Statistical data fusion of multi-sensor AOD over the Continental United States

References

• Anderson TL, Charlson RJ, Winker DM, Ogren JA, Holmen K. 2003. Mesoscale variations of tropospheric aerosols. J Atmos Sci. 60:119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey TC, Gatrell AC. 1995. Interactive spatial data analysis. Harlow Essex; New York: Longman Scientific & Technical; J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Gelfand AE, Finley AO, Sang H. 2008. Gaussian prediction process models for large spatial data sets. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 70:825–848.
   Google Scholar
• Berrocal VJ, Gelfand AE, Holland DM. 2010. A spatio-temporal downscaler for output from numerical models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 15:176–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer M, Hoek G, Smit HA, de Jongste JC, Gerritsen J, Postma DS, Kerkhof M, Brunekreef B. 2007. Air pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J. 29:879–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45:5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana R, Karampatziakis N, Yessenalina, A. 2008. An empirical evaluation of supervised learning in high dimensions. Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. Helsinki, Finland: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Michalak AM, Kahn RA, Paradise SR, Braverman AJ, Miller CE. 2010. A geostatistical data fusion technique for merging remote sensing and ground-based observations of aerosol optical thickness. J Geophys Res. 115:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressie NAC. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie N, Johannesson G. 2008. Fixed rank kriging for very large spatial data sets. J R Stat Soc Series B. 70:209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Darrow LA, Strickland MJ, Klein M, Waller LA, Flanders WD, Correa A, Marcus M, Tolbert PE. 2009. Seasonality of birth and implications for temporal studies of preterm birth. Epidemiology. 20:699–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobuvik O, Smirnov A, Holben B, King MD, Kaufman YJ, Eck TF, Slutsker I. 2000. Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 105:9791–9806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel-Cox JA, Holloman CH, Coutant BW, Hoff RM. 2004. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality. Atmos Environ. 38:2495–2509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes M, Raftery AE. 2005. Model evaluation and spatial interpolation by Bayesian combination of observations with outputs from numerical models. Biometrics. 61:36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman GT, Mulholland JA, Russell AG, Srivastava A, Strickland MI, Klein M, Waller LA, Tolbert PE, Edgerton ES. 2010. Ambient air pollutant measurement error: characterization and impacts in a time-series epidemiologic Study in Atlanta. Environ Sci Technol. 44:7692–7698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotway CA, Young LJ. 2002. Combining incompatible spatial data. J Am Stat Assoc. 97:632–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Patadia F, Christopher SA. 2008. Multisensor data product fusion for aerosol research. Geosci Remot Sens IEEE Trans. 46:1407–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiemstra PH, Pebesma EJ, Twenhofel CJW, Heuvelink GBM. 2009. Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network. Comput Geosci. 35:1711–1721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu ZY. 2009. Spatial analysis of MODIS aerosol optical depth, PM(2.5), and chronic coronary heart disease. Int J Health Geogr. 8:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu ZY, Rao KR. 2009. Particulate air pollution and chronic ischemic heart disease in the eastern United States: a county level ecological study using satellite aerosol data. Environ Health. 8:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison KD, Smith S, Faruqui SJ. 2005. Correlating MODIS aerosol optical thickness data with ground-based PM2.5 observations across Texas for use in a real-time air quality prediction system. Atmos Environ. 39:7190–7203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journel AG, Rossi ME. 1989. When do we need a trend model in kriging. Math Geol. 21:715–739.
   Google Scholar
• Jun M, Stein ML. 2008. Nonstationary covariance models For global data. Ann Appl Stat. 2:1271–1289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinne S. 2009. Remote sensing data combinations: superior global maps for aerosol optical depth. In: Kokhanovsky A, Leeuw G, editors. Satellite aerosol remote sensing over land. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp KR, Frouin R, Kondragunta S, Prados A. 2005. Toward aerosol optical depth retrievals over land from GOES visible radiances: determining surface reflectance. Int J Remote Sens. 26:4097–4116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondragunta S, Lee P, McQueen J, Kittaka C, Prados AI, Ciren P, Laszlo I, Pierce RB, Hoff R, Szykman JJ. 2008. Air quality forecast verification using satellite data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. 47:425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy RC, Remer LA, Martins JV, Kaufman YJ, Plana-Fattori A, Redemann J, Wenny B. 2005. Evaluation of the MODIS aerosol retrievals over ocean and land during CLAMS. J Atmos Sci. 62:974–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy RC, Remer LA, Vermote EF, Mattoo S, Kaufman YJ. 2007. Second-generation operational algorithm: retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer spectral reflectance. J Geophys Res Atmos. 112: Article number D13211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy RC, Remer LA, Kleidman RG, Mattoo S, Ichoku C, Kahn R, Eck TF. 2010. Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land. Atmos Chem Phys. 10:10399–10420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Franklin M, Kahn R, Koutrakis P. 2007. Using aerosol optical thickness to predict ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the St. Louis area: a comparison between MISR and MODIS. Remote Sens Environ. 107:33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Paciorek CJ, Koutrakis P. 2009. Estimating regional spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 concentrations using satellite data, meteorology, and land use information. Environ Health Perspect. 117:886–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Sarnat JA, Coull BA, Koutrakis P, Jacob DJ. 2004. Validation of Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) aerosol optical thickness measurements using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations over the contiguous United States. J Geophys Res. 109:D06205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger KB, Tolbert PE, Klein M, Peel JL, Flanders WD, Todd K, Mulholland JA, Ryan PB, Frumkin H. 2004. Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department visits. Epidemiology. 15:46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen H, Cressie N, Braverman A. 2012. Spatial statistical data fusion for remote sensing applications. J Am Stat Assoc. 107:1004–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Nirala M. 2008. Technical note - multi-sensor data fusion of aerosol optical thickness. Int J Remote Sens. 29:2127–2136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciorek CJ, Liu Y, Moreno-Macias H, Kondragunta S. 2008. Spatio-temporal associations between GOES aerosol optical depth retrievals and ground-level PM2.5. Environ Sci Technol. 42:5800–5806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma EJ. 2004. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput Geosci. 30:683–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebesma E, Cornford D, Dubois G, Heuvelink GBM, Hristopulos D, Pilz J, Stohlker U, Morin G, Skoien JO. 2011. INTAMAP: the design and implementation of an interoperable automated interpolation web service. Comput Geosci. 37:343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel JL, Metzger KB, Klein M, Flanders WD, Mulholland JA, Tolbert PE. 2007. Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular emergency department visits in potentially sensitive groups. Am J Epidemiol. 165:625–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope CA, Ezzati M, Dockery DW. 2009. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N Engl J Med. 360:376–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prados AI, Kondragunta S, Ciren P, Knapp KR. 2007. GOES aerosol/smoke product (GASP) over North America: Comparisons to AERONET and MODIS observations. J Geophys Res Atmos. 112: (Art. no. D15201).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remer LA, Kleidman RG, Levy RC, Kaufman YJ, Tanre D, Mattoo S, Martins JV, Ichoku C, Koren I, Yu HB, Holben BN. 2007. GOES aerosol/smoke product (GASP) over North America: Comparisons to AERONET and MODIS observations. J Geophys Res Atmos. 112: Art. No. D15201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein ML. 1988. Asymptotically efficient prediction of a random field with a misspecified covariance function. Ann Stat. 16:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland M, Darrow L, Mulholland J, Klein M, Flanders WD, Winquist A, Tolbert P. 2011. Implications of different approaches for characterizing ambient air pollutant concentrations within the urban airshed for time-series studies and health benefits analyses. Environ Health. 10:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikle CK, Berliner LM. 2005. Combining information across spatial scales. Technometrics. 47:80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikle CK, Nychka D, Royle J. 2002. Multiresolution models for nonstationary spatial covariance functions. Stat Model. 2:315–331.
   Google Scholar
• Xu QF, Obradovic Z, Han B, Li Y, Braverman A, Vucetic S, IEEE. 2005. Improving aerosol retrieval accuracy by integrating AERONET, MISR and MODIS data. New York: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zubko V, Leptoukh GG, Gopalan A. 2010. Study of data-merging and interpolation methods for use in an interactive online analysis system: MODIS terra and aqua daily aerosol case. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 48:4219–4235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar