Effect of lifestyle changes and consumption patterns on environmental impact: a comparison study of Pakistan and China

References

• Abrahamse W, Steg L. 2009. How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? J Econ Psychol. 30(5):711–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aized T, Mehmood S, Anwar Z. 2017. Building energy consumption analysis, energy saving measurements and verification by applying HAP software. Pak J Eng Appl Sci. 21:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Akram W, Henneberry S 2016. Consumption patterns of urban Punjab of Pakistan: evidence from HIES 2013–2014. Annual Meeting, Jul 31–Aug 2, Boston, MA (No. 237308), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Y. 2017. Carbon, water and land use accounting: consumption vs production perspectives. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 67:921–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Y, Ciaschini M, Socci C, Pretaroli R, Severini F. 2017. An analysis of CO2 emissions in Italy through the Macro Multiplier (MM) approach. J Clean Prod. 149:238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Y, Rasheed Z, Muhammad N, Yousaf S. 2018. Energy optimization in the wake of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). J Control Decis. 5(2):129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Big Data Analysis Series. 2016. Short roundup on transport infrastructure in Pakistan, Gallup Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Jiang Z. 2008. Changing of energy consumption patterns from rural households to urban households in China: an example from Shaanxi Province, China. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 12(6):1667–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capatino C, Peri G, Rizzo G, Ferrante P. 2017. Towards a holistic environmental impact assessment of marble quarrying and processing: proposal of a novel easy to use IPAT based method. Environ Monit Assess. 189(3):108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertow MR. 2008. The IPAT equation and its variants. J Ind Ecol. 4(4):13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Commoner B, Corr M, Stamler P. 1971. The closing circle: nature, man and technology. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Crockett J. 1967. Consumer expenditures and incomes in Greece. Vol. 17. Center of Planning and Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Deitz T, Rosa EA. 1997. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 94:175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesenford M. 2002. I=PAT or I=PBAT?. Ecological. 42:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich P, Holdren J. 1971. Impact of population growth. Science. 171(3977):1212–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejughemre UJ. 2014. Lifestyle transitions and the developing world: reflections on the implications for health, well-being and wealth. J Hosp Adm. 3(2):70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M, Hadjimichael T, Lanahan L, Kemeny T. 2016. The logic of economic development: a definition and model of Investment. Environ Plann C: Government Policy. 34(1):5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hay F, Sinha R. 1972. Analysis of food expenditure patterns of industrial workers and their families in a developing country. J Dev Stud. 8(4):425–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubacek K, Guan D, Barua A. 2007. Changing lifestyles and consumption patterns in developing countries: a scenario analysis for China and India. Futures. 39(9):1084–1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Jain P. 2016. Population and development: impacts on environmental performance. Chinese J Popul Resour Environ. 14(3):208–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joon V, Chandra A, Bhattacharya M. 2009. Household energy consumption pattern and socio-cultural dimensions associated with it: a case study of rural Haryana, India. Biomass Bioenergy. 33(11):1509–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan K, Shah A, Khan J. 2016. Electricity consumption patterns: comparative evidence from Pakistan’s Public and Private Sectors. Lahore J Econ. 21(1):99–122.
   Google Scholar
• NTDC (National transmission and Dispatch Company). 2016–2017. Power system statistics. 42nd ed. Karachi: Power System Planning, National Transmission and Dispatch Company.
   Google Scholar
• Olson R. 1994. Alternative images of a sustainable future. Futures. 26(2):156–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradip PK, Kalbar PP, Birkved M, Hauschild M, Kabins S, Nygaard SE. 2018. Environmental impact of urban consumption patterns: drivers and focus points. Resour Conserv Recycl. 137:260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin P. 1993. Methods for estimating the population contribution to environmental change. Ecol Econ. 15(3):225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray R. 1982. The testing and estimation of complete demand systems on household budget surveys. Eur Econ Rev. 17(3):349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca J. 2002. The IPAT formula and its limitations. Ecol Econ. 42:1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman R, Cansino JM, Rodas JA. 2018. Analysis of main drivers of CO2 emission changes in Colombia (1990–2012) and its political implications. Renewable Energy. 116:402–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamim F, Ahmad E. 2007. Understanding household consumption patterns in Pakistan. J Retailing and Consume Serv. 14(2):150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui R. 1982. An analysis of consumption pattern in Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev. 21(4):275–296.
   Google Scholar
• State Statistical Bureau of China. 2002. China statistical yearbook 2001. Beijing: State Statistical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Waggoner P, Ausubel J. 2002. A framework for sustainability science: a renovated IPAT identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 99(12):7860–7865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wang F, Zhang XL, Yang Y, Su YX, Ye YY, Yang HG. 2017. Examining the driving factors of energy related carbon emissions using the extended STIRPAT model based on IPAT identity in Xingjiang. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 67:51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh JC, Liao CH. 2017. Impact of population and economic growth on carbon emissions in Taiwan using an analytical tool STIRPAT. Sustainable Environ Res. 27(1):41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York R, Rosa E, Dietz T. 2002. Bridging environmental science with environmental policy: plasticity of population, affluence, and technology. Soc Sci Q. 83(1):18–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T. 2003. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ. 46(3):351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar