Data fusion and classifier ensemble techniques for vegetation mapping in the coastal Everglades

References

• Benz U, et al. 2004. Multiresolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 58:239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 65:2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 45:5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). 2012. Available from:http://www.evergladesplan.org/ [Accessed 27 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Congalton R, Mead RA. 1983. A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photointerpretation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 49:69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan JC-W, Paelinckx D. 2008. Evaluation of Random Forest and Adaboost tree based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 112:2999–3011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-C, Lin C-J. 2011. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. Available from:http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm [Accessed 27 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Cho MZ, et al. 2012. Mapping tree species composition in South African savannas using an integrated airborne spectral and LiDAR system. Remote Sensing of Environment. 125:214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M.M., et al., 2003. Random Forests of binary hierarchical classifiers for analysis of hyperspectral data. In: IEEE workshop on advances in techniques for analysis of remotely sensed data, 27–28 October 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Davis SM, et al. 1994. Landscape dimension, composition, and function in a changing everglades ecosystem. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC, editors. Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach, FL: St Lucie Press; p. 419–444.
   Google Scholar
• Doren RF, Rutchey K, Welch R. 1999. The Everglades: a perspective on the requirements and applications for vegetation map and database products. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 65:155–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du P, et al. 2012. Multiple classifier system for remote sensing image classification: a review. Sensors. 12:4764–4792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC). 2012. [online]. Available from:http://www.fleppc.org/list/11list.html [Accessed 27 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80:185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody GM. 2004. Thematic map comparison, evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 70:627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerling GW, et al. 2007. Classification of floodplain vegetation by data fusion of spectral (CASI) and LiDAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 28:4263–4284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gislason PO, Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR. 2006. Random Forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters. 27:294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green AA, et al. 1988. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 26:65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin S, Rogan J, Runfola DM. 2011. Application of spectral and environmental variables to map the Kissimmee prairie ecosystem using classification trees. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 48:299–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire B, et al. 2012. An evaluation of bagging, boosting, and random forests for land-cover classification in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 49:623–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall M, et al. 2009. The WEKA data mining software, an update. SIGKDD Explorations. 11:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ham J, et al. 2005. Investigation of the Random Forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 43:492–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harken J, Sugumaran R. 2005. Classification of Iowa wetlands using an airborne hyperspectral image: a comparison of the spectral angle mapper classifier and an object-oriented approach. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 31:167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill RA, Thomson AG. 2005. Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LIDAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 26:3763–3779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano A, Madden M, Welch R. 2003. Hyperspectral image data for mapping wetland vegetation. Wetlands. 23:436–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Davis LS, Townshend JRG. 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 23:725–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, et al. 2010. Fusing optical and radar data to estimate sagebrush, herbaceous, and bare ground cover in Yellowstone. Remote Sensing of Environment. 114:251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes GF. 1968. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 14:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C, Chang C, Lin C. 2010. A practical guide to support vector classification. Taipei City, Taiwan: National Taiwan University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Xie Z. 2011. Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 66:473–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JW. 2011. Remote sensing of vegetation pattern and condition to monitor changes in Everglades biogeochemistry. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 41:64–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones TG, Coops NC, Sharma T. 2010. Assessing the utility of airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data for species distribution mapping in the coastal Pacific Northwest, Canada. Remote Sensing of Environment. 114:2841–2852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal M, Phinn S. 2011. Hyperspectral data for mangrove species mapping: A comparison of pixel-based and object-based approach. Remote Sensing. 3:2222–2242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuncheva LI. 2004. Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Landis J, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence RL, Wood SD, Sheley RL. 2006. Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman and Cutler classifications (Random Forest). Remote Sensing of Environment. 100:356–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Xia M. 2010. Assessing object-based classification, advantages and limitations. Remote Sensing Letters. 1:187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden M, Jones D, Vilchek L. 1999. Photointerpretation key for the Everglades vegetation classification system. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 65:171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson BF, Halley R. 1996. The south Florida environment – a region under stress. US Geological Survey Circular; p. 1134.
   Google Scholar
• Melgani F, Bruzzone L. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 42:1778–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Seco, F., et al., 2006. Comparison of classifier fusion methods for classification in pattern recognition tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 joint IAPR international conference on structural, syntactic, and statistical pattern recognition.
   Google Scholar
• Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C. 2010. Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 66:247–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo L, et al. 2012. Classification of savanna tree species, in the Greater Kruger National Park region, by integrating hyperspectral and LiDAR data in a Random Forest data mining environment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 69:167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl C, Van Genderen JL. 1998. Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 19:823–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Galiano VF, et al. 2012. An assessment of the effectiveness of a Random Forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 67:93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan J, Chen D. 2004. Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Progress in Planning. 61:301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutchey K, Schall T, Sklar F. 2008. Development of vegetation maps for assessing Everglades restoration progress. Wetlands. 28:806–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw GA, Burke HK. 2003. Spectral imaging for remote sensing. Lincoln Laboratory Journal. 14:3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg AHS. 2006. Data fusion for remote sensing applications. In: Chen CH, editor. Signal and image processing for remote sensing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; p. 515–537.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble. 2011. eCognition Developer 8.64.1 reference book.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik VN. 1995. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Warner T. 2011. Kernel-based texture in remote sensing image classification. Geography Compass. 5:781–798.
   Google Scholar
• Waske B, et al. 2009. Mapping of hyperspectral AVIRIS data using machine-learning algorithms. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 35:S106–S116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch R, Madden M, Doren RF. 1999. Mapping the Everglades. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 65:163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Q, et al. 2006. Object-based detailed vegetation classification with airborne high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 72:799–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J. 2010. Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion. 1:5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Xie Z. 2012. Combining object-based texture measures with a neural network for vegetation mapping in the Everglades from hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 124:310–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Xie Z., accepted. Object-based vegetation mapping in the Kissimmee River watershed using HyMap data and machine learning techniques. Wetlands.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar