The Relationship between Readers’ Comprehension Skills and Awareness of Cohesive Relationships

References

• Abdollahi A, Rahmany R, Maleki A 2015. The effect of intra-sentential, inter-sentential and tagsentential switching on teaching grammar. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 36 (3): 848–868.
   Google Scholar
• Aidionlou A, Khodamard N, Azami J 2012. The effect of textual cohesive reference instruction on the Reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2 (5): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Altan A, Arhan S, Basar S, Oztiirker G, Yilmaz D 2008. Ilkögretim Tfirkçe 8 ders Kitabi. 1. Baski. Ankara: Devlet Kitaplari.
   Google Scholar
• Ayata SC 2005. Metin Dil Bilim ye Tfirkqe. Istanbul: Multilingual Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin M 2007. Dil Bilim El Kitabi. 2. Baski. Istanbul: 3 F Yayinevi.
   Google Scholar
• Aytas G 2008. Cagdas Gelismeler Isiginda Siir Tahlilleri. Ankara: Akyag.
   Google Scholar
• Best R, Ozuru Y, Floyd, R, McNamara DS 2006. Children’s text comprehension. Effects of genre, Knowledge, and text cohesion. In: SA Barab, KE Hay, DT Hickey (Eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Indiana, USA, 27 June-1 July, pp. 37-42.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge CA, Winogard PN 1982. Readers’ awareness of cohesive relationships during doze comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, XIV(3): 299–312.
   Google Scholar
• Can R 2012. Ortaögretim Ogrencilerinin Yazili Anlatimlarinda Paragraf Dfizeyinde Bagdasiklik ye Tutarlilik. Yayimlanmamis Doktora Tezi. Egitim Bilimleri Enstitiisii. Ankara: Gazi Oniversitesi.
   Google Scholar
• Cox BE, Shanahan T, Sulzby E 1990. Good and poor elementary readers’ use of cohesion in writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 25 (1): 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• De Beaugrande R, Dressier W 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich MF 1990. The processing of cohesion devices in text comprehension. Psychological Research, 53 (2): 169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 9th Edition. United States: Mc Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi M 2013. An investigation into the use of co-hesive devices in second language writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (9): 1615–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK, Hassan R 1976. Cohesion in English. New York: Longman Group UK Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Karasar N 2009. Bilimsel Arastirma Yeintemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Konstabel K, Lönnqvist J, Walkowitz G, Konstabel K, Verkasalo M 2012. The ‘Short Five’ (S5): Measuring personality traits using comprehensive single items. European Journal of Personality, 26: 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly T, McNamara DS 2007. Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for Strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43 :121–152.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcelik DA 2010. Test Hazirlama Kilavuzu. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan B 2004. Metin dil bilimi, metin dil bilimsel bagdasiklik ve Haldun Taner’in “Onikiye bir var” adli?trykiisiinde metin dil bilimsel bagdasiklik görönöm-leri. Cukurova Oniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitiisii Dergisi, 13 (1): 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Parvaz MH, Nodushan MA 2006. The Effect of Text Cohesion on Reading Comprehension. From http://karens’linguisticissues.com (Retrieved on 12 February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Sahin D 2011. Ilkögretim Tfirkçe 8 Ders Kitabi. Istanbul: Tav Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Silva M, Cain K 2015. The relations between lower and higher level comprehension skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107 (2): 321-331. Soruy A, Griffiths C 2015. Identity and the spoken grammer dilemma. System, 50: 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Shakiba A, Saif AA, Asadzadeh H, Ebrahimi QS 2013. Investigating the effect of local and global cohesion on improving reading comprehension of students with low and high prior knowledge. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3 (2): 551–555.
   Google Scholar
• Tanyolac ON 2005. Yazinsal Metin Cöziimlemesinde Kuramsal Yaklasimlar. Istanbul: Multilingual Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Wilawan S 2007. Lexical cohesion and metacognitive strategy training: An integrated approach to main idea comprehension. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 12: 102–125.
   Google Scholar
• Wu S 2010. Lexical cohesion in oral English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (1): 97–101.
   Google Scholar