Using Feedback from Students to Remedy a Pedagogy of the Historically Disadvantaged: A Case Study of Law Teaching

References

• Badenhorst PJ, Pienaar JM, Mostert H 2006.Silber-berg and Schoeman’s the Law of Property. Durban: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs JB 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black S 1996. Student perceptions of teaching Methods: An analysis of how perceptions can impact upon the learning process. Journal of Professional Legal Education, 14: 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Caltabiano NJ, Caltabiano ML 2004. Students’ Evaluation of tertiary educational goals: The impact of lecturer and student characteristics. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4: 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Carl AE 1995. Teacher Empowerment through Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice. Cape Town: Juta & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of South Africa 1993. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Parliament of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes PY, Smith MJ 1999. Access, selection and admission to higher education: Maximising the use of the school-leaving examination. South African Journal of Higher Education, 13: 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS 2005. The SAGE Handbook f Qualitative Research. 3 Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Felder RM 2000. The scholarship of teaching. Chemi-cal Engineering Education, 34: 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons R, Vines P, Kozlina S 2006. Optimizing the first year experience in law: The law peer tutor program at the University of New South Wales. Legal Education Review, 16: 99–124.
   Google Scholar
• Fourie E, Coetzee E 2012. The use of a therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the teaching and Learning of law to a new generation of law students in South Africa. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 15: 367–390.
   Google Scholar
• Frame J 2003. Theorizing curriculum. In: M Coleman, M Graham-Jolly, D Middlewood (Eds.): Managing the Curriculum in South African Schools. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, pp. 17 — 34.
   Google Scholar
• Freire P 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Sea Burry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire P 1996. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson TL, Martin KJ 2002. Cooperative learning as one approach to teaching Family Law. Family Relations, 51: 351–360.
   Google Scholar
• Hess GF, Friedland S 1999. Techniques for Teaching Law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kok A 2007. Higher grade mathematics the formula for success? Establishing the odds for prospective LLB students. South African Law Journal, 124: 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski T 2010. True North: Navigating for the transfer of learning in legal education. Seattle University Law Review, 51: 51–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lam F 2011. The Socratic Method as an Approach to Learning and its Benefits. Honours Dissertation, Unpublished. Qatar: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Mathers N, Fox N, Hunn A 2009. Surveys and questionnaires. The National Institute for Health Re-search RDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire & the Humber.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone F 1996. Student peer mentors: A teaching and learning strategy designed to promote cooperative approaches to learning and the development of lifelong learning skills. Queensland University of Technology Law Journal, 12: 201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Mcquoid —Mason D 2006. Using Your Imagination to light Up Knowledge, Skills and Values for LLB Students: Lessons from South Africa. From http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/interact/lili/2006/papers/keynote.html (Retrieved 20 June 2009).
   Google Scholar
• McQuoid-Mason D 2007. Methods of teaching human rights: Some examples from Street Law programmes. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 5: 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Niedwiecki A 2012. Teaching for lifelong learning: Improving the metacognitive skills of law students through more effective formative assessment techniques Capital University Law Review, 40: 149–194.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt DD 1999. Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education. Malabar: FL Krieger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius E J 2002. Reading skills and mathematics. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16: 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Roosare KJ 2007. Practical aspects of teaching law in newly independent Central Europe: Experiences in Estonia and Lithuania. European Journal of Legal Education, 4: 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert WH 1986. Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm and Possibility. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shor I 1993. Education is politics: Paulo Freire’s Critical pedagogy. In: P MacLaren, P Leonard (Eds.): Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter London: Routledge, pp. 25-35.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey R 2009. “Best Practices” or not, it is time to rethink legal education. Clinical Law Review, 16: 32 1–333 .
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan WM, Colby A, Welch J, Bond WL, Schulman LS 2007. Educating Lawyers: Preparing for the Profession of Law. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner JW 2009. Reframing legal education’s “wicked problems”. Rutgers Law Review, 61: 867–1008.
   Google Scholar