Assessment of nutritive value, gas and methane production, fermentation of ensiled mixtures of sorghum–cluster bean

References

• Açıkgöz E, Turgut İ, Filya İ. 2002. Silaj Bitkileri Yetiştirme ve Silaj Yapımı. Hasat Yayıncılık, Bursa.
   Google Scholar
• Aderinola OA, Lateef OA, Binuomote RT, Adeeyo A, Jekayinfa OA. 2014. Nutritional and microbial contents of varied combination of ensiled Panicum maximum and Vetiveria nigritana grass. Int J Food Agric Vet Sci. 4(1):141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Aman P. 1993. Composition and structure of cell wall polysaccharides in forages. In: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfeld RD, Ralph J, editors. Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. Madison (WI): ASA, CSSA and SSSA; p. 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official method of analysis. 15th ed. Washington (DC, USA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists; p. 66–88.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan M, Cakmakci S. 2011. Comparison of corn (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) silages mixed with different plants. Akdeniz Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi. 24:47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Barry TN. 1989. Condensed tannins; their role in ruminant protein and carbohydrate digestion and possible effects upon the rumen ecosystem. In: Nolan JV, Leng RA, Demeyer DIThe roles of protozoa and fungi in ruminant digestion. Armidale (Australia): Penambul Books; p. 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Blummel M, Orskov ER. 1993. Comparison of € in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 40:109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz T, Kamalak A. 2020. Determination of potential nutritive values and anti-methanogenic characteristics of salix babylonica leaves grown in different sites. KSU J. Agric Nat. 23(5):1351–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras-Govea F, Marsalis M, Angadi S, Smith G, Lauriault LM, VanLeeuwen D. 2011. Fermentability and nutritive value of corn and forage sorghum silage when in mixture with lablab bean. Crop Sci. 51(3):1307–1313. doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curek M, Ozen N. 2004. Feed value of cactus and cactus silage. Turk J Veterinary Anim Sci. 28(4):633–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boever JL, Cottyn BG, De Brabander DL, Vanacker JM, Boucqué CV. 1997. Prediction of the feeding value of maize silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and NIRS. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 66:211–222. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01101-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira SG, Berchielli TT, dos Santos Pedreira M, Primavesi O, Frighetto R, Lima MA. 2007. Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 135(3-4):236–248. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois M, Giles KA, Hamilton JK, Roberts DA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 28:350–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getachew G, Robinson PH, Depeters EJ, Taylor S, Gisi DD, Higginbotham GE, Riordan TJ. 2005. Methane production from commercial dairy rations estimated using an in vitro gas technique. Feed Sci Technol. 123-124:391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel G, Makkar HP, Becker K. 2008. Effects of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extracts on partitioning of nutrients from roughage-and concentrate-based feeds to methane. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 147(1-3):72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart SP. 1990. Effects of altering the grain content of sorghum silage on ıts nutritive value. J Anim Sci. 68:3832–3842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal A, Akbar N, Khan HZ, Abbas RN, Ahmad J. 2012. Productivity of summer legume forages intercropped with maize as affected by mixed cropping in different sowing techniques. J Anim Plant Sci. 22(3):758–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanzad E, Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, Keshavarz Afshar R, Hosseini MB, Barker AV. 2016. Silage fermentation profile, chemical composition and economic evaluation of millet and soya bean grown in monocultures and as intercrops. Grass Forage Sci. 71(4):584–594. doi:10.1111/gfs.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Atalay AI, Kaplan M. 2010. Determination of potential nutritive value of young, old and senescent leaves of Arbutus andrachne tree. J Appl Animal Res. 37(2):257–260. doi:10.1080/09712119.2010.9707136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan M. 2011. Effect of ensiling of alfalfa with sorghum on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage mixtures. J Anim Veterinary Adv. 10(18):2368–2371.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Akar T, Kamalak A, Bulut S. 2014. Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turk J Agric For. 38:838–846. doi:10.3906/tar-1401-20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Kale H, Kardes YM, Karaman K, Kahraman K, Yılmaz MF, Temizgul R, Akar T. 2020. Characterization of local Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) population grains in terms of nutritional properties and evaluation by GT biplot approach. Starch-Stärke. 72(3–4):1900232. doi:10.1002/star.201900232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Kara K, Unlukara A, Kale H, Buyukkilic Beyzi S, Varol IS, Kizilsimsek M, Kamalak A. 2019. Water deficit and nitrogen affects yield and feed value of sorghum sudangrass silage. Agric Water Manage. 218:30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilsimsek M, Ozturk C, Yanar K, Ertekin I, Ozkan CO, Kamalak A. 2017. Associative effects of ensiling soybean and corn plant as mixtures on the nutritive value, fermentation and methane emission. Feb-Fresenius Environ Bull. 26:5754–5760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo M, Hirano Y, Ikai N, Kita K, Jayanegara A, Yokota HO. 2014. Assessment of anti-nutritive activity of tannins in tea by-products based on in vitro rumen fermentation. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 27(11):1571–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusvuran A, Uysal Can U, Baga M. 2019. Forage yield and quality of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) harvested at different growing stages. Turkish J Nat Sci. 8(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhang H, Zhou X, Guan Y, Yao F, Song G, Wang J, Zhang C. 2010. Genetic diversity in Chinese sorghum landraces revealed by chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 57:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima R, Díaz RF, Castro A, Fievez V. 2011. Digestibility, methane production and nitrogen balance in sheep fed ensiled or fresh mixtures of sorghum–soybean forage. Livest Sci. 141(1):36–46. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima-Orozco R, Van Daele I, Alvarez-Hernandez U, Fievez V. 2014. Combined conservation of jack bean and velvet bean with sorghum: evaluation of lab-scale silages and in vitro assessment of their nutritive value. J Agric Sci. 152(6):967–980. doi:10.1017/S0021859614000148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin B, Wang JH, Lu Y, Liang Q, Liu JX. 2013. In vitro rumen fermentation and methane production are influenced by active components of essential oils combined with fumarate. Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 97(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01236.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López S, Makkar HPS, Soliva CR. 2010. Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In: Vercoe PE, Makkar HPS, Schlink A, editors. In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies. London (New York, USA): Springer Netherlands; p. 191–231.
   Google Scholar
• Makkar HPS. 2003. Effect and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Rumin Res. 49:241–256. doi:10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar HPS, Blummel M, Becker K. 1995. Formation of complexes between polyvinylpolypyrrolidone or polyethylene glycols and tannins and their implication in gas production and true digestibility in uitro techniques. Brit J Nutr. 73:897–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow (UK): Chalcombe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritzi D, Schneider W. 1979. The estimation of digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they incubated with rumen liquor in uitro. J Agric Sci. (Camb). 92:217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Devlop. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE, Dickerson JT. 1988. Storage temperature effects on proteolysis in alfalfa silage. Trans ASAE. 31:1005–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE, Moser LE, Pitt RE. 2003. Postharvest factors affecting ensiling. In: Buxton D.R., Muck R.E., Harrison J.H, editor. Silage science and technology. Agron. monogr. 42. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA; p. 251–304.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad LR, Baba M, Mustapha A, Ahmad MY, Abdurrahman LS. 2008. Use of legumes in the improvement of silage quality of Columbus grass (Sorghum almum Parodi). Res J Anim Sci. 2(4):109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ni K, Zhao J, Zhu B, Su R, Pan Y, Ma J, Zhou G, Tao Y, Liu X, Zhong J. 2018. Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum. Bioresour Technol. 265:563–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oflaz M, Kilic U, Yavrucu O. 2019. Determining potential feed value and silage quality of guar bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) silages. Open Life Sci. 14(1):342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfaz M, Kilic U, Yavrucu O. 2019. Determining potential feed value and silage quality of guar bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) silages. Open Life Sci. 14(1):342–348. doi:10.1515/biol-2019-0038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk D, Kizilsimsek M, Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Ozkan C. 2006. Effects of ensiling alfalfa with whole-crop maize on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage mixtures. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 19(4):526–532. doi:10.5713/ajas.2006.526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra CS, Bolson DC, Jacovaci FA, Nussio LG, Jobim CC, Daniel JLP. 2019. Influence of soybean-crop proportion on the conservation of maize-soybean bi-crop silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 257:114295. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podkówka Z, Podkówka L. 2011. Chemical composition and quality of sweet sorghum and maize silages. J Central Eur Agric. 12(2):294–303.
   Google Scholar
• Prostko EP, Muir JP, Stokes SR.. 1998. The influence of harvest timing on forage sorghum silage yield and quality. Stephensville (TX): Texas Agric. Exp. Stn.; p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rai DK. 2015. Trends and economic dynamics of guar in India, Working Paper, 311.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez AC, Subudhi PK, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT. 2002. Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Plant Mol Biol. 48:713–726. doi:10.1023/A:1014894130270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 1999. SAS user’s guide. Statistic. Cary (NC): Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Scalbert A. 1991. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry. 30:3875–3883. doi:10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkel H. 1998. Methods for determination of energetic feed value scientific base and practical experience. Arch Anim Nutr. 51:155–165. doi:10.1080/17450399809381915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh Santosh K. An analysis of guar crop in India, GAIN Report Number: IN4035, USDA Foreign Agricultural Services, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Suliman AIA, Daghash HA, Abd-Elati MNM, Mokhtar MH. 2017. Productive performance of growing Farafra lambs fed guar forage or guar silage. J Anim Poultry Prod Mansoura Univ. 8(3):41–47. doi:10.21608/JAPPMU.2017.45763.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas ME, Foster JL, McCuistion KC, Redmon LA, Jessup RW. 2013. Nutritive value, fermentation characteristics, and in situ disappearance kinetics of sorghum silage treated with inoculants. J Dairy Sci. 96(11):7120–7131. doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss K. 2017. Volatile organic compounds in silages – effects of management factors on their formation: a review. Slov J Anim. Sci. 50:55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Yücel C, Avcı M, Inal İ, Yücel D. 2017. Yield and silage quality of soybean-maize intercrop under different mixing ratios and harvest stages. Int J Agron Agri R. 10:95–105.
   Google Scholar