References
- AL-Haj Ebrahem, M., Eidous, O. and kamil, G. A. (2009a). Estimating percentiles of Time-To-Failure distribution obtained from a linear degradation model using kernel density method. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 38, 1811 – 1822 doi: 10.1080/03610910903145130
- AL-Haj Ebrahem, M., Alodat M. and Arman, A. (2009 b). Estimating the time-to-failure distribution of a linear degradation model using a Bayesian approach. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 3(1), 27-42.
- Chen, J. M., and Lin, C. S. (2003). Optimal replenishment scheduling for inventory items with Weibull distributed deterioration and time-varying demand. Journal of Information & Optimization Science, 24(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/02522667.2003.10699552
- Chow, S.C., and Shao, J. (1991). Estimating drug shelf-life with random effects. Biometrics, 47, 1071–1079. doi: 10.2307/2532659
- Dandis, R. and AL-Haj Ebrahem, M. (2012). Designing degradation experiments using a Log–logistic distribution. Austrion Journal of Statistics, 41(4), 311-324. doi: 10.17713/ajs.v41i4.170
- Lu, C. J. and Meeker, W.Q. (1993). Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution. Technometrics, 35, 161–174. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1993.10485038
- Meeker, W. Q. and Escobar, L. A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. Wiley, New York.
- Robert, B.A. (2006). The new Weibull handbook
- Tseng, S. T. and Yu, H . F. (1997). A termination rule for degradation experiments. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 46, 130-133. doi: 10.1109/24.589938
- Wu, S. J. and Chang, C. T. (2002). Optimal design of degradation tests in presence of cost constraint. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 76, 109–115. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00123-5
- Yu, H. F. and Tseng, S. T. (1999). Designing a degradation experiment. Naval Research Logistics, 46, 689–706. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199909)46:6<689::AID-NAV6>3.0.CO;2-N
- Yu, H. F. and Tseng, S. T. (2004). Designing a degradation experiment with a reciprocal Weibull degradation rate. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 1, 47-63. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2004.11673064