafi, T. Middleton, R. Millican, & S. Templeton (Eds.), Reconsidering Resilience in Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49236-6_9
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2019). Updates to PSLE 2021 scoring system – enabling students to progress, regardless of starting points. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/updates-to-psle-2021-scoring-system–enabling-students-to-progress–regardless-of-starting-points
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Selvaretnam, G. (2022). Making internal feedback explicit: Harnessing the comparisons students make during two-stage exams. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jrc6y
   Google Scholar
• PERI Report. (2009). Report of the Primary Education Review and Implementation Committee. Ministry of Education
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, S., & Owen, S. (2014). Freedom to grow: Children’s perspectives of student voice. Childhood Education, 90(3), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.910367
   Google Scholar
• Rahmat, F. A., & Wong, H. M. (2017, June). Analysing the nature of feedback in classrooms in Singapore<italic/>. Paper presented at the 7th Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., & Seo, M. -G. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. P. (2008). Meritocracy and Elitism in a Global City: Ideological Shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 29(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107083445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. (2011). Assessment for learning in Singapore: Unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9096-z
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. (2013). A framework for assessment for learning: Implications for feedback practices within and beyond the gap. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2013, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/640609
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. (2017). Asking questions of (what) assessment (should do) for learning: The case of bite-sized assessment for learning in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 16(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-016-9196-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K., & Deneen, C. C. (2015). Aligning and sustaining meritocracy, curriculum and assessment validity in Singapore. Assessment Matters, 8, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0003
   Google Scholar
• Teng, A. (2016, July 14) PSLE scoring revamp: T-score replaced by eight wider grade bands in 2021, Straits Times, Available at
   Google Scholar
• To, J. (2016). ‘This is not what I need’: Conflicting assessment feedback beliefs in a post-secondary institution in Hong Kong. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). (2009), General Comment no. 12, The Right of the Child to be Heard (CRC/C/GC/12),
   Google Scholar
• Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M. N., Perez, A. L. U., Harms, P. D., & Lester, P. B. (2016). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 278–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volante, L., DeLuca, C., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Stobart, M., Tan, C., Heritage, G., Schneider, K. H. K., Wyatt-Smith, C., Tan, K., & Wyatt‐smith, C. (2020). Synergy and tension between large-scale and classroom assessment: International trends. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(4), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12382
   Google Scholar
• Welty, E., & Lundy, L. (2013). A children’s rights-based approach to involving children in decision making. Journal of Science Communication, 12(3), C02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.12030302
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (1958). The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870-2033: An essay on education and society. Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, L. S., & Chow, H. K. (2020). Standards-referenced Assessment. In SEAB assessment in Singapore: Getting ready for the 2020s (pp. 1–7). Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board.
   Google Scholar