A review on correlation, heritability and selection in silkworm breeding

References

• Ahmadi Shahrakht M, Farhangfar H, Bashtani M, Shadparvar A, Akbaari MK. 2012. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk trait at different milking times for Holstein cow of Khorasan Razavi using a random egression test day model. Iranian J Anim Sci Res. 4:20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan MK, Ramian SM. 2008. Genetic variability and correlation analysis in hybrids of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. for egg characters. Univ J Zool Rajshahi Univ. 27:13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Amanlou H. 2005. Genetics of livestock improvement. Zanjan: Zanjan University Press; p. 679.
   Google Scholar
• Ariful H, Rahman SMM, Kamrul Ahsan MD. 2011. Genetic variability, correlation, path analysis and construction of selection index in mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. I. Genetic variability. Univ J Zool Rajshahi Univ. 30:33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ashoka J, Govindan R. 1990. Genetic estimates for quantitative traits in bivoltine silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Mysore J Agric Sci. 24:371–374.
   Google Scholar
• Avendano SJ. Woolliams A, Villanueva B. 2004. Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restrictions on the rate of inbreeding. Gen Res. 83:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizian S, Mirhoseini SZ, Shadparvar A, Ghanipoor M, Seidavi AR. 2011. Inbreeding coefficient and its effect on performance of cocoon traits in four Iranian commercial silkworm lines. J Food Agric Environ. 9:203–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker JSF. 1994. A global protocol for determining genetic distances among domestic livestock breeds. Proceeding of the 5th World congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Guelph, ON: University of Guelph; p. 501–508.
   Google Scholar
• Benchamin KV. 2002. Strategies for improvement of R. Varalakshmi 2002. Effect of multiple mating on silkworm seed quality. Indian Silk. 41:5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bizhannia AR, Seidavi AR, Mirhosseini SZ, Ghanipoor M. 2006. Resistance reaction of three Chinese, Japanese and hybrids groups of silkworm Bombyx mori (Lep.:Bombycidae) against phonotypical selection. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Entomological Societies' Conference; 2006 Sep 24–27; Adelaide (SA): University of Adelaide; p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrashekaraiah M, Babu R. 2003. Constraints, present status and prospects of silkworm breeding. Proceeding of Mulberry Silkworm Breeders Summit; 2003 July 18–19; Hindupur (India): Indian Silk Board Press; p. 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee SN. 1993. Silkworm breeding in India. Seri. 33:427–447.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HR. Jim YY, Huang ZX, Ruan GH, Yao LS. 1994. Breeding of new silkworm variety Fanhura chunmei for spring rearing. Canye Kexue. 20:26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Collard BC, Jahufer Y, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK. 2005. An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker–assisted selection for crop improvement: The basic concepts. Euphytica. 142:169–196.10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristina B, Marghitas LAI, Dezmirean D, Teleky O, Moise A. 2007. Qualitative characters study for silkworm hybrids. Bulletin USAMV-CN. Anim Sci. Biotech. 63:219–223.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham EP. 2003. After BSE-A future for the European livestock sector. EAAP publication no. 108. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Davis G, Denise S. 1998. The impact of genetic markers on selection. J Anim Sci. 76:2331–2339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis G, Galloway S, Ross S, Gregan I, Ward S, Nimbkar J. 2002. DNA test in prolific sheep from eight countries provide new evidence on origin of the booroola (FecB) mutation. Biol Reprod. 66:1869–1874.10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers J. 1999. Breeding values for identified quantitative trait loci under selection. Gen Sci Evol. 31:421–436.10.1186/1297-9686-31-5-421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doreswamy J, Subramanya G. 2012. Inbreeding effects on quantitative traits in random mating and selected populations of the mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Insect Sci. 12:1–9.10.1673/031.012.14001
   Google Scholar
• Doria H, Fujii H, Kawaguchi Y, Kihara H, Banno Y. 1992. Genetic stocks and mutation of Bombyx mori. Fukuoka (Japan): Institute of Genetic Resources, Kyushu University.
