Advanced differential interferometry synthetic aperture radar techniques for deformation monitoring: a review on sensors and recent research development

References

• Allen TR, Wanga Y, Gore B. 2013. Coastal wetland mapping combining multi-date SAR and LiDAR. Geocarto Int. [16 pp., advance online publication]. doi:10.1080/10106049.2013.768297.
   Google Scholar
• Arjona A, Monells D, Fernandez J, Duque S, Mallorqui J. 2010. Deformation analysis employing the coherent pixel technique and ENVISAT and ERS images in Canary Islands. Fringe 2009 Workshop; 30 Nov–4 Dec 2009; Frascati, Italy; Vol. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Arjona A, Santoyo MA, Fernández J, Monells D, Prieto JF, Pallero JLG, Prieto E, Seco A, Luzón F, Mallorquí J. 2010. On the applicability of an advanced dinsar technique near Itoiz and Yesa Reservoirs, Navarra, Spain. Fringe 2009 Workshop; 30 Nov–4 Dec 2009; Frascati, Italy; Vol. 2009, p. 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bamler R, Kampes B, Adam N, Suchandt S. 2005. Assessment of slow deformations and rapid motions by radar interferometry. In: Fritsch D, editor. Photogrammetric week 05. Heidelberg: Wichmann Verlag; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya A, Arora MK, Sharma ML. 2012. Usefulness of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry for digital elevation model (DEM) generation and estimation of land surface displacement in Jharia coal field area. Geocarto Int. 27:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Sanchez P, Duque S, Mallorqui JJ, Monells D. 2007. Analysis of highly non-linear deformations due to mining activity with dinsar: PSIC4 test site. Envisat Symposium 2007; 2007 April 23–27; Montreux, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Sanchez P, Mallorqui JJ, Duque S, Monells D. 2008. The coherent pixels technique (CPT): an advanced dinsar technique for nonlinear deformation monitoring. Pure Appl. Geophys. 165:1167–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calò F. 2012. Doris project: the european downstream service forlandslides and subsidence risk management. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). 2012 IEEE International; 2012 July 22–27; Naples, Italy; p. 3018–3021.
   Google Scholar
• Canisius J, Honda K, Tokunaga M. 2003. Detection of volcanic deposits on Mount Mayon using detection of volcanic deposits on Mount Mayon using SAR interferometry. Geocarto Int. 18:37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Canova F, Tolomei C, Salvi S, Toscani G, Seno S. 2012. Land subsidence along the Ionian coast of SE Sicily (Italy), detection and analysis via Small Baseline Subset (SBAS) multitemporal differential SAR interferometry. Earth Surf Proc Land. 37:273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro Cuenca M, Hooper AJ, Hanssen RF. 2011. A new method for temporal phase unwrapping of persistent scatterers InSAR time series. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 49:4606–4615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini L, Fornaro G, Peduto D. 2010. Advanced low- and full-resolution DInSAR map generation for slow-moving landslide analysis at different scales. Eng Geol. 112:29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casu F, Manzo M, Lanari R. 2006a. A quantitative assessment of the SBAS algorithm performance for surface deformation retrieval from DInSAR data. Remote Sens Environ. 102:195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casu F, Manzo M, Lanari R. 2006b. Performance analysis of the SBAS algorithm for surface deformation retrieval. Fringe 2005 Workshop; Frascati, Italy; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Crosetto M, Crippa B. 2005. State of the art of land deformation monitoring using differential SAR interferometry. ISPRS Hannover Workshop 2005: High Resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial, Information; 2005 May 17–20; Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Crosetto M, Pasquali P. 2008. DSM generation and deformation measurement from SAR data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2:157–167.
   Google Scholar
• ESA 2012. ESA: Observing the Earth; [cited 2013 Jan 18]. Available from: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/GMES/Sentinel-3
   Google Scholar
• Fan J, Zhao H, Tu P, Wang Y, Guo X, Ge D, Liu G. 2010. CRInSAR for landslide deformation monitoring: a case in threegorge area. IEEE, IGARSS International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; Honolulu, HI; p. 3956–3959.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández J, Arjona A, Prieto JF, Santoyo MA, Seco A, Monells D Pallero JLG, Prieto E, Luzón F, Mallorquí JJ. 2009. Application of CPT, an advanced DInSAR technique, to study surface displacement near Itoiz dam, Navarra, Spain. 95th Journées Luxembourgeoises de Géodynamique. p. 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F. 2000. Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 38:2202–2212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti A, Prati A, Rocca F, Casagli N, Farina P, Young B. 2005. Permanent scatterers technology: a powerful state of the art tool for historic and future monitoring of landslides and other terrain instability phenomena. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E editors. Landslide risk management: Proceedings of the International Conference on landslide risk management. Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Furuya M, Mueller K, Wahr J. 2007. Active salt tectonics in the Needles District, Canyonlands (Utah) as detected by interferometric synthetic aperture radar and point target analysis: 1992–2002. J Geophys Res. 112:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini F, Lombardini F. 2005. Multibaseline cross-track SAR interferometry: a signal processing perspective. IEEE A&E Syst Mag. 20:71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera G, Tomás R, Lopez-Sanchez JM, Delgado J, Vicente F, Mulas J, Cooksley G, Sancheze M, Duroe J, Arnaude A, et al. 2009. Validation and comparison of advanced differential interferometry techniques: Murcia metropolitan area case study. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 64:501–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAXA. (2012). Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2). Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jan 18]; Available from: http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/alos2/index_e.html.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez J, Romero R, Carrasco D, Martínez A, Mallorquí JJ, Blanco P, Navarrete D. 2005. Advanced DInSAR based on coherent pixels: development and results using cpt technique. Fringe 2005 Workshop; Frascati, Italy; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kampes B, Adam N. 2005. The STUN algorithm for persistent scatterer interferometry. Fringe ATSR Workshop 2005: Advances in SAR Interferometry from ENVISAT and ERS missions; 2005 28 Nov–2 Dec; Frascati, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Kampes B, Adam N. 2006. The STUN algorithm for persistent scatterer interferometry. In Lacoste H, editor. Fringe 2005 Workshop. Frascat: ESA Publications Division ESTEC; p. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kampes BM, Hanssen RF. 2004. Ambiguity resolution for permanent scatterer interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 42:2446–2453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyi LW, Kaufmann V. 2003. Estimation of rock glacier surface deformation using SAR interferometry data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 41:1512–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanari R, Casu F, Manzo M, Lundgren P. 2007. Application of the SBAS-DInSAR technique to fault creep: a case study of the Hayward fault, California. Remote Sens Environ. 109:20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanari R, Casu F, Manzo M, Zeni G, Berardino P, Manunta M, Pepe A. 2007. An overview of the small baseline subset algorithm: a DInSAR technique for surface deformation analysis. Pure Appl Geophys. 164:637–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauknes TR, Dehls J, Larsen Y, Høgda KA, Weydahl DJ. 2005. A comparison of SBAS and PS ERS INSAR for subsidence monitoring in Oslo, Norway. Fringe ATSR Workshop 2005: Advances in SAR Interferometry from ENVISAT and ERS missions; 2005 28 Nov–2 Dec; Frascati, Italy; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lee I, Chang H-C, Ge L. 2005. GPS campaigns for validation of InSAR derived DEMs. J Global Positioning Syst. 4:82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lu L, Liao M. 2008. Subsidence measurement with PS-INSAR techniques in Shanghai Urban. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XXXVII:173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Marghany M. 2011. Three-dimensional visualisation of coastal geomorphology using fuzzy B-spline of dinsar technique. Int J Phys Sci. 6:6967–6971.
   Google Scholar
• Meisina C, Zucca F, Fossati D, Ceriani M, Allievi J. 2006. Ground deformation monitoring by using the permanent scatterers technique: the example of the Oltrepo Pavese (Lombardia, Italy). Eng Geol. 88:240–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michele C, Erlinda B, Javier D, Josep C, Alain A. 2008. Generation of advanced ERS and envisat interferometric SAR products using the stable point network technique. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 74:443–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora O, Mallorqui JJ, Broquetas A. 2003. Linear and nonlinear terrain deformation maps from a reduced set of interferometric SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 41:2243–2253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouginot J, Scheuchl B, Rignot E. 2012. Mapping of ice motion in Antarctica using synthetic-aperture radar data. Remote Sens. 4:2753–2767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng AH. (2010). Advanced Satellite Radar Interferometry for Ground Surface Displacement Detection. School of Surveying & Information System. Sydney: University of New South Wales. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Qi-huan H, Xiu-feng H. 2008. Surface deformation investigated with sbas-dinsar approach based on prior knowledge. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XXXVII:99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Seigmund R, Bao M, Lehner S, Mayerle R. 2004. First demonstration of surface currents imaged. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 42:511–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Carrasco D, Blanco P. 2005. Advanced DINSAR based on coherent pixels: development and results using CPT technique. In: Agency ES, editor, Fringe ATSR workshop 2005: advances in SAR interferometry from ENVISAT and ERS missions. 2005 28 Nov–2 Dec; Frascati, Italy; Vol. 2005, p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen PA, Hensley S, Joughin IR, Li FK, Madsen SN, Rodríguez E, Goldstein RM. 2000. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. IEEE Proc. 88:333–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarikhi P. 2010. Radar DEM generation; achievements and benefits. Wordpress.com. [cited 2012 Dec 6]. Available from: http://parviztarikhi.wordpress.com
   Google Scholar
• Tarikhi P. 2011. November/December. InSAR New ganeration. Position Magazine, Australia. Issue 50, p. 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Tarikhi P. 2012. Liqui-InSAR; SAR Interferometry for aquatic bodies. Wordpress.com. Available from http://parviztarikhi.wordpress.com
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ge D, Hu Q, Guo X. 2008. Surface subsidence monitoring with coherent point target SAR interferometry. IEEE, IGARSS International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; 2008 Jul 6–11; Boston, MA; p. 1205–1208.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmüller U, Santoro M, Werner C, Strozzi T, Wiesmann A, Lengert W. 2009. DEM generation using ERS–ENVISAT interferometry. J Appl Geophys. 69:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner C, Wegmüller U, Strozzi T, Wiesmann A. 2003. Interferometric point target analysis for deformation mapping. IEEE, IGARSS International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium; 2003 Jul 21–25; Toulouse, France; p. 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Werner C, Strozzi T, Wiesmann A. 2005. ERS–ASAR integration in the interferometric point target analysis. Fringe ATSR Workshop 2005: Advances in SAR Interferometry from ENVISAT and ERS missions; 2005 28 Nov–2 Dec; Frascati, Italy; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar