Object vs. pixel: a systematic evaluation in urban environments

References

• Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Seijmonsbergen AC, Duivenvoorden JF. 2012. Optimizing land cover classification accuracy for change detection, a combined pixel-based and object-based approach in a mountainous area in Mexico. Appl Geogr. 34 : 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonarakis AS, Richards KS, Brasington J. 2008. Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ. 112 : 2988–2998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz M, Schape A. 2000. Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58 : 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Benz U, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58 : 239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 65 : 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell J. 2002. Introduction to remote sensing. 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford press p. 620.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve C, Kelly M, Kearns FR, Morltz M. 2008. Classification of the wildland–urban interface: a comparison of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 32 : 317–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton RG. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 37 : 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Definiens. 2008. Definiens developer 7.0, User guide, Definiens AG, Trappentreustr. 1, D-80339. Munchen, Germany. p. 506).
   Google Scholar
• Desclée B, Bogaert P, Defourny P. 2006. Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sens Environ. 102 : 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdas Imagine. 1999. Erdas field guide. 5th ed. Atlanta, GA: Erdas, Inc p. 672.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Mas JF, Maathuis BHP, Zhang XM, Van Dijk PM. 2006. Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches-a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens. 27 : 4039–4051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im J, Jensen JR, Hodgson ME. 2008. Object-based land cover classification using high posting density lidar data. GISci Remote Sens. 45 : 209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JR. 2005. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. 3rd ed. Upper-Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Xie Z. 2011. Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 66 : 473–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Warner TA, Madden M, Atkinson D. 2011. Multi-scale texture segmentation and classification of salt marsh using digital aerial imagery with very high spatial resolution. Int J Remote Sens. 32 : 2825–2850. doi:10.1080/01431161003745608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaswamy J, Bawa KS, Ganeshaiah KN, Kiran MC. 2009. Quantifying and mapping biodiversity and ecosystem services: utility of a multi-season NDVI based Mahalanobis distance surrogate. Remote Sens Environ. 113 : 857–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW. 2008. Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lu D, Weng Q. 2004. Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscape in Indianapolis with Landsat ETM+ imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 70 : 1053–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myint SW, Giri CP, Wang L, Zhu Z, Gillette S. 2008. Identifying mangrove species and their surrounding land use and land cover classes using an object oriented approach with a lacunarity spatial measure. GISci Remote Sens. 45 : 188–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q. 2011. Per-pixel versus object-based classification of Urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 115 : 1145–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myint SW, Stow D. 2011. An object-oriented pattern recognition approach for Urban classification. In: Yang X, ed. Urban remote sensing monitoring, synthesis and modeling in the Urban environment. Chichester: Wiley, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Navulur K. 2007. Multispectral image analysis using the object-oriented paradigm. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Frances Group.
   Google Scholar
• Platt RV, Rapoza L. 2008. An evaluation of an object-oriented paradigm for land use/land cover classification. Prof Geogr. 60 : 87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stow D, Lopez A, Lippitt C, Hinton S, Weeks J. 2007. Object-based classification of residential land use within Accra, Ghana based on QuickBird satellite data. Int J Remote Sens. 28 : 5167–5173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JS, Briggs JM. 2007. An object-oriented approach to urban forest mapping with high-resolution, true-color aerial photography. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 73 : 577–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter V. 2004. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 58 : 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Sousa WP, Gong P. 2004. Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 25 : 5655–5668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Mas JF, Maathuis BHP, Xiangmin Z, Van Dijk PM. 2006. Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches – a case study in a coal fire area Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens. 27 : 4039–4055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Bauer ME. 2006. Mapping impervious surface area using high resolution imagery: a comparison of object-based and per pixel classification. In: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference Proceedings; 2006; Reno, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou WQ, Troy A, Grove M. 2008. Object-based land cover classification and change analysis in the Baltimore metropolitan area using multitemporal high resolution remote sensing data. Sensors. 8 : 1613–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar