Test Development Study on the Mental Rotation Ability

References

• Addepalli S 2005. Effects of Mental Rotation, Visual Aids and Training on Inspection Performance During Airport Baggage Inspection. Master Thesis,. India: Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University.
   Google Scholar
• Alias M, Black TR, Gray DE 2002. Effect of Instructions on Spatial Visualisation Ability in Civil Engineering Students.International Education Journal, 3 (1): 1-12. Fromhttp://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/Education/iej/articles/v3n1/alias/paper.pdf (Retrieved on 3 December 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Battista MT, Wheatley GH, Talsma G 1982. The importance of spatial visualization as cognitive Development for geometry learning in Preservice Elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13 (5): 332–340.
   Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova 0, Kozhevnikov M 2009. The New Object-Spatial-Verbal Cognitive Style Model: Theory and Measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23 (5): 638-663. From http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.1473/pdf (Retrieved on 2 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bock RD, Kolakowski D 1973. Further Evidence of Sex-Linked Major-Gene Influence on Human Spatial Visualization Ability. American Journal of Human Genetics, 24: 1-14. Fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmci762227/pdf/ajhg00446-0003.pdf (Retrieved on 20 January 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bölcskei A, Kovacs AZ, Kusar D 2013. New Ideas in Scoring the Mental Rotation Test. Journal of Built Environment, 1 (1): 59-69. From http://epa.oszk.hu/02400/02446/00001/pdf/epa02446jbe201301059-069.pdf (Retrieved on 5 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Burton LJ, Fogarty GJ 2003. The factor structure of visual imagery and spatial abilities. Intelligence, 31: 289–318.
   Google Scholar
• Çaliskan ÝÖ, Kaptan F 2009. Constructing science Process skills test. çagdas Egitim Dergisi, 34 (369): 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Campos A 2012. Measure of the Ability to Rotate Mental Images. Psicothema, 24 (3): 431-434. From http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4035.pdf. (Re-trieved on 29 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Campos A, Campos-Juanatey 2014. Mental Rotation and Object-Spatial-Verbal Cognitive Stiles. Revista de Estudios e Investigacion, 1 (1): 100-102. From http://revistas.udc.es/index.php/reipe/article/view/31/13 (Retrieved on 29 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng YL, Mix KS 2014. Spatial Training Improves Children’s Mathematics Ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15 (1): 2-11. From http://Www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186 (Retrieved on 2 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Çokluk Ö, Sekercioglu G, Biiyiiköztürk P 2010. (“ok DeoiPkenli Istatistik, (SPSS ye Lisrel Uygulamalari). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ 1951. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.Psychometrika, 16 (3): 297-334. From http://psych.colorado.edu/-carey/courses/psyc5112/readings/alphacronbach.pdf (Retrieved on 2 May 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Delgado AR, Prieto G 2004. Cognitive Mediators and Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics. Intelligence, 32: 25-32. From http://www.thinkingskillsclub.com (Retrieved on 02 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Feyzioglu B, Demirdag B, Akyildiz M, Altun E 2012. Ortaogretim Ogrencilerine Yonelik Bilimsel Siirey BecerileriT esti Gelistirilmesi: Geyerlikve Giivenirlik calismasi. Kuram ye Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 12 (13): 1887–1906.
   Google Scholar
• Gergelitsová ‘S. 2007. Computer Aided Development of Spatial Abilities, WDS’07 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, 246-250.Fromhttp://www.mff.cuni.cz/veda/konference/wds/proc/pdf07/wds07141m8gergelitsova.pdf (Retrieved on 10 November 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein D, Haldane D, Mitchell C 1990. Sex differences in Visual-Spatial Ability: The Role of Performance Factors.Memory and Cognition, 18 (5): 546-550. From http://www.springerlink.com/content/q72t6q966k2x4212/fulltext.pdf (Retrieved on 10 May 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gorska R, Sorby SA, Leopol C 1998. Gender Differences in Visualization Skills-An International Perspective. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 62 (3): 9-18. From http://edgj.org/index.php/EDGJ/article/view/115/111 (Retrieved on 2 December2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gözöm S, Aksayan S 2003. Kiiltiirlerarasi Olyek uyarlamasiiyin Rehber II: Psikometrik Ozelliklerve Kiiltiir-lerarasi Karsilastirma. Hemsirelikte Arastirma Gelistirme Dergisi, 1: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Waller DA 2005. Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: P Shah, A Miyake (Eds.):The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121-169.
   Google Scholar
• Heil M, Jansen-Osmann P 2008. Gender Differences in mathematical performance and mental rotation in 8 years old boys and girls. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2: 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kabakyi-Yurdakul I, Ursavas OF, Becit-Ysyitiirk G 2014. An Integrated Approach for Preservice Teachers’ Acceptance and use of technology: UTAUTPST Scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55: 21-36. From http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.2 (Retrieved on 30 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kimura D 1999. Sex and Cognition. Pt Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn SM, Behrmann M, Jeannero M 1995. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Mental Imagery. Neurop-sychologia, 33 (11): 1335-1344. From http://www.iwitts.com/html/okagaki.pdf (Retrieved on 10 May 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Linn MC, Petersen AC 1985. Emergence and characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis. Child Development, 56 (6): 1479-1498. From http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/1130467.pdf (Retrieved on 3 April 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Moe A 2009. Are Males Always Better Than Females In Mental Rotation? Exploring A Gender Belief Explanation. Learning and Individual Differences, 19: 21-27. From http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar-ticle/pii/s1041608008000216 (Retrieved on 20 October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe N, Bandura, MM, Taylor DG 1983. Sex Differences in Spatial Ability and Spatial Activities. Sex Roles, 9 (3), 377-386.From http://www.temple.edu/psychology/newcombe/documents/.pdf (Retrieved on 30 October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Okagaki L, Frensch PA 1994. Effects of Video Game Playing on Measures of Spatial Performance: Gender Effects in Late Adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15: 33-58. From http://www.iwitts.com/html/okagaki.pdf (Retrieved on 5 June 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Oostermeijer M, Boonen AJH, Jones J 2014. The Relation Between Children’s Constructive Play Activities, Spatial Ability, and Mathematical Word Problem-Solving Performance: A Mediation Analysis in Sixth-Grade Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 1–7. From http://journal.frontiersin.org/artic1e/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00782/full (Retrieved on 30 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Peters M 2005. Sex Differences and the Factor of Time in Solving Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotation Problems.Brain and Cognition: 57: 176-184. From http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/artic1e/pii/s0278262604002398 (Retrieved on 12 May 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C 1995. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different versions and Factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28: 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Quaiser-Pohl C 2003. The Mental Cutting Test “Schnit-te” and Picture Rotation Test-Two New Measures to Assess Spatial Ability. International Journal of Testing, 3 (3): 219-231. From http://userpages.unikoblenz.de/-quaiser/files/publikationen/ijt0303pp.219-231.pdf (Retrieved on 22 April 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shepard RN, Metzler J 1971. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects.Science, New Series, 171: 701-703. From http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/1731476.pdf (Retrieved on 7 February 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Stafford RE 1961. Sex Differences in Spatial Visualization as Evidence of Sex-linked Inheritance.Perceptual and Motor Skills,13: 428. From http://www.amsciepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.1961.13.3.428 (Retrieved on 12 September 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JM, Nuerk HC, Moeller K, Kadosh RC 2013. The Link between Mental Rotation Ability and Basic Numerical Representations.ActaPsychologica, 2: 234-331.From http://www.sciencedirect.com/Science/article/pii/s0001691813001200# (Retrieved on 29 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tosto MG, Hanscombe KB, Haworth CMA, Davis OSP, Petrill SA, Dale PS, Malykh S, Plomin R, Kovas Y 2014. Why do Spatial Abilities Predict Mathematical Performance? Developmental Science, 17 (3): 462-470. From http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.12138/epdf (Retrieved on 2 April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR 1978. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Per-ceptual and Motor Skills, 47: 599–604.
   Google Scholar
• Voyer D, Voyer SD, Bryden MP 1995. Magnitude of Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities: A Meta-Analysis and Consideration of Critical Variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 250-270. From http://psyc-net.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuyHYPERLINK“http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1995-20087-001“andHYPERLINK“http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1995-20087-001“id=1995-20087-001 (Retrieved on 30 March 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Wohlschläger A, Wohlschläger A 1998. Mental and Manual Rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (2): 397-412. From http://wexler.free.fr/library/files/wohlschl%e4ger%20(1998)%20mental%20and%20Manual%20rotation.pdf (Retrieved on 9 June 2010).
   Google Scholar