Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible areas using frequency ratio and maximum entropy models

References

• Abdideh M, Qorashi M, Rangzan M, Aryan M. 2011. Assessment of relative active tectonics using morphometric analysis, case study of Dez River (Southwestern, Iran). Scientific Quarterly J, Geoscinces. 80:33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadisharaf E, Kalyanapu AJ, Chung ES. 2016a. Spatial probabilistic multi-criteria decision making for assessment of flood management alternatives. J Hydrol. 533:365–378.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadisharaf E, Tajrishy M, Alamdari N. 2016b. Integrating flood hazard into site selection of detention basins using spatial multi-criteria decision-making. J Environ Plann Manag. 59:1397–1417.10.1080/09640568.2015.1077104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aniya M. 1985. Landslide-susceptibility mapping in the Amahata river basin, Japan. ANN Assoc Am Geogr. 75:102–114.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1985.tb00061.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter GF. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists-modeling with GIS computer methods in the geoscientists. Oxford: Pergamon. 13:398.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley AP. 1997. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn. 30:1145–1159.10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolo M, Soldati A, Andreussi P. 2003. Artificial neural network approach to flood forecasting in the River Arno. Hydrol Sci J. 48:381–398.10.1623/hysj.48.3.381.45286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V. 2013. Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 13:2815–2831.10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convertino M, Troccoli A, Catani F. 2013. Detecting fingerprints of landslide drivers: a MaxEnt model. Geophys Res Lett: Earth Surface. 118:1367–1386.10.1002/jgrf.20099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JD, Sims SM. 2013. Physical and maximum entropy models applied to inventories of hillslope sediment sources. J Soil Sediment. 13:1784–1801.10.1007/s11368-013-0774-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoodi Moghaddam D, Rezaei M, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghie ZS, Pradhan B. 2015. Groundwater spring potential mapping using bivariate statistical model and GIS in the Taleghan Watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci. 8:913–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 65:135–165.10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felicísimo Á, Cuartero A, Remondo J, Quirós E. 2013. Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides. 10:175–189.10.1007/s10346-012-0320-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Hong W. 2009. On the principle of maximum entropy and the risk analysis of disaster loss. Appl Math Model. 33:2934–2938.10.1016/j.apm.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández DS, Lutz MA. 2010. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol. 111:90–98.10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadiyani MO. 2006. The role of land use change on regional flood (Case study: Madarsoo watershed). J Environ Studies. 42:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Xu C, Bui DT. 2015. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena. 133:266–281.10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS. 2016a. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China): a comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Geomorphology. 259:105–118.10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Bui DT, Xu C, Youssef AM, Chen W. 2016b. Comparison of four kernel functions used in support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Suichuan area (China). Nat Hazard Risk: Geomatics; p. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Bui DT, Xu C, Akgun A. 2016c. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Luxi area (China) using support vector machines. Environ Earth Sci. 75:1515.10.1007/s12665-015-4866-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D. 2017. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int. 32:139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Najafi A, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaeian J, Sattarian A. 2014. GIS-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 11:909–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanapu AJ, Judi DR, McPherson TN, Burian SJ. 2012. Monte Carlo-based flood modelling framework for estimating probability weighted flood risk. J Flood Risk Manage. 5:37–48.10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01123.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR. 2016. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. 83:947–987.10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia MB, Pirasteh S, Pradhan B, Mahmud AR, Sulaiman WNA, Moradi A. 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 67:251–264.10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP. 2012. Flood management and a GIS modeling method to assess flood hazard areas – a case study. Hydrol Sci J. 56:212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MJ, Kang JE, Jeon S. 2012, July. Application of frequency ratio model and validation for predictive flooded area susceptibility mapping using GIS. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS 2012 IEEE International IEEE; p. 895–898.doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6351414.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, De Smedt F. 2005. Flood modeling for complex terrain using GIS and remote sensed information. Water Resour Manag. 19:605–624.10.1007/s11269-005-6808-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manandhar B, Balla MK, Awal R, Pradhan BM. 2010. Floodplain analysis and risk assessment of lothar khola (stream) [MSc Thesis]. Phokara: Tribhuvan University. p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci. 61:221–236.10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Rezaei A. 2015. Groundwater qanat potential mapping using frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models in the Moghan watershed, Iran. Earth Sci Inform. 8:171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh HJ, Kim YS, Choi JK, Park E, Lee S. 2011. GIS mapping of regional probabilistic groundwater potential in the area of Pohang City, Korea. J Hydrol. 399:158–172.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A, Altural T. 2013. A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 64:180–197.10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou G, Vasiliades L, Loukas A. 2015. Multi-criteria analysis framework for potential flood prone areas mapping. Water Resour Manage. 29:399–418.10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park NW. 2015. Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple geoenvironmental data sets. Environ Earth Sci. 73:937–949.10.1007/s12665-014-3442-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips S, Anderson JRP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 190:231–259.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Moezzi KD. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multi criteria evaluation model at Haraz Watershed, Iran. In Terrigenous Mass Movements. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg; p. 23–49. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25495-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Moezzi KD. 2013a. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster–Shafer and Weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomatics, Nat Hazard. 4:93–118.10.1080/19475705.2012.662915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR. 2013b. Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Sci Eng. 6:2351–2365.
   Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C. 2013c. Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran. J Earth Syst Sci. 122:349–369.10.1007/s12040-013-0282-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Aghda SMF. 2013d. Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazard. 69:749–779.10.1007/s11069-013-0728-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2010. Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spat Sci Hydrol. 9:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H. 2016a. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto Int. 31:42–70.10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Zeinivand H, Besharat M. 2016b. Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomatics, Nat Hazard Risk. 7:1000–1017.10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR. 2017. Identification of Critical Flood Prone Areas in Data-Scarce and Ungauged Regions: A Comparison of Three Data Mining Models. Water Resour Manag. 31:1473–1487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A. 2013. Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Sci Eng. 7:725–742.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal J, Lu XX. 2004. Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon asia: a review. Nat Hazards. 33:283–301.10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000037035.65105.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafapour Tehrany M, Lee MJ, Pradhan B, Neamah Jebur M. 2013. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. J Hydrol. 504:69–79.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafapour Tehrany M, Lee MJ, Pradhan B, Neamah Jebur M. 2014a. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Environ Earth Sci. 512:332–343.
   Google Scholar
• Shafapour Tehrany M, Lee MJ, Pradhan B, Neamah Jebur M, Lee S. 2014b. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafapour Tehrany M, Pradhan B, Neamah Jebur M. 2015a. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Env Res Risk A. 29:1149–1165.10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafapour Tehrany M, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Ahmad N. 2015b. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena. 125:91–101.10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilodimou H, Livaditis G, Bathrellos G, Verikiou-Papaspiridakou E. 2003. Investigating the flooding events of the urban regions of Glyfada and Voula, Attica, Greece: a contribution to urban geomorphology. Geogr Ann. 85:197–204.10.1111/geoa.2003.85.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Swets JA. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 240:1285–1293.10.1126/science.3287615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B. 2012. How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides? Ecol Modell. 239:27–39.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter SD. 2002. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med. 21:1237–1256.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz I, Keskin I. 2009. GIS based statistical and physical approaches to landslide susceptibility mapping (Sebinkarahisar, Turkey). B Eng Geol Environ. 68:459–471.10.1007/s10064-009-0188-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare Garizi A, Brady Sheikh V, Saad Eddin A, Salman Mahini A. 2012. Applications logistic regression modeling to change the spatial pattern of vegetation (Case Study: Watershed Chehelchay Golestan Province). Geog Space. 37:55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Sci Eng. 6:2873–2888.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Wang D, Wu J. 2012. Sensitivity analysis of the probability distribution of groundwater level series based on information entropy. Stoch Env Res Risk A. 26:345–356.10.1007/s00477-012-0556-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar