Exploring stereotypes, bias, and expectations of women in the open data context

References

• Álvarez-Díaz, J. A. (2020). The necessary gender perspective for the analysis of health problems. Cirugia y Cirujanos, 88(3), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.19000865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, E., & Temkin, S. (2022). Gender as a social and cultural variable and health. National Institutes of Health. https://orwh.od.nih.gov/about/director/messages/gender-as-social-and-cultural-variable-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Black, C. F. (2016). Global gender gap report. In Encyclopedia of Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs350
   Google Scholar
• Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K. W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.06520
   Google Scholar
• Caetano, A., & Moran, L. (2021). Biographical research through the looking glass of pandemic times: Challenges and possibilities of online interviewing. Irish Journal of Sociology, 30(2), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035211022182
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, D. (2023). The gender data gap in AI: Confronting bias in machine learning. https://www.seldon.io/the-gender-data-gap-in-ai
   Google Scholar
• Cedefop. (2023). Bowse by occupation. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/skills-intelligence/occupations?occupation=3.35#2
   Google Scholar
• Cho, A. H., Johnson, S. A., Schuman, C. E., Adler, J. M., Gonzalez, O., Graves, S. J., Huebner, J. R., Blaine Marchant, D., Rifai, S. W., Skinner, I., & Bruna, E. M. (2014). Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management. PeerJ, 2(1), e542. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.542
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cirillo, D., Catuara-Solarz, S., Morey, C., Guney, E., Subirats, L., Mellino, S., Gigante, A., Valencia, A., Rementeria, M. J., Chadha, A. S., & Mavridis, N. (2020). Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0288-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comisión Europea. (2020). Comunicación de la comisión al parlamento europeo, al consejo, al comité económico y social europeo y al comité de las regiones. Una Unión de la igualdad: Estrategia para la Igualdad de Género 2020-2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0152
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, P. (2007). Metodología y técnicas de investigación social [Methodology and techniques of social research]. Mcgraw-Hill Interamericana de España.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curasi, C. F. (2001). A critical exploration of face-to face interviewing vs. computer mediated interviewing. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530104300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico [The interview, a flexible and dynamic resource]. Investigación En Educación Médica, 2(7), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72706-6
   Google Scholar
• Dimond, J., Fiesler, C., DiSalvo, B., Pelc, J., & Bruckman, A. (2012, October 27–31). Qualitative data collection technologies: A comparison of instant messaging, email, and phone. GROUP’12. http://jilldimond.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/group115-dimond.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Prats, P., & Cuesta, J. (2019). Women in academia from the 19th to the 21st century. Culture & History Digital Journal, 8(1), e001–e001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2020). Reviewing challenges and the future for qualitative interviewing. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(5), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1766767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erren, T. C., Groß, J. V., Shaw, D. M., & Selle, B. (2014). Representation of women as authors, reviewers, editors in chief, and editorial board members at 6 general medical journals in 2010 and 2011. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(4), 633–635. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización [Content validity and expert judgment: An approach to their use]. Avances En Medición, 6, 27–36. http://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/psicometria/files/7113/8574/5708/Articulo3_Juicio_d e_expertos_27-36.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). She figures 2021 gender in research and innovation: Statistics and indicators. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/06090
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2022). Gender equality in the EU justice and consumers. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2838/94579
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2019). Women in science and technology. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/EDN-20190211-1
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Sapena, A., Peset, F., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2011). Acceso a los datos públicos y su reutilización: Open data y open government [Access to and reuse of public data: Open data and open government]. Profesional de La Informacion, 20(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.may.03
   Google Scholar
• Gaínza Veloso, A., & Canales Cerón, E. M. (2006). La entrevista en profundidad individual [The individual in-depth interview]. In Metodologías de la investigación social (pp. 219–263). LOM Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Gogos, A., Langmead, C., Sullivan, J. C., & Lawrence, A. J. (2019). The importance of sex differences in pharmacology research. British Journal of Pharmacology, 176(21), 4087–4089. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorska, A. M., & Jemielniak, D. (2023). The invisible women: uncovering gender bias in AI-generated images of professionals. Feminist Media Studies, 23(8), 4370–4375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2263659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham, K. (2020). Mapping gender data gaps: And SDG era update. Data2x. https://data2x.org/resource-center/mappinggenderdatagaps/
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., Eberl, J. M., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2020). Qualitative interviews with irregular migrants in times of COVID-19: Recourse to remote interview techniques as a possible methodological adjustment. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.1.3563
   Google Scholar
• Hamplová, E., Janeček, V., & Lefley, F. (2022). Board gender diversity and women in leadership positions – Are quotas the solution? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(4), 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2022-0022
   Google Scholar
• Helbig, R., Von Höveling, S., Solsbach, A., & Gómez, J. M. (2021). Strategic analysis of providing corporate sustainability open data. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 28(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1501
   Google Scholar
• Herala, A., Kokkola, J., Kasurinen, J., & Vanhala, E. (2019). Strategy for data: Open it or hack it? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762019000200104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, E. (2019). The use of videoconferencing for qualitative interviewing: Opportunities, challenges, and considerations. Clinical Nursing Research, 28(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818803170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janghorban, R., Latifnejad Roudsari, R., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), 24152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. E. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. De Vries (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 307–326). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268247
   Google Scholar
• Lancharro Tavero, I., Gil García, E., Macías Seda, J., Romero Serrano, R., Calvo Cabrera, I. M., & Arroyo Rodríguez, A. (2018). The gender perspective in the opinions and discourse of women about caregiving. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da U S P, 52, e03370. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017009403370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: The need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. In Proceedings International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 14–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3195570.3195580
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. S., Guo, L. N., & Nambudiri, V. E. (2022). Towards gender equity in artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in dermatology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 29(2), 400–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. K. (2018). Sex as an important biological variable in biomedical research. BMB Reports, 51(4), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2018.51.4.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Freixa, P. (2022). ATLAS.ti para entrevistas semiestructuradas: guía de uso para un análisis cualitativo eficaz[ATLAS.ti for semi-structured interviews: A user’s guide for effective qualitative analysis]. Serie Editorial DigiDoc.
   Google Scholar
• Manasi, A., Panchanadeswaran, S., Sours, E., & Lee, S. J. (2022). Mirroring the bias: Gender and artificial intelligence. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2128254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meho, L. I. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, S., Newman, C., & Lancaster, K. (2019). Qualitative interviewing. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 391–410). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_77
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, H., & Madge, C. (2001). Cyber-mothers: Online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociological Research Online, 5(4), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, K. (2011). Essentials of qualitative interviewing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OpenCorporate. (2023). Our purpose. https://opencorporates.com/info/about/
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Watch. (2021). Open data inventory. Data2x. https://opendatawatch.com/publications/odin-open-data-inventory-2020-21-executive-summary/
   Google Scholar
• Open Data Watch. (2022). Transforming the data landscape: Solutions to close gender data gaps. Data2x. https://data2x.org/resource-center/transforming-the-data-landscape-solutions-to-close-gender-data-gaps/
   Google Scholar
• Otterbacher, J., Bates, J., & Cloug, P. (2017). Competent men and warm women: Gender stereotypes and backlash in image search results. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6620–6631). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025727
   Google Scholar
• Petzel, Z. W., & Casad, B. J. (2022). Take a chance on STEM: Risk-taking buffers negative effects of stereotype threat. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(3), 656–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1848766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prages. (2009). Guidelines for gender equality programmes in science. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Domínguez, L. R., Sixto-Costoya, A., & Ferrer-Sapena, A. (2024). Interview transcripts for the study entitled “Exploring stereotypes, bias, and expectations of women in the open data context” (Versión 1) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10698522
   Google Scholar
• Ruggieri, R., Pecoraro, F., & Luzi, D. (2021). An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council. Scientometrics, 126(2), 1647–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03802-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixto-Costoya, A., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Castelló-Cogollo, L., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2022). Gender presence on the editorial boards of journals in the Women’s Studies subject category. Women’s Studies International Forum, 93(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102617
   Google Scholar
• Sixto-Costoya, A., & Ferrer-Sapena, A. (2023). Datos abiertos y perspectiva de género, ¿por dónde vamos? Anuario ThinkEPI, 17, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a33
   Google Scholar
• Sociedad Max Planck. (2003). La Declaración de Berlín sobre acceso abierto. GeoTrópico, 1(2), 152–154.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, N. D., & Overholser, B. (2019). Examining gender disparity in medicine and setting a course forward. JAMA Network Open, 2(6), e196484. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon, A., & Pareek, V. (2019). Gender data gap. In A. Tandon, T. Mewa, & S. Chattapadhyay (Eds.), Handbook of gender and open data. https://cis.pubpub.org/pub/gender-data-gap/release/6
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2023). Gender data portal. https://genderdata.worldbank.org/
   Google Scholar
• Tomassini, C. (2021). Brechas de género en la ciencia: revisión sistemática de las principales explicaciones y agenda de investigación [Gender gaps in science: Systematic review of the main explanations and research agenda]. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25437
   Google Scholar
• Tonon, G. (2012). Reflexiones latinoamericanas sobre investigación cualitativa [Latin American reflections on qualitative research]. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez Y Juventud, 8(1). https://revistaumanizales.cinde.org.co/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana/article/view/606
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2014). Plan de Acción de la UNESCO para la prioridad Igualdad de Género (2014-2021). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227222_spa?posInSet=6&queryId=be8e8136-a047-40cd-9402-b072729bb296
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2016). Integrating a gender perspective into statistics. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/Standards-and-Methods/files/Handbooks/gender/Integrating-a-Gender-Perspective-into-Statistics-E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2022a). Full and equal access and participation for women and girls in science. https://www.un.org/en/observances/women-and-girls-in-science-day
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2022b). The sustainable development goals report 2019. United Nations publication issued by the Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Verdugo-Castro, S., García-Holgado, A., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2022). The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(8), e10300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Zhao, J., Yatskar, M., Chang, K. W., & Ordonez, V. (2019). Balanced datasets are not enough: Estimating and mitigating gender bias in deep image representations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.08489
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Gender and Health. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/gender
   Google Scholar