Lawyer rankings either do not matter for litigation outcomes or are redundant

References

• Abel, R.L. (2003) English Lawyers Between Market and State: The Politics of Professionalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, D.S. & Yoon, A.H. (2007) The luck of the draw: using random case assignment to investigate attorney ability, University of Chicago Law Review, 74(4), pp. 1145–1177. doi: 10.2307/20141859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. & Heaton, P. (2011) How much difference does the lawyer make? The effect of defense counsel on murder case outcomes, RAND Working Papers, (WR-870-NIJ).
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, M. (2014) A selection bias approach to sensitivity analysis for causal effects, Political Analysis, 22(2), pp. 169–182. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpt006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, R.J. (1976) Measuring the quality of legal services: an idea whose time has not come, Law & Society Review, 11(2), pp. 287–317. doi: 10.2307/3053121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, T. (2007) The ratings game, American Bar Association Journal, 93, pp. 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Clermont, K. & Eisenberg, T. (2002) Plaintiphobia in the appellate courts: civil rights really do differ from negotiable instruments?, University of Illinois Law Review, 2002, pp. 947–977.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W.N. & Sauder, M. (2007) Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds, American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), pp. 1–40. doi: 10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007) Is there a (viable) crucial-case method?, Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), pp. 231–253. doi: 10.1177/0010414006290784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R.D., Lazos, S.R. & Waters, M.M. (2011) Are judicial performance evaluations fair to women and minorities? A cautionary tale from Clark county, Nevada, Law & Society Review, 45(3), pp. 731–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Granhag, P.A., Hartwig, M. & Loftus, E.F. (2010) Insightful or wishful: lawyers’ ability to predict case outcomes, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(2), pp. 133–157. doi: 10.1037/a0019060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, R., Dearden, J.A. & Llilien, G.L. (2008) The university rankings game, The American Statistician, 62(3), 232–237. doi: 10.1198/000313008X332124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haire, S.B., Lindquist, S.A. & Hartley, R. (1999) Attorney expertise, litigant success, and judicial decision-making in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Law & Society Review, 33(3), pp. 667–685. doi: 10.2307/3115107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanretty, C. (2013) Haves and have-nots before the Law Lords, Political Studies, 62(3), pp. 686–697. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, S.L. & Sill, K.L. (2007) Experienced advocates and litigation outcomes: repeat players in the South African Supreme Court of Appeal, Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), pp. 443–453. doi: 10.1177/1065912907305683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K.-C., Chen, K.-P. & Lin, C.-C. (2010) Does the type of criminal defense counsel affect case outcomes?: a natural experiment in Taiwan, International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), pp. 113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T.R., Wahlbeck, P.J. & Spriggs, J.F. (2006) The influence of oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court, American Political Science Review, 100(1), pp. 99–113. doi: 10.1017/S0003055406062034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritzer, H.M. (2003) The government gorilla, in: Herbert M. Kritzer & Susan S. Silbey (Eds) Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press), pp. 342–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kuersten, A. & Hurwitz, M.S. (2007) Extending the multi-user database of decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals 1997-2002. Database. Available at: http://www.wmich.edu/nsf-coa/
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K.M. (1995) The Sociology of the Professions (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, P. (1993) Party capability theory and appellate success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–1992, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 26(3), pp. 523–540. doi: 10.1017/S0008423900003437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, K.T. (1995) Repeat players in the Supreme Court: the role of experienced lawyers in litigation success, The Journal of Politics, 57(1), pp. 187–196. doi: 10.2307/2960277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, K.T. (1998) Explaining executive success in the US Supreme Court, Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), pp. 505–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R., Sherr, A. & Paterson, A. (1994) Judging on results? Outcome measures: quality, strategy, and the search for objectivity, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 1(2), pp. 191–210. doi: 10.1080/09695958.1994.9960375
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R., Sherr, A. & Paterson, A. (2003a) Contesting professionalism: legal aid and nonlawyers in England and Wales, Law & Society Review, 37(4), pp. 765–808. doi: 10.1046/j.0023-9216.2003.03704003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R., Sherr, A. & Paterson, A. (2003b) What clients know: client perspectives and legal competence, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 10(1), pp. 5–35. doi: 10.1080/0969595032000130332
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, A.P. & Henderson, W.D. (2008) Measuring outcomes: post-graduation measures of success in the US News & World Report Law School Rankings, Ind. LJ, 83(3), pp. 791–834.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Fair Trading. (2001) Competition in the professions: a report by the director-general of fair trading. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dca.gov.uk/consult/general/oftreptconc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Petroni, C. (2007) Third-party ratings as modern reputational information: how rules of professional conduct could better serve lower-income legal consumers, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(1), pp. 197–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pischke, J.S. & Angrist, J.D. (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D.E. (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who's in charge? (New York, Russell Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D.E. (1976) Evaluating the competence of lawyers, Law and Society Review, 11(2), pp. 257–285. doi: 10.2307/3053120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder, M. & Lancaster, R. (2006) Do rankings matter? The effects of U.S. News & World Report Rankings on the admissions process of law schools, Law & Society Review, 40(1), pp. 105–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, M., Mouritsen, J. & Gabrielsen, G. (2001) Sticky reputation: analyzing a ranking system, Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), pp. 24–41. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540130
   Google Scholar
• Sen, M. (2014) How judicial qualification ratings may disadvantage minority and female candidates, Journal of Law and Courts, 2(1), pp. 33–65. doi: 10.1086/674579
   Google Scholar
• Shinall, J.B. (2010) Slipping away from justice: the effect of attorney skill on trial outcomes, Vanderbilt Law Review, 63(1), pp. 267–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. (2000) The ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’: an empirical study of the rational actor and party capability hypotheses in the High Court 1948–99, Australian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), pp. 255–274. doi: 10.1080/713649335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, D.R. (1998) The multi-user database on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1925-1996.
   Google Scholar
• Szmer, J., Johnson, S.W. & Sarver, T.A. (2007) Does the lawyer matter? Influencing outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada, Law & Society Review, 41(2), pp. 279–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, W.A. & Keren, G.B. (1986) Does the expert know? The reliability of predictions and confidence ratings of experts, in: E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini & D.D. Woods (Eds) Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments (Berlin, Springer), pp. 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharias, F.C. (2008) Effects of reputation on the legal profession, Washington & Lee Law Review, 65(1), pp. 173–212.
   Google Scholar