An exploratory field study of students’ memory for written feedback comments

References

• Brooks, C., Carroll, A., Gillies, R. M., & Hattie, J. (2019). A matrix of feedback for learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T., Peterson, E. R., & Yao, E. S. (2016). Student conceptions of feedback: Impact on self‐regulation, self‐efficacy, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 606–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. (2012). Can the effectiveness of different forms of feedback be measured? Retention and student preference for written and verbal feedback in level 4 bioscience students. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.702676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 604–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory. Psychological science, 12(6), 457–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutumisu, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2018). The impact of critical feedback choice on students’ revision, performance, learning, and memory. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 351–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2016). Eliminating unnecessary workload around marking: Report of the independent workload review group. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/511256/Eliminating-unnecessary-workload-around-marking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elfering, A., Grebner, S., & Wehr, S. (2012). Loss of feedback information given during oral presentations. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.66
   Google Scholar
• Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Fishbach, A. (2019). Not learning from failure—the greatest failure of all. Psychological Science, 30(12), 1733–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 88–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19(5), 1211–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, S.E.A., Winstone, N.E., Ridout, N., & Nash, R.A. (2020). Weak memory for future-oriented feedback: Investigating the roles of attention and improvement focus. Memory, 28(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1709507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y. (2017). Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System, 69, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2019). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Crivelli, J., Van Gompel, K., West-Smith, P., & Wike, K. (2021). Feedback that leads to improvement in student essays: Testing the hypothesis that “where to next” feedback is most powerful. Frontiers in Education, 6, 645758.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. (2017). The feedback fix: Dump the past, embrace the future, and lead the way to change. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2016). Establishing an information avoidance scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(12), 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving, S. E., & Peterson, E. R. (2006). Conceptions of Feedback (CoF) inventory (Version 2). University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuepper-Tetzel, C. E., & Gardner, P. L. (2021). Effects of temporary mark withholding on academic performance. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(3), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725721999958
   Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., Lopera-Oquendo, C., & Cerdán, R. (2024). Examining pre-service teachers’ feedback on low-and high-quality written assignments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 36(2), 225–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022). The next black box of formative assessment: A model of the internal mechanisms of feedback processing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 751548. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751548
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Memory & Cognition, 36, 716–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensink, P. J., & King, K. (2020). Student access of online feedback is modified by the availability of assessment marks, gender and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 10–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., & Winstone, N. E. (2017). Responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of assessment feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., Winstone, N. E., & Gregory, S. E. (2021). Selective memory searching does not explain the poor recall of future-oriented feedback. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 467–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., Winstone, N. E., Gregory, S. E. A., & Papps, E. (2018). A memory advantage for past-oriented over future-oriented performance feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(12), 1864–1879. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterbur, M. E., Hammer, E. Y., & Hammer, E. (2015). Does mechanism matter? Student recall of electronic versus handwritten feedback. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 9, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2023). Toward a paradigm shift in feedback research: Five further steps influenced by self-regulated learning theory. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2223642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Factor validation of the consideration of future consequences scale: Evidence for a short version. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(4), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, G., & Richardson, R. (Eds.). (2019). Reducing teachers’ marking workload and developing pupils’ learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, I., Reimann, N., & Sambell, K. (2023). Feedforward practices: A systematic review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., Green, J. D., Saunders, J., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. (2016). Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 1–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, J. M., Klein, W. M., Ferrer, R. A., Lewis, K. L., Harris, P. R., Shepperd, J. A., & Biesecker, L. G. (2015). Information avoidance tendencies, threat management resources, and interest in genetic sequencing feedback. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(4), 616–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Borght, L., Schouppe, N., & Notebaert, W. (2016). Improved memory for error feedback. Psychological Research, 80, 1049–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Hepper, E. G., & Nash, R. A. (2021). Individual differences in self-reported use of assessment feedback: The mediating role of feedback beliefs. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 844–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Nash, R. A. (2023). Toward a cohesive psychological science of effective feedback. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2224444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., & Winstone, N. (2021). Harnessing the learning potential of feedback: Dedicated Improvement and Reflection Time (DIRT) in classroom practice. In Y. Zi and Y. Lan (Eds.), Assessment as learning: Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement (pp. 206–216). Routledge.
   Google Scholar