A systematic literature review and comparative study of different software quality models

References

• R. S. Pressman, Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach. Palgrave macmillan, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• P. Jalote, An integrated approach to software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• D. Stanton, M. Potts, S. Vaidya, and M. Perreira, “System and method for component-based software development.” Google Patents, 06-Mar-2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. Serebrenik, N. Sidorova, and I. P. Heck-LaQuSo, “Product Software Quality.”
   Google Scholar
• N. S. Gill and P. Tomar, “Modified development process of component-based software engineering,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2010. doi: 10.1145/1734103.1734120
   Google Scholar
• D. Panwar, P. Tomar, H. Harsh, and M. H. Siddique, “Improved meta-heuristic technique for test case prioritization,” in Soft computing: Theories and applications, Springer, 2018, pp. 647–664.
   Google Scholar
• K. Sheoran and O. P. Sangwan, “An Insight of software quality models applied in predicting software quality attributes: A comparative analysis,” in 2015 4th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO)(Trends and Future Directions), 2015, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• X. Franch and J. P. Carvallo, “Using quality models in software package selection,” IEEE Softw., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2003. doi: 10.1109/MS.2003.1159027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Al-Kilidar, K. Cox, and B. Kitchenham, “The use and usefulness of the ISO/IEC 9126 quality standard,” in 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005., 2005, pp. 7-pp.
   Google Scholar
• D. Panwar and P. Tomar, “New mathematical model for software quality prediction of component-based software using shuffled frogleaping algorithm,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 266–275, 2017. doi: 10.1504/IJCAT.2017.086014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kumar, P. Tomar, and D. Panwar, “Designing of dynamic function for quality prediction of component-based software,” J. Stat. Manag. Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 777–785, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Krishnan, “Web Service Interface for Legacy Virtual Product Lifecycle Management System.” 2016.
   Google Scholar
• P. Bankhead et al., “QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Singh, P. K. Bhatia, and O. Sangwan, “Predicting software maintenance using fuzzy model,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2009. doi: 10.1145/1543405.1543425
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., & Lin, H. L. (2006). A simplified measurement scheme for software quality. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 27(3), 723-732. doi: 10.1080/02522667.2006.10699721
   Google Scholar
• Y. Singh, P. K. Bhatia, and O. Sangwan, “A review of studies on machine learning techniques,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Secur., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–84, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• S. R. Schach and X. Yang, “Metrics for targeting candidates for reuse: an experimental approach,” in Proceedings of the 1995 ACM symposium on Applied computing, 1995, pp. 379–383.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. S. Boxall and S. Araban, “Interface metrics for reusability analysis of components,” in 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings., 2004, pp. 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., & Saha, A. (2017). Optimization of object-oriented testing using firefly algorithm. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 38(6), 873-893. doi: 10.1080/02522667.2017.1372135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. S. Sandhu, D. S. Salaria, and H. Singh, “A comparative analysis of fuzzy, neuro-fuzzy and fuzzy-GA based approaches for software reusability evaluation,” Proc Worlds Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 29, 2008.
   Google Scholar