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiari M, Gharahveysi S, Seidavi AR. 2011. Genetics, breeding and selection in silkworm. J Food Agric Environ. 9:932–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer DS. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Longman Scientific and Technical; p. 438.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer DS. 1990. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; p. 438.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative traits. 4th ed. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 1998. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans: management of small populations at risk. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Farooq M, Puttaraju HP, Dar HU, Sofi AM. 2002. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence in bivoltine silkworm. Bombyx mori L. Indian J Seri. 41:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Foulley JL, Ollivier L. 2006. Allele diversity. Proceeding 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, CD-ROM Communication; 2006 August 13–18; Belo Horizonte, p. 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gamo T. 1976. Recent concepts and trends in silkworm breeding. Sericologia. 24:394–315.
   Google Scholar
• Gangwar SK. 2012. Seasonal response of two (Silkworm Bombyx mori L.) bivoltine hybrids with comparative performance shoot vs. shelf rearing in Uttar Pradesh climatic conditions. Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci. 8:14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanipoor M, Mirhosseini SZ, Seidavi AR, Shadparvar A, Bizhannia A. 2008. Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in six pure lines of silkworm, Bombyx mori. L. J Agri Sci Guilan Univ. 2:31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanipoor M, Mirhosseini SZ, Shadparvar A, Seidavi AR, Bizhannia A. 2006. Comparison of different selection indices for genetic improvement of economic traits in silkworm (Bombex mori L.) lines. Sericologia. 46:137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanipour M, Mirhosseini SZ, Shadpour A, Seidavi AR, Bijannia A, Sourati R. 2006. A survey of the limitation effect in production an economic value of production and reproduction traits of three commercial silkworms in Iran. Essay collection of the second animal and marine science congress. Proceedings of the 2nd Congress on Animal and Aquatic Science (Volume 1); 2007 May 16–17; Karaj: Iran Research Institute of Animal Science Press; p. 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gharahveysi S, Salehinezhad M, Najafi N, Mirhoseini SZ, Seidavi AR. 2010. In: Oldenbroek K, editor. Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. Qaemshahr: Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard ME. 2001. The validity of genetic models underlying quantitative traits. Livestock Prod Sci. 72:117–127.10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00272-X
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith MR, Shimada T, Abe H. 2005. The genetics and genomics of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Ann Rev Entomol. 50:71–100.10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan RS, Satanahali B, Goad IV, Guraraja MV, Magadam SB. 1991. Graphic analysis of gene action for some larval and cocoon traits in silkworm. Mys Agric Sci. 24:474–481.
   Google Scholar
• Grekov D. 1989. Selection-genetic evaluation of some white cocoon races of the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). Heritability and Genetic correlations of qualitative traits. Zhivotnov'dni Nauki. 26:70–73.
   Google Scholar
• Groen AF. 1989. Cattle breeding goals and production circumstances [ dissertation]. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
   Google Scholar
• Groen AF. 1990. Influences of production circumstances on the economic revenue of cattle breeding programs. Anim Prod. 51:469–480.10.1017/S0003356100012502
   Google Scholar
• Haile-Mariam M, Kassa-Mersh H. 1990. Estimation of direct and maternal covariance component of growth traits in Boran cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 77:43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Harada C. 1961. On the heterosis of quantitative characters in the silkworm. Bull Seric Exp Station. 17:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanabadi A. 2006. Sericulture training manual. Lim SH, Kim YT, Lee SP, Rhee IJ, Lim JS, Lim BH, editors. 2nd ed. Mashhad (Iran): Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publication Iran No. 368, 160 p.
   Google Scholar
• He NJ, Lu C, Li B, Zhou ZY, Xiang ZH. 2001. The construction of linkage map of Bombyx mori by combination of SADF and RAPD. Acta Entomologia Sinica. 44:476–482.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick PW, McDonald JF. 1980. Regulatory gene adaptation in an evolutionary model. Heredity. 45:83–97.10.1038/hdy.1980.52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill WH, Knott S. 1990. Identification of major gene with large effects. In Gianola D, Hammond K. Advances in statistical methods for genetic improvement of livestock. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 447–494.
   Google Scholar
• Hojatpour H, Lavvaf A, Seidavi AR, Farahvash T, Hajian E. Farahvash T. 2012. Effect of individual selection system of parental pure lines on productive traits of six hybrids of silkworm. J Anim Vet Adv. 11:1246–1254.10.3923/javaa.2012.1246.1254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Khan SA, Aslam M. 2010. Evaluation of genetic potential of inbred pure lines of silkworm for breeding and cocoon production in Pakistan. African J Food Sci. 6:300–302.
   Google Scholar
• Iftekher Islam M, Ara Ali I, Haque T. 2005. Combining ability estimation in popular bivoltine mulberry silkworm. Bombyx mori L. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 8:68–72.10.3923/pjbs.2005.68.72
   Google Scholar
• Javanshir K. 1996. Mulberry for silk and silks without mulberry. Tehran (Iran): University of Tehran Press; p. 513. Farsi.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly MS, Datta RK, Noamani MKR, Iyengar MNS, Nagarag CS, Basavaraj HK, Kshamarani G, Rao R. 1989. Studies on the genetic divergence in mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori L. Sericologia. 29:545–559.
   Google Scholar
• Jurado JJ, Alonsoand A, Alenda R. 1994. Selection response for growth in a Spanish Merino flock. Anim Sci. 72:1433–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang PD, Kim KM, Sohn BH, Lee SU, Woo SO, Hong SJ. 2001. Breeding of a new silkworm variety, Chunsujam, with a high yielding for spring rearing season. Int J Indus Entomol. 2:65–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C, Kim K, Park D, Seol Y, Hahn J, Park S, Kang P. 2010. An integrated database for the enhanced identification of silkworm gene resources. Bioinformation. 4:436–437.10.6026/97320630004336
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnaswami SJ, Narasimhanna MN, Suryanarayan SK, Kumararaj S. 1973. Manual of sericulture, silkworm rearing. Rome: F.A.O. United Nation; p. 121.
   Google Scholar
• Kshama G, Kumar SN, Nair S, Datta RK. 1995. Heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlation studies on fitness and quantitative traits of bivoltine silkworm Bombyx mori L. Indian J Seric. 34(1):22–27.10.6026/97320630004336
   Google Scholar
• Kumar NS. 2005. Breeding techniques. In: A text book on silkworm breeding and genetics. Bangalore: Central Silk Board; p. 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Bhutia R, Ahsan MM. 1995. Estimates of genetic variability for commercial quantitative traits and selection indices in bivoltine races of mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. J Indian J Gen Plant Breed. 55:109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar JS, Kumar NS. 2011. Production efficiency of cocoon shell of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (bombycidae: lepidoptera), as an index for evaluating the nutritive value of mulberry, morus sp. (moraceae), varieties. Article ID 807363. New York: Hindawi; 3 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Somasundaram K, Ponnuvel P, Srinivasa Babu KM, Qadri SMH. 2009. Identification of genetic variations among silkworm races of Bombyx mori through bio-molecular tools. Indian J Seri. 48:116–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaresan P, Sinha RK, Rajeurs S. 2007. An analysis of genetic variation and divergence in Indian tropical polyvoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) genotypes. Caspian J Environ Sci. 5:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaresan P, Sinha PK, Rayaradder FR, Thangavelu K. 2003. Selection of parents from multivoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) germplasm through principal component analysis. Indian J Genet. 63:189–190.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaresan P, Sinha RK, Sekar S. 2000. Genetic variability and selection indices for economic quantitative traits of multivoltine mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L. genotypes. Sericologia, 40:595–605.
   Google Scholar
• Li W. 1992. Genetic path network among quantitative characters in Bombyx mori L. Sericologia. 32:143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Li MW, Yao Q, Hou CX, Lin CQ, Chen KP. 2001. Studies of some special characters in the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) germplasm in china. Sericologia. 41:527–535.
   Google Scholar
• Lim SH. 1995. Principles and practices in sericulture. Suwon (South Korea): NSER, RDA; p. 788.
   Google Scholar
• Malik GN, Masoodi MA, Kamili AS. Aijaz M. 1999. Combining ability analysis over environments in diallel crosses of bivoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). Indian J Seri. 38:22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mano Y, Asaoka K, Ihara O, Nakagawa H, Hirabayashi T. 1991. Breeding and evaluation of adaptability of the silkworm Bombyx mori to the new low cost artificial diet, LPY lacking of mulberry leaf powder. Bull Nat Inst Seri Ent. 3:31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Manohar Reddy R, Sinha MK, Hansda G, Vijaya Prakash NB. 2009. Application of parents by selection for basic and commercial seed efficiency in tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury (lepidoptera: saturniidae). Academic J Entom. 2:56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Maqbool A, Malik GN, Dar HU, Afifa S, Kamili S, Zaffar G. 2005. Genetic analysis of 12 quantitative characters in some bivoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) genotypes. Indian J Seri. 44:156–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mavvajpour M, Mirhosseni SZ, Ghanipour M, Seidavi AR. 2008. Effect of different environmental condition on performance of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Plant Protec J. 22:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald JF, Ayala FJ. 1978. Gene regulation in adaptive evolution. Can J Genet Cytol. 20:159–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meuwissen THE. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci. 75:934–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Bizhannia AR, Rabiei B, Taeb M, Seidavi AR, Potki P. 2012. Mapping of the genes controlling cocoon shell percentage trait in silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) using AFLP markers. Modern Gen J. 7:25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Ghanipoor M, Seidavi AR. 2005. Study of genetic trend of biological and quantitative properties of silkworm in successive generations at non-randomized mating populations. Proceeding of 2nd Animal Acience Congress; 2005 September 4–5; University of Guilan Press; p. 111.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Ghanipoor M, Shadparvar A, Etebari K. 2005. Selection indices for cocoon traits in six commercial silkworm (Bombyx mori) lines. Philippine Agric Sci. 88:328–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Nematollahian S, Ghanipoor M, Seidavi AR. 2010. Comparison of phenotypic and genetic performance of local silkworm groups and two commercial lines. Biol Res. 43:411–416.10.4067/S0716-97602010000400005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Seidavi AR. 2008a. In: Doolittle DP, editor. Population genetics basic principles. Second Printing. Rasht (Iran): University of Guilan Press; p. 410.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Seidavi AR. 2008b. Providing comprehensive guide for genetic reserves of silkworm in Iran. Rasht: Silkworm research center, final report of investigation plan; p. 578.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini SZ, Seidavi AR, Ghanipoor M. 2009. The selective species effect as maternal base on quantitative traits function of silkworm crossbreds. Anim Sci Period. 2:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mohapatra HC. 2009. Tropical tasar biodiversity and forestry. National Workshop on Seri-Biodiversity Conservation Proceeding; 2009 March 7–8; CSGRC, Central Silk Board, Hosur, India; p. 163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy SM, Das SK, Rao PRT, Raje Urs S, Sarkar A. 2007. Evaluation and selection of potential parents based on selection indices and isozyme variability in Silkworm, Bombyx mori L, Int J Indust Entomol. 14:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Morohoshi S. 1969. The control of growth and development in Bombyx mori. Relation between environmental moulting and voltine characters. Proc Jap Acad. 45:797–802.
   Google Scholar
• Mu ZM, Liu QX, Liu XL, Li WG, Sun ZY. 1995. Genetic research of vitality and cocoon quality traits of silkworm. J Shan Agr Uni. 26:157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Mubasher H, Shakil AK, Muhammad A. 2010. Evaluation of genetic potential of inbred pure line of silkworm for breeding and cocoon production in Pakistan. African J. Food Sci. 4:300–302.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajan N, Gunasekran M. 2008. Quantitative genetics and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. Delhi (India): Kalyani; p. 285.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraju J. 2002. Application of genetic principles for improving silk production. Curr Sci. 83:409–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraju J, Kumar TP. 1995. Effect of selection on cocoon filament length in divergenty selected lines of the silkworm. Bombyx mori. J Seri Sci Jpn. 64:103–109.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraju JG, Singh L. 1997. Assessment of genetic diversity by DNA profiling and its significance in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Electrophoesis. 18:1676–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nematnezhad B. 1998. Silkworm breeding and its laboratorial important matters. Mashhad (Iran): Publications of Emmam Reza University.; p. 200.
   Google Scholar
• Nematollahian SH, Ghanipoor M, Seidavi AR. 2010. Estimation of genetic parameters and inbreeding effect on economic traits of cocoon in various silkworm lines. Anim Sci Period. 3:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Neshagaran Hemmatabadi R. 2011. Estimation and comparison of response to selection in three commercial lines of Silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) having pupae cocoon [ dissertation]. Qaemshahr: Islamic Azad University.
   Google Scholar
• Neshagaran Hemmatabadi R, Seidavi AR, Gharahveysi S. 2011a. Comparison of response to selection in three peanut cocoon lines of silkworm during spring and autumn seasons. African J Biotech. 10:12348–12357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshagaran Hemmatabadi R, Seidavi AR, Gharahveysi S. 2011b. Estimation of response to selection in three commercial lines of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) having peanut cocoon. J Anim Vet Adv. 10:2208–2214.10.3923/javaa.2011.2208.2214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal NB, Moorthy SM. 2011. Assessment of variability in larval and cocoon traits in some genotypes of bivoltine silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Int J Res Biol Sci. 1:59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Park B, Lee D. 2006. Prediction of Future milk yield with random regression model using test-day records in Holestein cows. J Anim Sci. 19:915–921.
   Google Scholar
• Petkov N, Nacheva Y, Vasileva Y, Petkov Z, Matei M, Ciulu M, Brailou D, Dinita G. 2007a. Evaluation of genetically sex-marked at eggs and larvae stage silkworm Bombyx mori L. hybrids based on silk productivity. Bulgarian J Agric Sci. 13:127–130.
   Google Scholar
• Petkov N, Nguyenvan L. 1987. Breeding genetic studies on some lines of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Genetika-i-Selektsiya. 20:384–354.
   Google Scholar
• Petkov N, Tzenov P, Petkov Z, Vassileva I. 2007b. Mathematical forecasting of selection effect in silkworm Bombyx mori L. on the basis of shell ratio character. International Conference of Sericulture Challenges in the 21st Century (Serichal 2007) and the 3rd BACSA meeting; 2007 September 18–21; Vratza: BACSA (Black, Caspian Seas and Central Asia Silk Press; p. 169–172.
   Google Scholar
• Pirany N, Elyasi Zarringhabaie GH, Taghizadeh A. 2008. Genetic diversity and genetic relationship of 6 Iranian native chicken populations using RAPD markers. Iranian J Anim Sci Res. 19 (1):58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Qeyasi H. 1995. Necessity of banks investment in silkworm rearing and related industries. 1st silk Seminar. Rasht (Iran): Iran Silkworm Rearing Corporation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman SM. 1984. Studies on the genetic improvement of eri silkworm, Philosamia ricini Boisd of Bangladesh [ dissertation]. Rajshahi (Bangladesh): Department of Zoology, Rajshahi University.
   Google Scholar
• Raju PJ, Krishnamurthy NB. 1993. Breeding of two bivoltines, MG 511 and MG 512 of silkworm, Bombyx mori L, for higher viability and silk productivity. Sericologia. 33:577–587.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh B, Chandrashekaraiah M, Lakshmi H, Prasad J. 2001. Silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) genetic stocks-an evolutionary analysis. Bull Ind Aced Seri. 5:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rangaiah S, Govindan R, Devalah MC, Narayanswamy TK. 1995. Genetic studied for some quantitative traits among multivoltine races of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Mysore J Agric Sci. 29:248–251.
   Google Scholar
• Rao PRT. 1997. Genetic architecture and gene action in Bombyx mori L [ dissertation]. Darjeeling: Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal.
   Google Scholar
• Rao CGP, Ramesh C, Chandrashekaraiah M, Ibrahim BK, Seshagiri SV, Nagaraju H. 2004. Evaluation of polyvoltine hybrids based on silk productivity in silkworm, Bombyx mori L Int J Indust Entomol. 9:181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Rao CGP, Seshagi SV, Ramesh C, Ibrahim BK, Nagaraju H, Chandrashekaraiah M. 2006. Evaluation of genetic potential of the polyvoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) germplasm and identification of parents for breeding program. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 7:215–220.10.1631/jzus.2006.B0215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reddy KD, Nagaraju J, Abraham EG. 1999. Genetic characterization of the silkworm Bombyx mori by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored PCR. Genetical Society of Great Britain. Heredity. 83:681–687.10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00607.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza AMS, Rahman SM. 2005. Genetic parameters of some yield and yield contributing traits in silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Univ J Zool Rajshahi Univ. 24:55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Salehinezhad M. 2010b. Categorizing the varieties of silkworm gene bank in Iran based on economic traits [ dissertation]. Ghaemshahr: Islamic Azad University.
   Google Scholar
• Salehinezhad M, Mirhosseni SZ, Gharahveysi S, Mavvajpour M, Seidavi AR. 2010a. Comparative study on the larval development duration of 51 different peanut cocoon strains of Iranian silkworm Bombyx mori L. Gene Bank. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 5:234–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satenahalli SB, Govindan R, Goud GV, Magadum SB. 1990. Genetic parameters and correlation coefficient analysis in silkworm Bombyx mori. Mysore J Agric Sci. 24:491–495.10.3923/ajava.2010.234.245
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR. 2009. Determination and comparison of nutritional indices in commercial silkworm hybrids during various instars. Asian Vet Adv. 4:104–113.10.3923/ajava.2009.104.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR. 2010a. Relationship between season and efficiency of individual selection in six peanut and oval lines of silkworm. IACSIT Int J Eng Tech. 2:211–214.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR. 2010b. Estimation of genetic parameters and selection effect on genetic and phenotype trends in silkworm commercial pure line. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 5:1–12.10.3923/ajava.2010.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR. 2010c. Investigation on effect of individual selection based on cocoon weight on additive genetic value and selection index value in six commercial silkworm pure lines. World J Zool. 5:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR. 2011a. Analysis of combining ability for some parameters in Iranian lines of silkworm Bombyx mori L. (lepidoptera: bombycidae). Ann Biol Res. 2:158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR. 2011b. Evaluation of the genetic potential of six native strains of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Afr J Agric Res. 6:4816–4823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Bizhannia AR. 2008a. Principles and methods of silkworm breeding improvement. Rasht: Haghshenas; p. 150.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Bizhannia A, Ghanipoor M, Qotbi A. 2008b. Investigation on improvement possibility of resistance, production and reproduction traits in 3P, 2P and P generations in three Japanese pure lines of silkworm Bombyx mori L. using individual selection in 3P generation. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 3:443–447.10.3923/ajava.2008.443.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Gholami MR, Biabani MR. 2004a. Evaluation of silkworm Bombyx mori L. breeding from Iran infected by white muscardine disease incidence. Sericologia. 44:231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Gholami MR, Bizhannia AR, Mavvajpoor M. 2004b Evaluation of heterosis, general and special combining ability for some biological characters in six silkworm lines. Biology in Asia International Conference; p. 123–124.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Mirhosseini SZ, Bizhannia AR, Ghanipoor M. 2003. Study of silkworm lines resistance basis to factor of white muscardine disease. Iranian Agric Sci. J. 34:701–710.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Mirhosseini SZ, Bizhannia AR, Ghanipoor M. 2007. Investigation on selection efficiency for some quantitative cocoon characters at 3P lines and its correlation with reproduction and resistance against disease parameters of hybrids (F1) silkworm. Iranian J Biol. 20:262–268.
   Google Scholar
• Seidavi AR, Mirhosseini SZ, Mavajpour M, Ghanipoor M, Bizhannia A, Qotbi A, Chamani M. 2009. Additive Genetic variations and selection Index changes of economic traits of the silkworm commercial pure line against parent selection pressure. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ. 6:460–665.
   Google Scholar
• Sen SK, Das SK, Rao PRT, Ghosh B, Das NK, Chattopadhyay S, Roy GS, Sinha SS. 1995. Studies on some important genetic parameters in silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Indian J Genet. 55:238–242.
   Google Scholar
• Shabdini Pashaki, A. 2010. Genetical parameters estimation of three commercial lines having oval cocoon in Iran [ dissertation]. Qaemshahr: Islamic Azad University.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikhlou M, Shojae J, Pirani N, Alijani S, Rafat A. 2008. Estimation of heritability and repeatability for milk and fat yields in Iranian Holstein cattle using univariate and multivariate models. Iranian J Anim Sci Res. 19:20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sing T, Chandrasekharaiah A, Samson MV. 1998. Correlation and heritability analysis in silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Sericologia. 32:269–273.
   Google Scholar
• Singh BK, Bhattacharya A, Baruah PK, Das PK. 2009. Diversity of eri silkworm and its host plants in north east India: Prospects for their utilization. National Workshop on Seri-Biodiversity Conservation Proceeding; 2008 March 7–8; CSGRC, Central Silk Board, Hosur, India; p. 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Singh T, Chandrashekharaiah A, Samwo MV. 1994. Selection strategies in relation to correlation and heritability in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Bull Seri Res.5:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Singh H, Kumar NS. 2010. On the breeding of bivoltine breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (lepidoptera: bombycidae), tolerant to high temperature and high humidity conditions of the tropics, Article ID 892452. New York: Hindawi; 15 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn KW, Ramires L. 1999. Comparison of the variation in cocoon quality among the single, three-way and double cross hybrids in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Sericologia. 39:15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Soysal MI, Tuna YT, Gurcan EK, Ozkan E. 2004. Sustainable development in the preservation of animal genetic resources in Turkey and in the world. Trak J Sci. 2:47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Strickberger W. 1995. Genetics. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Strrunnikov VA. 1995. Control over reproduction, sex and heterosis of the silkworm. Luxembourg: Har-wood Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Taheri Dezfuli B. 2004. Evaluation and estimation of genetic parameters for producing Holestin cow milk in Khuzestan state. Ahwaz (Iran): Ramin Agriculture College, Shahid Chamran University.
   Google Scholar
• Tahmoorespour M. 2007. Principles of quantitative genetics and related problems. Mashhad (Iran): Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talebi E, Edris MA, Ebadi VR. 2001. Genetic specifications estimation of silkworms several important characters. Agric Tech Sci Nat Res J. 5:199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Talebi E, Khademi M, Subramanya G. 2010. Application of biometrical genetics in mulberry silkworm breeding: a review. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 1:42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Talebi E, Subramanya G. 2009. Genetic distance and heterosis through evaluation index in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Am J Appl Sci. 6:1981–1987.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakolian J. 2000. An approach to native animal and poultry genetics reserves in Iran. Karaj: Animal Science Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tazima P. 1964. The genetics of the silkworm. New York: Logos Press; p. 253.
   Google Scholar
• Thiagarajan V, Bhargava SK, Rameshbabu M, Nagaraj B. 1993. Difference in seasonal performance of 26 strains of silkworm, Bombyx mori (Bombycidae). J Lepidopteran Soc. 47:321–337.
   Google Scholar
• Vaez Jalali E, Seidavi AR, Lavvaf A. 2011a. Determination and comparison of performance and production properties in eight Iranian silkworm hybrids. J Anim Vet Adv. 10:1141–1157.10.3923/javaa.2011.1141.1157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaez Jalali E, Seidavi AR, Lavvaf A. 2011b. Hybrid and hybridization as appropriate tool for silkworm production improvement: a review. J Food Agric Environ. 9: 992–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlock MC. 2002. Selection, load, and inbreeding depression in a large metapopulation. Genetics. 160:1191–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi A. 2001. Future directions of bivoltine silkworm breeding in India. Sericologia. 33:219–222.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi A. 2003. Maintenance of bivoltine silkworm races at breeders level. Proceeding of Mulberry Silkworm Breeders Summit. Hindupur: Indian Silk Board Press; p. 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdi Samadi B, Sayed Tabatabaei BE. 2008. Principles of genetics. 5th ed. Tehran (Iran): University of Tehran Press; p. 368.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshido A, Bando H, Yasukochi Y, Sahar K. 2005. The Bombyx mori karyotype and assignment of linkage groups. Genetics. 170:675–685.10.3923/javaa.2011.1141.1157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanatta DB, Bravo JP, Barbosa JF, Munhoz REF, Fernandez MA. 2009. Evolution of economically important traits from sixteen parental strains of silkworm Bombyx mori L. (lepidoptera: bombycidae). Neotropic Entom. 38:327–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Chen K, He S. 2007. Key principles for breeding spring and autumn using silkworm varieties: from our experience of' breeding 873×874. Caspian J Environ Sci. 5:57–61.
   Google Scholar