Growth and dry matter intake curve analysis of crossbred male calves in Ethiopia

References

• Akbaş Y, Alçiçek A, Önenç A, Güngör M. 2006. Growth curve analysis for body weight and dry matter intake in Friesian, Limousin x Friesian and Piemontese x Friesian cattle. Arch Anim Breed. 49(4):329–339. doi:10.5194/aab-49-329-2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemayehu M, Wondatir Z, Gojjamand Y. 2013. Evaluation of Friesian x Boran crossbred and Ethiopian highland zebu oxen with a reciprocal work effect on carcass characteristics. Livest Res. 25:1016–1021.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur P, Archer J, Herd R, Richardson E. 1998. A review of variation in feed efficiency of beef cattle. Paper Presented at the Proc. 6th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod.
   Google Scholar
• Bahashwan S, Alrawas AS, Alfadli S, Johnson E. 2015. Dhofari cattle growth curve prediction by different non-linear model functions. Livest Res Rural Dev. 26:236.
   Google Scholar
• Ceacero TM, Mercadante MEZ, Cyrillo JNdSG, Canesin RC, Bonilha SFM, de Albuquerque LG. 2016. Phenotypic and genetic correlations of feed efficiency traits with growth and carcass traits in Nellore cattle selected for postweaning weight. PLoS One. 11(8):e0161366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho Y, Yoon H, Park B, Ahn B, Jeon B, Park Y. 2002. Study on the optimum range of weight-age data for estimation of growth curve parameters of Hanwoo. J Anim Sci Technol. 44(2):165–170. doi:10.5187/JAST.2002.44.2.165.
   Google Scholar
• Demeke S, Neser F, Schoeman S. 2003. Variance components and genetic parameters for early growth traits in a mixed population of purebred Bos indicus and crossbred cattle. Livest Prod Sci. 84(1):11–21. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00074-5.
   Google Scholar
• Effa K, Hegde B, Kumsa T. 2006. Lifetime production and reproduction performances of Bos Taurus x Bos indicus crossbred cows in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiop J Anim Prod. 6(2):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Golze M. 2001. Wachstum, Schlachtleistung und Schlachtkörperqualität von Weidemastkälbern aus der Mutterkuhhaltung mit Fleischrindrassen. Arch Anim Breed. 44(6):621–628. doi:10.5194/aab-44-621-2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks R, Owens F, Gill D, Oltjen J, Lake R. 1990. Daily dry matter intake by feedlot cattle: influence of breed and gender. J Anim Sci. 68(1):245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearl LC. 1982. Nutrient requirements of ruminants in developing countries. Logan: International Feedstuffs Institute, Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochvilova M, Hyankova L, Knizetova H, Fiedler J, Urban F. 2002. Growth curve analysis in cattle from early maturity and mature body size. Czech J Anim Sci-UZPI. 47(4).
   Google Scholar
• Merera C, Galmessa U. 2013. Fattening performances of culled dairy bulls to boost benefits of dairy farmers in Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Livest Prod. 4(10):161–164. doi:10.5897/IJLP2013.0170.
   Google Scholar
• Merera C, Galmessa U, Lemma T, Kebede M, Dassalegn J. 2004. Study on the utilization and management of draft animals in east and west Wellega zones. ESAP Proceedings. 112–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mesfin R, Bekele T, Kitaw G, Dejene M, Kehaliew A. 2013. Growth performance of F1 and high grade Friesian-Boran crossbred calves fed on oilseed cake based concentrate supplements. Livest Res. 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• SAS. 2008. Statistical Analysis system user’s guide, Release 9.2 SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shumye M. 2021. Growth curve analysis of body weight in crossbred dairy cattle in central Ethiopia. Livest Res Rural Dev. 33:7.
   Google Scholar
• Shumye M, Wondatir Z, Kitaw G, Kahaliw A. 2021. Growth and fattening performances of Friesian-Boran crossbred bull calves fed on different protein supplements. Ethiop J Agric Sci. 31(4):57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sisay A. 2003. Growth performance of Boran cattle and their Simmental crosses in Ethiopia. ESAP Proceedings. 233–239.
   Google Scholar
• Tutkun M. 2019. Growth curve prediction of Holstein-Fresian bulls using different non-linear model functions. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 17(2):4409–4416. doi:10.15666/aeer/1702_44094416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar