References
- Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A meta – analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1).11–71. doi: 10.1111/peps.12185
- Dulebohn, J. H., Wu, D., & Liao, C. (2016). Does liking explain variance above and beyond LMX? a meta – analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1).149–166. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.008
- Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: how emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1165–73. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1165
- Glomb, T. M., & Tews, M. J. (2004). Emotional labor: a conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00038-1
- Li, A. N., & Tan, H. H. (2013). What happens when you trust your supervisor? mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 407–425. doi: 10.1002/job.1812
- Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two – wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0176
- Liang, S. G. (2017). Linking leader authentic personality to employee voice behaviour: a multilevel mediation model of authentic leadership development. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(3), 434–443. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1293656
- Ritzenhöfer, L., Brosi, P., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2017). Leader pride and gratitude differentially impact follower trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(3).445–459 doi: 10.1108/JMP-08-2016-0235
- Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In – role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195–1207. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.6.1195
- Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
- Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor – subordinate interactions: a laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487–499. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487
- Wazalwar, S. S., & Shrawankar, U. (2017). Interpretation of sign language into English using NLP techniques. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 38(6), 895–910. doi: 10.1080/02522667.2017.1372136
- Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First liking: making up your mind after a 100 – ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
- Wu, T. J., Wu, Y. C. J., Tsai, H. T., & Li, Y. B. (2017). Top management teams’ characteristics and strategic decision – making: A mediation of risk perceptions and mental models. Sustainability, 9, 2265. doi:10.3390/su9122265
- Xia, X., Yang, Y., & Hao, J. (2016). Application of fuzzy integral theory in group decision – making analysis. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 19(2), 269–275. doi: 10.1080/09720510.2015.1086169