References
- Åström, F., Hammarfelt, B., Hansson, J. (2017). Scientific publications as boundary objects: theorising the intersection of classification and research evaluation, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Uppsala, Sweden, June, 2016, Information Research, Vol. 3 No 1, http://informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1623.html
- Bonaccorsi, A. (2015). La valutazione possibile. Teoria e pratica nel mondo della ricerca. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Butler, L., McAllister, I. (2011) ‘Evaluating university research performance using metrics,’ European Political Science, No 10, pp 44-58 doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.13
- Cinzia Daraio (2017). A Framework for the Assessment of Research and Its Impacts, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp 7–42, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0018
- Consortium IOO-S (2020). Methodology of Bulgarian University Ranking System 2020. Ministry of Science and Education. https://rsvu.mon.bg/rsvu4/#/documents
- Constant, N., Roberts, L. (2017). Narratives as a mode of research evaluation in citizen science: understanding broader science communication impacts, Journal of Science Communication Vol. 16 No 04, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16040203
- Deneva, A., Lilova, R. (2016). Обучението в Докторантура като Форма за Споделяне на Знания - Организационни и Финансови Аспекти [Obuchenieto v Doktorantura kato Forma za Spodelyane na Znania - Organizatsionni i Finansovi Aspekti]. Economic well-being through knowledge sharing Conference. Svishtov, Bulgaria. http://hdl.handle.net/10610/3051
- Directorate-General for Research & Innovation (2015). Peer Review of the Bulgarian Research and Innovation system. European Commission. https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/library/peer-review-bulgarian-research-and-innovation-systems-executive-summary-bulgarian
- Directorate-General for Research (2008). Commission Recommendation on the management of intellectual property in knowledge transfer activities and Code of Practice for universities and other public research organisations. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/ip_recommendation.pdf
- ESF, ALLEA (2009). Research at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. https://web.archive.org/web/20140423163855/ http://www.bas.bg/fce/001/0149/files/BAS_Eval_RMC_Report_Vol_1_(27Nov09).pdf
- European Commission (n.d.). What is Horizon 2020?. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020
- Feist, G. J. (1997) ‘Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important?’ Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 10, No 4, pp 325-335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1004_4
- Garfield, E. (1955) ‘Citation Indexes for Science. A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas’, Science No 122, pp 108–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
- Garfield, E. (1979) Citation Indexing, Philadelphia: ISI
- Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo (2017). Research evaluation of author’s citation-based performance through the relative author superiority index, Transinformação Vol. 29 No 2, https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892017000200006
- Gutzman, K.E., Bales, M.E., Belter, C.W., Chambers, T., Chan, I., Holmes, K.L., Lu Y.L., Palmer, L.A., Reznik-Zellen, R.C., Sarli, C.C., Suiter, A.M., Wheeler, T.R. (2018). Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries, Journal of medical library association Vol. 106, No 1, DOI: doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.205
- Hammarfelt, B., Rushforth, A.D. (2017). Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation, Research Evaluation, Vol. 26, No 3, pp169–180, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx018
- Horacio Rivera (2018). Inappropriate Authorship and Kinship in Research Evaluation, J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Mar 26; Vol. 33, No 13: e105 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e105
- Ishikawa, M. (2009) ‘University rankings, global models, and emerging hegemony: Critical analysis from Japan,’ Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 13, No 2, pp: 159173 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308330853
- Jemala, M. (2017). New research study on technology patents progress in developing EU countries. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 10(2), 116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/ijasm.2017.086153
- Köse, M., Korkmaz, M. (2019) ‘Why are some universities better? An evaluation in terms of organizational culture and academic performance,’ Higher University Research and Development 1-14
- Li, F. Yi, Y., Guo, X., Qi, W. (2012) Performance evaluation of research universities in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: based on a two-dimensional approach,’ Scientometrics No 90, pp 531-42 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0544-1
- Milzow, K., Reinhardt, A., Soderberg, S., Zinocker, K. (2018). Understanding the use and usability of research evaluation studies, Research Evaluation, Vol. 28, No 1, 2019, pp 94–107, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy040
- Ministry of Education and Science, https://www.mon.bg/en/
- Ministry of Science and Education (2017). National program “Young scientists and Postdoctoral candidates”. https://www.mon.bg/bg/100542
- Moed, H.F. (2005) Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation, Heidelberg: Springer.
- National Center for Information and Documentation, https://nacid.bg/en/home/
- National Evaluation and Accreditation Agency, https://www.neaa.government.bg/en/home-en?catid=0
- National Science Fund. (n.d.). National Scientific Research Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria 2020. https://www.fni.bg/?q=node/20
- National Statistical Institute, https://www.nsi.bg/en
- Paijč, D. (2014) ‘Globalization of the social sciences in Eastern Europe: Genuine break-through or a slippery slope of the research evaluation practice,’ Scientometrics, 1-20
- Patent Office of the Republic of Bulgaria, https://www.bpo.bg/en/home
- RAE (2001) Research Assessment Exercise, available at http://www.rae.ac.uk/2001/
- Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W.. (2017). Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0065-0
- Rhodri Thomas (2018) Questioning the Assessment of Research Impact Illusions, Myths and Marginal Sectors, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95723-4
- Scopus, https://www.scopus.com/home.uri
- Sporn, B. (1996) ‘Managing university culture: An analysis of the relationship between institutional culture and management approaches,’ Higher Education, Vol. 32 No 1, pp: 41-61 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139217
- Strielkowski, W., Gryshova, I, Shcherbata, M. (2017). Predatory Publishing and Beall’s List: Lessons For The Countries Adapting Novel Research Evaluation Criteria, Science and education, No 8, pp 39-43, Odessa, DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-8-5
- Tusting, K. (2018). The genre regime of research evaluation: contradictory systems of value around academics’ writing, Language and Education, Vol. 32, No 6, pp 477-493, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1505905
- Upton, S., Vallance, P. & Goddard, J. (2014). From outcomes to process: evidence for a new approach to research impact assessment, Research Evaluation, 23 (4), 352–365, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu021
- Vutsova, A. (2006). Research Evaluation – Bulgarian Case, Bulgarian Integration into Europe & NATO. 2006, Vol. 8, No 1
- Vutsova, A. (2014). Influence of the EU Instruments on the Institutional Development of Higher Education and Science, Zvezdi, Sofia
- Web of Science, Clarivate Analytics, http://apps.webofknowledge.com
- Zhang L, Rousseau R, Sivertsen G (2017). Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation, PLoS ONE Vol. 12, No 3: e0174205, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174205