Rumen degradation and nutritive utilization of wheat straw, corn stalks and sugarcane bagasse ensiled with multienzymes

References

• Alsersy H, Salem AZM, Borhami BE, Olivares J, Gado HM, Mariezcurrena MD, Yacuot MH, Kholif AE, El-Adawy M, Hernandez SR. 2015. Effect of Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus) ensilaging with two developed enzyme cocktails on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation in sheep. Anim Sci J. 86:51–58. doi: 10.1111/asj.12247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1997. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola KG, Adesogan AT. 2013. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme application on the digestibility of corn silage, alfalfa hay, two concentrates, and complete diets under simulated ruminal and preruminal conditions. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 13:537–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Colombatto D, Morgavi DP. 2004. A rationale for the development of feed enzyme products for ruminants. Can J Anim Sci. 84:23–36. doi: 10.4141/A02-103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat MK, Hazlewood GP. 2001. Enzymology and other characteristics of cellulases and xylanases. In: Bedford MR, Partridge GG, editors. Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; p. 11–60.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Mao HL, Wang JK, Wu CH, Liu JX. 2013. Exogenous fibrolytic enzymes: effects on in vitro fermentation and methane production of corn silage. Chin J Anim Nutr. 25:214–221.
   Google Scholar
• Chesson A. 1984. Microbiology of the rumen in relation to the chemical or biological treatment of crops and by-products. In Proceeding Second Seminar on the Upgrading of Crops and Byproducts: Improvements in the Nutritive Value of Crops and By-products by Chemical or Biological Treatments. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UK. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chung YH, Zhou M, Holtshausen L, Alexander TW, McAllister TA, Guan LL, Oba M, Beauchemin KA. 2012. A fibrolytic enzyme additive for lactating Holstein cow diets: ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, and enteric methane emissions. J Dairy Sci. 95:1419–1427. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean DB, Valencia E, Krueger NA, Adesogan AT. 2013. Effect of treatment with fibrolytic enzymes or ammonia on the nutritive value of guineagrass (Panicum maximum) hay. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 13:517–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz A, Carro MD, Saro C, Mateos I, Odongo E, Ranilla MJ. 2013. In vitro evaluation of commercial fibrolytic enzymes for improving the nutritive value of low-quality forages. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 13:461–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun JS, Beauchemin KA. 2007. Enhancing in vitro degradation of alfalfa hay and corn silage using feed enzymes. J Dairy Sci. 90:2839–2851. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facchini FDA, Vici AC, Benassi VM, Freitas LAP, Reis RA, Jorge JA, Terenzi HF, Polizeli MLTM. 2011. Optimization of fibrolytic enzyme production by Aspergillus japonicus C03 with potential application in ruminant feed and their effects on tropical forages hydrolysis. Bioproc Biosyst Eng. 34:1027–1038. doi: 10.1007/s00449-011-0553-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng P, Hunt CW, Pritchard GT, Julien WE. 1996. Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers. J Anim Sci. 74:1349–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes CMGA, Hall J, Hirst BH, Hazlewood GP, Gilbert HJ. 1995. The resistance of cellulases and xylanases to proteolytic inactivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 43: 52–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00170622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gado HM, Salem AZM, Camacho LM, Elghandour MMY, Salazar MC. 2013. Influence of exogenous enzymes of ZAD® on in vitro ruminal degradation of ensiled rice straw with DDGS. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 13:569–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gado HM, Salem AZM, Odongo NE, Borhami BE. 2011. Influence of exogenous enzymes ensiled with orange pulp on digestion and growth performance in lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 165:131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gado HM, Salem AZM, Robinson PH, Hassan M. 2009. Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 154:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani EGGR, Khorvash M, Emami MR. 2014. Adjustment of pH and enzymatic treatment of barley straw by dry processing method. J Appl Anim Res. 42:400–405. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2013.875908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo LA, Tejido ML, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD. 2008. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on in vitro ruminal fermentation of substrates with different forage:concentrate ratios. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 141:306–325. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering MK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook, no. 379. Washington (DC): Agricultural Research Services, USDA.
   Google Scholar
• Khattab HM, Gado HM, Kholif AE, Mansour AM, Kholif AM. 2011. The potential of feeding goats sun dried rumen contents with or without bacterial inoculums as replacement for berseem clover and the effects on milk production and animal health. Int J Dairy Sci. 6:267–277. doi: 10.3923/ijds.2011.267.277
   Google Scholar
• Khattab HM, Gado HM, Salem AZM, Camacho LM, El-Sayed MM, Kholif AM, ElShewy AA, Kholif AE. 2013. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of Pleurotus ostreatus spent rice straw. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 13:507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholif AE, Khattab HM, El-Shewy AA, Salem AZM, Kholif AM, El-Sayed MM, Gado HM, Mariezcurrena MD. 2014. Nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation activities, serum parameters and milk production and composition of lactating goats fed diets containing rice straw treated with Pleurotus ostreatus. Asian Austral J Anim Sci. 27:357–364. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, McSweeney CS. 2003. Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 27:663–693. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00072-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger NA, Adesogan AT. 2008. Effects of different mixtures of fibrolytic enzymes on digestion and fermentation of bahiagrass hay. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 145:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of sheep. 6th Revised ed. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salem AZM, Gado HM, Colombatto D, Elghandour MMY. 2013. Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and growth performance in beef steers. Livest Sci. 154:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 1999. User’s guide: statistics. Version 8. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Susmel P, Spanghero M, Stefanon B. 1999. Interpretation of rumen degradability of concentrate feeds with a Gompertz model. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 79:223–237. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00016-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton JD, Phipps RH, Deaville ER, Jones AK, Humphries DJ. 2002. Whole-crop wheat for dairy cows: effects of crop maturity, a silage inoculant and enzyme added before feeding on food intake and digestibility and milk production. Anim Sci. 74:307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Tang SX, Zou Y, Wang M, Salem AZM, Odongo NE, Zhou CS, Han XF, Tan ZL, Zhang M, Fu YF, et al. 2013. Effects of exogenous cellulase source on in vitro fermentation characteristics and methane production of crop straws and grasses. Anim Nutr Feed Technol. 13:489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley JM, Terry RA. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro degradation of forage crops. J Br Grass Soc. 18:104–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
   Google Scholar
• Togtokhbayar N, Cerrillo SMA, Jigjidpurev S, Shinekhuu J, Urantulkhuur D, Nergui D, Elghandour MMY, Odongo NE, Kholif AE. 2015. Effect of exogenous xylanase on rumen in vitro gas production and degradability of wheat straw. Anim. Sci. J. 86:765–771. doi: 10.1111/asj.12364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes KI, Salem AZM, Lopez S, Alonso MU, Rivero N, Elghandour MMY, Domínguez IA, Ronquillo MG, Kholif AE. 2015. Influence of exogenous enzymes in presence of Salix babylonica extract on digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and performance of lambs fed maize silage. J Agr Sci. 153:732–742. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614000975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, McAllister TA, Rode LM, Beauchemin KA, Morgavi DP, Nsereko VL, Iwaasa AD, Yang W. 2002. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on epiphytic microbial populations and in vitro silage digestion. J Sci Food Agric. 82:760–768. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar