Pre-treatment of sugarcane bagasse with a combination of sodium hydroxide and lime for improving the ruminal degradability: optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology

References

• Ahmadi F, Rajaee Rad A, Holtzapple MT, Zamiri MJ. 2013. Short-term oxidative lime pretreatment of palm pruning waste for use as animal feedstuff. J Sci Food Agric. 93:2061–2070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ. 2010. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol. 101:4851–4861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson WF, Dien BS, Jung H-JG, Vogel KP, Weimer PJ. 2010. Effects of forage quality and cell wall constituents of Bermuda grass on biochemical conversion to ethanol. Bioenerg Res. 3:225–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Keshwani D, Chen C. 2007. Potential of agricultural residues and hay for bioethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 142:276–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Stevens MA, Zhu Y, Holmes J, Xu, H. 2013. Understanding of alkaline pretreatment parameters for corn stover enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Biofuel. 6:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepak V, Kalishwaralal K, Ramkumarpandian S, Babu SV, Senthilkumar SR, Sangiliyandi G. 2008. Optimization of media composition for Nattokinase production by Bacillus subtilis using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol. 99:8170−8174.
   Google Scholar
• Ding S-Y, Liu Y-S, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Baker JO, Bayer EA. 2012. How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility? Science. 338:1055–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falls MD. 2011. Development of oxidative lime pretreatment and shock treatment to produce highly digestible lignocellulose for biofuel and ruminant feed applications [PhD Dissertation]. College Station (TX): Texas A& M University; p. 270.
   Google Scholar
• Fedorak PM, Hrudey SE. 1983. A simple apparatus for measuring gas production by methanogenic cultures in serum bottles. Environ Technol. 4:425–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandi J, Holtzapple MT, Ferrer A, Byers FM, Turner ND, Nagwani M, Chang S. 1997. Lime treatment of agricultural residues to improve rumen digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 68:195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi E, Ghorbani GR, Khorvash M, Emami MR. 2014. Adjustment of pH and enzymatic treatment of barley straw by dry processing method. J Appl Anim Res 42:400–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi E, Khorvash M, Ghorbani GR, Elmamouz F. 2014. Effects of straw treatment and nitrogen supplementation on digestibility, intake and physiological responses of water intake as well as urine and faecal characteristics. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 98:100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressley TF, Hall MB, Armentano LE. 2011. Ruminant nutrition symposium: productivity, digestion, and health responses to hindgut acidosis in ruminants. J Anim Sci. 89:1120–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Lee Y. 2010. Investigation of biomass degradation mechanism in pretreatment of switchgrass by aqueous ammonia and sodium hydroxide. Bioresour Technol. 101:8185–8191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad S, Grant R, Kachman S. 1998. Effect of wheat straw treated with alkali on ruminal function and lactational performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 81:1956–1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrichs J, Kononoff P. 1996. Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Penn State Particle Size Separator. Pennsylvania State University. Available from: http://extension.psu.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks A, Zeeman G. 2009. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 100:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervás G, Frutos P, Giráldez FJ, Mora MJ, Fernández B, Mantecón AR. 2005. Effect of preservation on fermentative activity of rumen fluid inoculum for in vitro gas production techniques. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 123–124:107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim T-W, Chokhawala H, Schroth G, Luo S, Clark DS, Chen F, Zhang T. 2011. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science. 331:463–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MB, Brunton NP, Patras A, Tiwari B, O’Donnell C, Martin-Diana AB, Barry-Ryan C. 2012. Optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of antioxidant compounds from marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) using response surface methodology. Ultrason Sonochem. 19:582–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunanithy C, Muthukumarappan K. 2011. Optimization of alkali soaking and extrusion pretreatment of prairie cord grass for maximum sugar recovery by enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J. 54:71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Holtzapple MT. 2005. Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol. 96:1994–2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Holtzapple MT. 2006. Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresour Technol. 97:583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH. 2004. Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover [ PhD Dissertation]. College Station (TX): Texas A& M University.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Murthy GS. 2011. Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuel. 4:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai YZ. 1991. Chemical degradation. In: Hon DN-S, Shiraishi N, editors. Wood and cellulose chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker; p. 455–473.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D-S, Wi SG, Lee SJ, Lee Y-G, Kim Y-S, Bae H-J. 2014. Rapid saccharification for production of cellulosic biofuels. Bioresour Technol. 158:239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 66:506–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellenberger RW, Satter L, Millett M, Baker A. 1970. An in vitro technique for estimating digestibility of treated and untreated wood. J Anim Sci. 30:1005–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 23:103–116.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 1984. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 6th rev ed. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okano K, Fukui S, Kitao R, Usagawa T. 2007. Effects of culture length of Pleurotus eryngii grown on sugarcane bagasse on in vitro digestibility and chemical composition. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 136:240–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ørskov E, McDonald I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agri Sci. 92:499–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan X, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN. 2004. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded Douglas fir wood by alkali-oxygen post-treatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 115:1103–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Peng F, Bian J, Ren J-L, Peng P, Xu F, Sun R-C. 2012. Fractionation and characterization of alkali-extracted hemicelluloses from peashrub. Biomass Bioenerg. 39:20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaee Rad A, Ahmadi F, Mohammadabadi T, Ziaee E, Polikarpov I. 2014. Combination of sodium hydroxide and lime as a pretreatment for conversion of date palm leaves into a promising ruminant feed: an optimization approach. Waste Biomass Valor. 6:243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Ramli M, Imura Y, Takayama K, Nakanishi Y. 2005. Bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse with Japanese Koji by solid-state fermentation and its effects on nutritive value and preference in goats. Asian Aust J Anim Sci. 18:1279–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat R, Kumbhar B, Tewari L. 2013. Optimization of alkali pretreatment for bioconversion of poplar (Populus deltoides) biomass into fermentable sugars using response surface methodology. Ind Crops Prod. 44:220–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezende CA, de Lima MA, Maziero P, Ribeiro deAzevedo E, Garcia W, Polikarpov I. 2011. Chemical and morphological characterization of sugarcane bagasse submitted to a delignification process for enhanced enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuel. 4:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson P, Getachew G. 2002. A practical gas production technique to determine the nutritive value of forages: the UC Davis approach. UC, Davis Cooperative Extension.
   Google Scholar
• Samariha A, Khakifirooz A. 2011. Application of NSSC pulping to sugarcane bagasse. BioResources. 6:3313−3323.
   Google Scholar
• Shiroma R, Park J-Y, Al-Haq MI, Arakane M, Ike M, Tokuyasu K. 2011. RT-CaCCO process: an improved CaCCO process for rice straw by its incorporation with a step of lime pretreatment at room temperature. Bioresour Technol. 102:2943–2949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J. 2007 A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresour Technol. 98:3000–3011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Lin L, Deng H, Li J, He B, Sun R, Ouyang P. 2008. Structural changes of bamboo cellulose in formic acid. BioResources. 3:297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao L, Aden A, Elander RT, Pallapolu VR, Lee Y, Garlock RJ, Balan V, Dale BE, Kim Y, Mosier NS, et al. 2011. Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass. Bioresour Technol. 102:11105–11114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson J, Lewis B. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K. 2012. Ultrasound-assisted alkaline pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for fermentable sugar production: optimization through response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol. 112:293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waghorn GC, McNabb WC. 2003. Consequences of plant phenolic compounds for productivity and health of ruminants. Proc Nutr Soc. 62:383–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace J. 2000 Increasing agricultural water use efficiency to meet future food production. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 82:105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer P, Dien B, Springer T, Vogel K. 2005. In vitro gas production as a surrogate measure of the fermentability of cellulosic biomass to ethanol. Appl Microb Biotechnol. 67:52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Arakane M, Ike M, Wada M, Takai T, Gau M, Tokuyasu K. 2011. Low temperature alkali pretreatment for improving enzymatic digestibility of sweet sorghum bagasse for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 102:4793–4799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Cheng JJ. 2011. Pretreatment of switchgrass for sugar production with the combination of sodium hydroxide and lime. Bioresour Technol. 102:3861–3868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Wang Q, Jiang ZH, Yang X, Ji Y. 2007. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw. Biomass Bioenerg. 31:162–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar