The Evaluation of Landscape Equipment Components in Terms of Ergonomics

References

• Aksu OV, Demirel O 2012. Landscape designs in hospital gardens: The example of Trabzon city. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 12: 236–250.
   Google Scholar
• Aksu OV 2015. Design of equipment elements in natural recreation areas: Sample of Altindere Valley National Park. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 15: 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Arat Y 2011. Analysis of Traditional Turkish House Indoor Components Based on Antropometric Data: Konya Houses. PhD Thesis. Konya: Selcuk University.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan AR, Cinar H 2015. An Ergonomics Investigation into the design workshop. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 3: 347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Austin LR, Dunbar RT, Hulversan JP 1986. Graphics Standards for Landscape Architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar N, Tekel A, Ercoskun Yalciner 0 2008. An evaluation and classification of urban furniture on Ankara Ataturk Boulevard and relation with urban identity. Gazi University Journal of Faculty Engineering Architecture, 23: 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bayramoglu E, Ozdemir B 2010. The evaluation of the urban furniture through Uzun Sokak in Trabzon city in front of urban identity. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 12: 182–191.
   Google Scholar
• Bozdogan E, Ozturk S, Korkmaz E 2015. Determination of outdoor furniture on coastline recreation area of Asi River (Antakya District) and user satisfaction. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 381: 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut Y, Atabeyoglu 0, Yesil P 2008. A study on the evaluation of ergonomic situations of the equipment elements in the centre of Erzurum city. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14: 131-138.
   Google Scholar
• Coban E 2013. Effects of Urban Furniture on Their Spaces: The Case of Duzce. MSc Thesis. Duzce: Duzce University.
   Google Scholar
• Dawal SZM, Ismail Z, Yusuf K, Abdul-Rashid SH, Shala-him NSM, Abdullah NS, Kamil NSM 2015. Determination of the significant anthropometry dimensions for user-friendly designs of domestic furniture and appliances - Experience from a study in Malaysia. Measurement, 59: 205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Demirel HO, Zhang L, Duffy VG 2016. Opportunities for meeting sustainability objectives. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 51: 73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Dul J, Neumann WP 2009. Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Applied Ergonomy, 40: 745–752.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan Onur B, Demiroglu D 2016. Sustainable urban spaces: Ecological parks. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 66: 340–355.
   Google Scholar
• Ergenoglu AS, Aytug A 2007. Examination of changing paradigms and healing hospital concept in healthcare facilities with regard to architectural design. Yildiz Technic University Architecture Faculty E-Journal, 2: 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Eroglu E, Muderrisoglu H, Kesim GA 2012. The effect of seasonal change of plants compositions on visual perception. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20: 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Guang T, Tian DK 2014. Why is business anthropology important Anthropologist, 18: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gulgun B, Altug I 2006. A research on evaluating the Izmir Promenade applications’ appropriateness due to ergonomic standards. Journal of Ege University Agricultural Faculty, 43: 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Gunes A, Gulgun B 2007. Determination of planning criteria on recreational areas with Artificial Lakes in Izmir Buca Golet recreational area and Yedi Goller recreational areas as sample regions. Journal of Ege University Agricultural Faculty, 44: 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Harris CW, Dines NT 1998. Time-saver Standards for Landscape Architecture. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hassall M, Xiao T, Sanderson P, Neal A 2015. Human factors and ergonomics. In: James D Wright (Ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2.1d Edition. Oxford, England: Elsevier Science & Technology, pp. 297-305.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick HW 2000. The technology of ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1: 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Karakaya B, Kiper T 2011. Investigation of hospital outer space design in Edirne City. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 8: 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kartay A, Korkut AB 2009. Landscape architecture-an-thropometry relationship: The case of Istanbul. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 3: 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kelkit A, Saglik A, Saglik E 2012. Environmental Problems in urban coastal areas of settlement pressure: Case of Canakkale city. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 2: 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Kelkit A, Ozel AE 2004. A study on determination of recreational demands and inclinations of city people of Canakkale. International Journal of Urban Labour and Leisure, 6: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz Y 2015. The effect of a summer camp on social anthropological improvement of the kids in Turkey. Anthropologist, 19: 65–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kurdoglu O, Kurdoglu BC 2010. Determining recreational, scenic, and historical-cultural potentials of Landscape features along a segment of the ancient Silk Road using factor analyzing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170: 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lang J 1987. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Muderrisoglu H, Eroglu E, Ozkan S, Ak K 2006. Visual perception of tree forms. Building and Environment, 41: 796–806.
   Google Scholar
• Muderrisoglu H, Ozkan Aydin S, Ak K, Eroglu E 2013. Effects of user density levels on recreational walking experiences. Indoor and Built Environment, 22: 640–649.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Trabzon 2014. Municipality’s Environment and Sustainable Development Office, Report.
   Google Scholar
• Neufert EP 2002. Neufert. Architects’ Data. (B Baiche Ed.). 3rd Edition. UK: N. Walliman.
   Google Scholar
• Onder S, Polat AT, Ozturk A 2012. The evaluation of ergonomic situations of the equipment elements in Selcuk University Campus, Konya, Turkey. Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science, 1: 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Panero J, Zelnik M 1979. Human Dimensions and Interior Space, A Source Book of Design Reference Standards. London: The Architectural Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Patel T 2014. Introduction to ergonomics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44: 892–893.
   Google Scholar
• Radjiyev A, Qui H, Xiong S, Nam K 2015. Ergonomics and sustainable development in the past two decades (1992-2011): Research trends and how ergonomics can contribute to ustainable development. Applied Ergonomics, 46: 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin H, Savas B 2014. Disabilities and accessibility: Turkish sample. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3: 238–242.
   Google Scholar
• Sakici C, Var M 2014. The organization of Psychiatric Hospital Gardens (Open Space Therapy Units) and the criterions. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 14: 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sakici C 2014. The psychological contributions of natural site experiences in Kastamonu, Turkey. Anthropologist, 18: 991–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Siemieniuch CE, Sinclair MA, Henshaw M 2015. Global drivers, sustainable manufacturing and systems Ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 51: 104–119.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JR 2014. Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/ human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45: 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Yildizci AC 2001. Concept of Urban Furniture and Examination of Urban Furniture in Istanbul. Paper presented in Seminar on 1” International Symposium on Street Furniture, Istanbul, May 9 to 11, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Yoruk I, Gulgun B, Sayman M, Ankaya FU 2006. Examining the Ege university campus by the concept of ergonomy and anthropometry in the embrace of landscape architecture applications. Ege University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 43: 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Zink KJ 2014. Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45: 126–132.
   Google Scholar