1,321
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Long-term effects of electrochemically activated drinking water on milk yield, milk composition and somatic cell counts in dairy cows: a field study

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 304-308 | Received 21 Jan 2021, Accepted 24 Jun 2021, Published online: 11 Jul 2021

References

  • Boland F, O'Grady L, More SJ. 2013. Investigating a dilution effect between somatic cell count and milk yield and estimating milk production losses in Irish dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 96(3):1477–1484.
  • Capuco AV, Rice CP, Baldwin RL, Bannerman DD, Paape MJ, Hare WR, Kauf AC, McCarty W, Hapeman GW, Sadeghi CJ, et al. 2005. Fate of dietary perchlorate in lactating dairy cows: relevance to animal health and levels in the milk supply. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(45):16152–16157. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508337102.
  • Carlson MP. 2018. Chapter 80 – water quality and contaminants, editor(s): Ramesh C. Gupta, veterinary toxicology. 3rd ed. Academic Press. p. 1099–1115. ISBN 9780128114100, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811410-0.00080-5
  • Copeland A, Lytle DA. 2014. Measuring the oxidation-reduction potential of important oxidants in drinking water. J Am Water Work Assoc. 106(1):E10–E20. doi:10.5942/jawwa.2014.106.0002.
  • EFSA. 2015. Panel on contaminants in the food chain (CONTAM). Risks for public health related to the presence of chlorate in food. EFSA J. 13:4135. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4135.
  • Gray MJ, Wholey WY, Jakob U. 2013. Bacterial responses to reactive chlorine species. Annu Rev Microbiol. 67:141–160.
  • Hagnestam-Nielsen C, Emanuelson U, Berglund B, Strandberg E. 2009. Relationship between somatic cell count and milk yield in different stages of lactation. J Dairy Sci. 92(7):3124–3133. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1719.
  • Koide S, Shitanda D, Note M, Cao W. 2011. Effects of mildly heated, slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the disinfection and physicochemical properties of sliced carrot. Food Control. 22(3–4):452–456.
  • Lundqvist J, Andersson A, Johannisson A, Lavonen E, Mandava G, Kylin H, Bastviken D, Oskarsson A. 2019. Innovative drinking water treatment techniques reduce the disinfection-induced oxidative stress and genotoxic activity. Water Res. 155:182–192. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.052.
  • McParland S, Dillon PG, Flynn J, Ryan N, Arkins S, Kennedy A. 2019. Effect of using internal teat sealant with or without antibiotic therapy at dry-off on subsequent somatic cell count and milk production. J Dairy Sci. 102(5):4464–4475. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15195.
  • NRC. 2001. Water requirements in nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Qi H, Huang QG, Hung YC. 2018. Effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing water treatment in removing pesticide residues and its effect on produce quality. Food Chem. 239:561–568. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.144.
  • Vargas-Bello-Perez E, Dhakal R, Nielsen MO, Ahrne L, Hansen HH. 2020a. Short communication: effects of electrochemically activated drinking water on bovine milk production and composition, including chlorate, perchlorate, and fatty acid profile. J Dairy Sci. 103(2):1208–1214. doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17510.
  • Vargas-Bello-Perez E, Dhakal R, Nielsen MO, Ahrne L, Hansen HH. 2020b. Corrigendum to: “Short communication: electrochemical activated drinking water effects on bovine milk production and composition, including chlorate, perchlorate, and fatty acid profile”. J Dairy Sci 103:1208–1214; 4892–4893. doi:10.3168/jds.2020-103-5-4892
  • Volden H. 2011. Norfor—the nordic feed evaluation system. EAAP scientific series. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.