Effect of egg yolk concentration and washing on sperm quality following cryopreservation in Barbari buck semen

References

• Bailey JL, Bilodeau JF, Cormier N. 2000. Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J Androl. 21:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bencharif D, Amirat L, Anton M, Schmitt E, Desherces S, Delhomme G, Langlois ML, Barriere P, Larrat M, Tainturier D. 2008. The advantages of LDL (low density lipoproteins) in the cryopreservation of canine semen. Theriogenology. 70:1478–1488. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron A, Manjunath P. 2006. New insights towards understanding the mechanisms of sperm protection by egg yolk and milk. Mol Reprod Dev. 73:1338–1344. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bispo CAS, Pugliesi G, Galvao P, Rodrigues MT, Ker PG, Filgueiras B, Carvalho GR. 2011. Effect of low and high egg yolk concentrations in the semen extender for goat semen cryopreservation. Small Ruminant Res. 100:54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin S, Sirard M, Dufour M, Bailey J. 2000. Sperm calcium levels and chlortetracycline fluorescence patterns are related to the in vivo fertility of cryopreserved bovine semen. J Androl. 21:938–943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cormier N, Bailey JL. 2003. A differential mechanism is involved during heparin and cryopreservation induced capacitation of bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 69:177–185. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darin-bennett A, Poulos A, White IG. 1973. The effect of cold shock and freeze-thawing on release of phosphiolipids by ram, bull, and boar spermatozoa. Aust J Biol Sci. 26:1409–1420. doi: 10.1071/BI9731409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Leeuw FE, Chen HC, Colenbrander B, Verkleij AJ. 1990. Cold-induced ultra structural changes in bull and boar sperm plasma membranes. Cryobiology. 27:171–183. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(90)90009-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai NR, Mahfouz R, Sharma R, Gupta S, Agarwal A. 2010. Reactive oxygen species levels are independent of sperm concentration, motility, and abstinence in a normal, healthy, proven fertile man: a longitudinal study. Fertil Steril. 94:1541–1543. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drobnis EZ, Crowe LM, Berger T, Anchordoguy TJ, Overstreet W, Crowe JH. 1993. Cold shock damage is due to lipid phase transitions in cell membranes, a demonstration using sperm as a model. J Exp Zoo. 265:432–437. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402650413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreiral VS, Mello MRB, da Fonseca CEM, Dias ACF, Cardoso JM, Silva RB, Martins WP. 2014. Effect of seminal plasma and egg yolk concentration on freezability of goat semen. R Bras Zootec. 43:513–518. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982014001000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forouzanfar M, Sharafi M, Hosseini SM, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Hosseini L, Abedi P, Nili N, Rahmani HR, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2010. In vitro comparison of egg yolk-based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of ram semen. Theriogenology. 73:480–487. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafez B, Hafez ESE. 2000. Reproduction in farm animals. 7th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Hagiwara M, Choi JH, Devireddy RV, Roberts KP, Wolkers WF, Makhlouf A, Bischof JC. 2009. Cellular biophysics during freezing of rat and mouse sperm predicts post-thaw motility. Biol Reprod. 81:700–706. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.076075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerstedt RH, Graham JK, Nolan JP. 1990. Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J Androl. 11:73–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hancock JL. 1952. The morphology of bull spermatozoa. J Exp Biol. 29:445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RAP, White IG. 1972. Glycolytic enzymes in the spermatozoa and cytopalsmic droplets of bull, boar and ram, and their leakage after cold shock. J Reprod Fertil. 30:105–115. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0300105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Januskauskas A, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2003. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology. 60:743–758. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RC, Martin ICA. 1973. The effects of dilution, egg yolk and cooling to 5–8°c in the ultrastructure of ram spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 35:311–320. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0350311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kadirvel G, Kathiravan P, Kumar S. 2011. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation and zona binding ability of in vitro capacitated and cryopreserved buffalo spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 75:1630–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanz RN, Pickett BW, Komarek RJ. 1965. Effect of lipid additives on pre and post-freeze survival of bovine spermatozoa. J Dairy Sci. 48:1692–1697. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(65)88553-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leboeuf B, Restall B, Salomon S. 2000. Production and storage of goat semen for artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci. 62:113–141. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00156-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay G, Evans G, Maxwell WMC. 2005. Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology. 63:445–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon MA, Bretzlaff KN, Ott RS. 1986. Comparison of semen collection techniques in goats. Theriogenology. 26:823–827. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(86)90011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moce E, Blanch E, Tomas C, Graham JK. 2010. Use of cholesterol in sperm cryopreservation: present moment and future prospects. Reprod Domestic Anim. 45:57–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01635.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa M, Martinet V, Trimeche A, Tainturier D, Anton M. 2002. Low density lipoproteins extracted from hen egg yolk by an easy method: cryoprotective effect on frozen–thawed bull semen. Theriogenology. 57:1695–1706. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00682-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller K, Muller P, Pincemy G, Kurz A, Labbe C. 2008. Characterization of sperm plasma membrane properties after cholesterol modification: consequences for cryopreservation of rainbow trout spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 78:390–399. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naing SW, Haron AW, Goriman MAK, Yusoff R, Bakar MZA, Sarsaifi K, Bukar MM, Thein M, Kyaw T, San MM. 2011. Effect of Seminal Plasma Removal, Washing Solutions, and Centrifugation Regimes on Boer Goat Semen Cryopreservation. Pertanika J Trop Agri Sci. 34:271–279.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi A, Zhandi M, Towhidi A, Sharafi M, Sharif AA, Motlagh MK, Martinez-Pastor F. 2013. Trehalose and glycerol have a dose-dependent synergistic effect on the post-thawing quality of ram semen cryopreserved in a soybean lecithin-based extender. Cryobiology. 66:275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenhof H, Friedel K, Sieme H, Glasmacher B, Wolkers WF. 2010. Membrane permeability parameters for freezing of stallion sperm as determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Cryobiology. 61:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2010.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortman K, Rodriguez, MH. 1994. Membrane damage during dilution, cooling and freezing-thawing of boar spermatozoa packaged in plastic bags. Vet Med A-Zbl Vet A – Physiol. 41:37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicer-Rubio MT, Combarnous Y. 1998. Deterioration of goat spermatozoa in skimmed milk-based extenders as a result of oleic acid released by the bulbourethral lipase BUSgp60. J Reprod Fertil. 112:95–105. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1120095
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdy PH. 2006. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Ruminant Res. 63:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn PJ, White IG. 1968. The effect of pH, cations and protective agents on the susceptibility of ram spermatozoa to cold shock. Exp Cell Res. 49:31–39. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90516-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan R, Goel, AK, Ramachandean N, Kharche SD, Jindal SK. 2015. Effect of egg yolk and equilibration period on freezability of jamunapari buck semen. Ind J Small Ruminant Res. 21:32–36. doi: 10.5958/0973-9718.2015.00027.6
   Google Scholar
• Roca J, Carrizosa JA, Campos I, Lafuente A, Vazquez JM, Martinez E. 1997. Viability and fertility of unwashed Murciano-Granadina goat spermatozoa diluted in Tris-egg yolk extender and stored at 5 °C. Small Ruminant Res. 25:147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava N, Jerome A, Srivastava SK, Ghosh SK, Amit K. 2013. Bovine seminal PDC–109 protein: a review of biochemical and functional properties. Anim Reprod Sci. 138:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar DJ. 2014. Morphological and functional characterization of in vitro capacitated and frozen thawed Swamp buffalo spermatozoa [Ph.D. thesis]. Guwahati, India: Assam Agricultural University.
   Google Scholar
• Talukdar DJ, Ahmed K, Deka BC, Sinha S, Deori S, Das GC. 2016. Cryo-capacitation changes during cryopreservation of swamp buffalo spermatozoa. Ind J Anim Sci. 86(4):397–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar DJ, Ahmed K, Talukdar P. 2015. Cryocapacitation and fertility of cryopreserved semen. Int J Livestock Res. 5:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Upreti GC, Hall EL, Koppens D, Oliver JE, Vishwanath R. 1999. Studies on the measurement of phospholipaseA2 (PL A2) and PL A2 inhibitor activities in ram semen. Anim Repord Sci. 56:107–121. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00033-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson PF. 1975. Use of Geimsa stain to detect changes in acrosomes of frozen ram spermatozoa. Vet Res. 97:12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Watson PF. 1995. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev. 7:871–891. doi: 10.1071/RD9950871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar