THE LIMITS OF THE SPHERES

bibliography

• Assheuer, Thomas. “Das Zarathustra-Projekt: Der Philosoph Peter Sloterdijk fordert eine gentechnische Revision der Menschheit.” Die Zeit 2 Dec. 1999: 31–32. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, Dario. Introduzione a Peter Sloterdijk. Il mondo come co-esistenza. Genova: Il Melangolo, 2017. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, Jean-Pierre. Sloterdijk. Cambridge: Polity, 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, Johnathan. 24/7. Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Duclos, Vincent. “Falling into Things: Peter Sloterdijk, Ontological Anthropology in the Monstrous.” New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics 95 (2019): 37–53. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. The Future of Human Nature. Trans. Ella Beister, Max Pensky, and William Rehg. Cambridge: Polity, 2003. 1–23. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology.” The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Garland, 1977. 3–49. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Janicka, Iwona. “Are these Bubbles Anarchist? Peter Sloterdijk’s Spherology and the Question of Anarchism.” Anarchist Studies 24.1 (2016): 62–84. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lucci, Antonio. Un’acrobatica del pensiero. La filosofia dell’esercizio di Peter Sloterdijk. Rome: Aracne, 2014. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Macho, Thomas. Vorbilder. Munich: Fink, 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Macho, Thomas, and Peter Sloterdijk, eds. Weltrevolution der Seele. Ein Lese- und Arbeitsbuch der Gnosis von der Spätantike bis zur Gegenwart. Zürich: Artemis, 1991. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mendieta, Eduardo. “A Letter on Überhumanismus: Beyond Posthumanism and Transhumanism.” Sloterdijk Now. Ed. Stuart Elden. Cambridge: Polity, 2016. 58–76. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, Reinhard. “Züchter des Übermenschen.” Der Spiegel 6 Sep. 1999: 268–69. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, Marie-Eve. “Cohabitating in the Globalised World: Peter Sloterdijk’s Global Foams and Bruno Latour’s Cosmopolitics.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27.1 (2009): 58–72. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1068/d4908>.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlmann, Heiner. The Nature of Cultures: A Blueprint for a Theory of Culture Genetics. Trans. Robert Payne. Vienna: Springer, 1996. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Nennen, Heinz-Ulrich. Philosophie in Echtzeit. Die Sloterdijk–Debatte: Chronik einer Inszenierung. Würzburg: Könighausen, 2003. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterling, Henk. “Interest and Excess of Modern Man’s Radical Mediocrity: Rescaling Sloterdijk’s Grandiose Aesthetic Strategy.” Cultural Politics 3 (2007): 357–80. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rovatti, Pier Aldo. “Esercizi, ma senza ascesi.” aut aut 355 (2012): 7–18. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “The Anthropocene – A Stage in the Process on the Margins of the Earth’s History?” What Happened in the 20th Century? Trans. Christopher Turner. Cambridge: Polity, 2018. 1–23. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Der starke Grund zusammen zu sein. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Derrida, an Egyptian. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge: Polity, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Die nehmende Hand und die gebende Seite. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2010. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “The Domestication of Being.” Not Saved. Essays after Heidegger. Trans. Ian Alexander Moore and Christopher Turner. Cambridge: Polity, 2017. 89–148. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. God’s Zeal. The Battle of the Three Monotheisms. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge: Polity, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Im selben Boot. Versuch über die Hyperpolitik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “Ist die Welt verneinbar? Über den Geist Indiens und die abendländische Gnosis.” Weltfremdheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993. 213–66. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “La Musique Retrouvée.” The Aesthetic Imperative. Writings on Art. Trans. Karen Margolis. Cambridge: Polity, 2017. 3–14. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Literatur und Organisation von Lebenserfahrung: Autobiographien der Zwanziger Jahre. Munich: Hanser, 1979. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “The Plunge and the Turn. Speech on Heidegger’s Thinking in Motion.” Not Saved. Essays after Heidegger. Trans. Ian Alexander Moore and Christopher Turner. Cambridge: Polity, 2017. 1–48. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Polyloquien. Ein Brevier von Peter Sloterdijk. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2018. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Rage and Time. A Psychopolitical Investigation. Trans. Mario Wenning. New York: Columbia UP, 2008. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “Regeln für den Menschenpark. Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über den Humanismus.” Nicht gerettet. Versuche nach Heidegger. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2001. 302–37. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “Rules for the Human Park.” Not Saved. Essays after Heidegger. Trans. Ian Alexander Moore and Christopher Turner. Cambridge: Polity, 2017. 193–216. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Spheres I. Bubbles, Microspherology. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Pasadena: Semiotext(e), 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Spheres III. Foams, Plural Spherology. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Pasadena: Semiotext(e), 2016. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. Stress and Freedom. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge: Polity, 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “What Does a Human Have that He can Give Away?” Giving and Taking. Antidotes to a Culture of Greed. Ed. Joke Brouwer and Sjoerd van Tuinen. Rotterdam: V2, 2014. 9–26. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “Wohin gehen die Mönche? Über Weltflucht in anthropologischer Sicht.” Weltfremdheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993. 80–117. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. “Wozu Drogen? Zur Dialektik von Weltflucht und Weltsucht.” Weltfremdheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1993. 118–60. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter. You Must Change Your Life. On Anthropotechnics. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, Peter, and Hans-Jürgen Heinrichs. Neither Sun nor Death. Trans. Steve Corcoran. New York: Semiotext(e), 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, Thomas. “Ontological Co-belonging in Peter Sloterdijk’s Spherological Philosophy of Mediation.” Paragraph 40.2 (2017): 133–52. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, Thomas. “Peter Sloterdijk and the ‘Security Architecture of Existence’: Immunity, Autochthony, and Ontological Negativism.” Theory, Culture & Society 36.7–8 (2019): 193–214. doi:10.1177/0263276419839119. Web.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel. “Different Atmospheres: Of Sloterdijk, China, and Site.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27.1 (2009): 119–38. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1068/d6808>.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar