Landslide susceptibility assessment using three bivariate models considering the new topo-hydrological factor: HAND

References

• Akgun A. 2012. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at İzmir, Turkey. Landslides. 9(1):93–106.10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhasawneh MS, Ngah UK, Tay LT, Isa NAM. 2014. Determination of importance for comprehensive topographic factors on landslide hazard mapping using artificial neural network. Environ Earth Sci. 72:787–799.10.1007/s12665-013-3003-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbalagan R, Chakraborty D, Kohli A. 2008. Landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) mapping on meso–scale for systematic town planning in mountainous terrain. J Sci Ind Res. 67:486–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antronico L, Borrelli L, Coscarelli R, Gullà G. 2015. Time evolution of landslide damages to buildings: the case study of Lungro (Calabria, southern Italy). Bull Eng Geol Environ. 74:47–59.10.1007/s10064-014-0591-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahremand A. 2016. HESS opinions: advocating process modeling and de–emphasizing parameter estimation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 20:1433–1445.10.5194/hess-20-1433-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahremand A, Kornejady A. 2015. Introduction and preparation of the new topo–hydrological index: height Above the Nearest Drainage, in the Ziarat watershed. Water Engineering Conference and Exhibition, Iran. (In Persian). 9 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Blahut J, van Westen CJ, Sterlacchini S. 2010. Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris–flow source areas. Geomorphology. 119:36–51.10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter GF. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Comput Methamphetamine Geos, Pergamon, New York. 13:398 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF. 1988. Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia. Digital Geol Geog Inf Syst. 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P. 2008. Comparing models of debris–flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology. 94:353–378.10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champatiray P. 2000. Operationalization of cost–effective methodology for landslide hazard zonation using RS and GIS: IIRS initiative. Natural Disasters and their mitigation; Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System Perspectives. Dehradun, India: Indian Institute of Remote Sensing; p. 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Zhao Z. 2016. A GIS–based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 32:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung CJ. 2006. Using likelihood ratio functions for modeling the conditional probability of occurrence of future landslides for risk assessment. Comput Geosci. 32:1052–1068.10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung CJF, Fabbri AG. 1999. Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 65:1389–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CONRWMGP] Central Office of Natural Resources and Watershed Management in Golestan Province. 2009. Detailed action plan of Ziarat Watershed. Iran: Pazhouhab Sharq Consulting Engineers
   Google Scholar
• Constantin M, Bednarik M, Jurchescu MC, Vlaicu M. 2011. Landslide susceptibility assessment using the bivariate statistical analysis and the index of entropy in the Sibiciu Basin (Romania). Environ Earth Sci. 63:397–406.10.1007/s12665-010-0724-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convertino M, Troccoli A, Catani F. 2013. Detecting fingerprints of landslide drivers: a MaxEnt model. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. 118:1367–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruden DM. 1991. A simple definition of a landslide. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 43:27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cuartas LA, Tomasella J, Nobre AD, Nobre CA, Hodnett MG, Waterloo MJ, Oliveira SM, Randow RD, Trancoso R, Ferreira M. 2012. Distributed hydrological modeling of a micro–scale rainforest watershed in Amazonia: Model evaluation and advances in calibration using the new HAND terrain model. J Hydrol. 462–463:15–27.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui K, Lu D, Li W. 2016. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping based on statistical index, certainty factors, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models. Geocarto Int. 2:1–21.10.1080/10106049.2016.1195886
   Google Scholar
• Devkota KC, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF. 2013. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards. 65:135–165.10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimri S, Lakhera RC, Sati S. 2007. Fuzzy–based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides. 4:101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Q, Chen W, Hong H. 2017. Application of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 32:619–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati L, Turrini MC. 2002. An objective method to rank the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Eng Geol. 63:277–289.10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00087-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas GB, McIvor IR, Manderson AK, Koolaard JP, Todd M, Braaksma S, Gray RAJ. 2013. Reducing shallow landslide occurrence in pastoral hill country using wide‐spaced trees. Land Degrad Dev. 24:103–114.10.1002/ldr.v24.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity Distrib. 17:43–57.10.1111/ddi.2010.17.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmahdy SI, Marghany MM, Mohamed MM. 2016. Application of a weighted spatial probability model in GIS to analyse landslides in Penang Island, Malaysia. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 7:345–359.10.1080/19475705.2014.904825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C. 2002. Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide–prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol. 41:720–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharari S, Hrachowitz M, Fenicia F, Savenije HHG. 2011. Hydrological landscape classification: investigating the performance of HAND based landscape classifications in a central European meso–scale catchment. Hydrol Earth Sys Sci. 15:3275–3291.10.5194/hess-15-3275-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire M. 2011. Landslide occurrence and its relation with terrain factors in the Siwalik Hills, Nepal: case study of susceptibility assessment in three basins. Nat Hazards. 56(1):299–320.10.1007/s11069-010-9569-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Van Westen CJ, Carranza EJM, Ghoshal TB, Sarkar NK, Surendranath M. 2009. A quantitative approach for improving the BIS (Indian) method of medium–scale landslide susceptibility. J Geol Soc India. 74:625–638.10.1007/s12594-009-0167-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glade T, Anderson M, Crozier MJ, editors. 2005. Landslide hazard and risk. New York: Wiley; p. 824.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami R, Mitchell NC, Brocklehurst SH. 2011. Distribution and causes of landslides in the eastern Peloritani of NE sicily and western Aspromonte of SW Calabria, Italy. Geomorphology. 132:111–122.10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GSDI] Geological Survey Department of Iran. 1997. Available from: http://www.gsi.ir/Main/Lang_en/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Gupta RP, Joshi BC. 1990. Landslide hazard zoning using the GIS approach – a case study from the Ramganga catchment, Himalayas. Eng Geol. 28:119–131.10.1016/0013-7952(90)90037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Aleotti P, Malamud BD, Turcotte DL. 2002. Comparison of three landslide event inventories in central and northern Italy. Proceedings of the 4th EGS Plinius Conference, Mallorca, Spain, October.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F. 2005. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the watershed scale. Geomorphology. 72:272–299.10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havenith HB, Torgoev I, Meleshko A, Alioshin Y, Torgoev A, Danneels G. 2006. Landslides in the Mailuu-Suu Valley, Kyrgyzstan – hazards and impact. Landslides. 3:137–147.10.1007/s10346-006-0035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckerman D. 1986. Probabilistic interpretation of MYCIN’s certainty factors. In: Kanal LN, Lemmer JF, editors. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. New York (NY): Elsevier; p. 298–311.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe E, Anderson M. 2010. Tackling landslide risk: helping land use policy to reflect unplanned housing realities in the Eastern Caribbean. Land Use Policy. 27:798–800.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS. 2016a. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China): a comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Geomorphology. 259:105–118.10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D, Xu C, Youssef AM, Chen W. 2016b. Comparison of four kernel functions used in support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Suichuan area (China). Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk. 2014: 1–26.10.1080/19475705.2016.1250112
   Google Scholar
• Hong H, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Tien Bui D, Xu C, Akgun A. 2016c. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Luxi area (China) using support vector machines. Environ Earth Sci. 75:40.10.1007/s12665-015-4866-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H, Chen W, Xu C, Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D. 2017. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the Chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy. Geocarto Int. 32:139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussin HY, Zumpano V, Reichenbach P, Sterlacchini S, Micu M, van Westen CJ, Bălteanu D. 2016. Different landslide sampling strategies in a grid-based bi-variate statistical susceptibility model. Geomorphology. 253:508–523.10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IDNRM] Iranian Department of Natural Resources Management. 2002. Principles of watershed management and Land use planning. 245 p. http://www.frw.org.ir/00/Fa/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jaafari A, Najafi A, Pourghasemi HR, Rezaeian J, Sattarian A. 2014. GIS–based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Caspian forest, northern Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 11(4):909–926.10.1007/s13762-013-0464-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob M. 2000. The impacts of logging on landslide activity at Clayoquot Sound, British Columbia. Catena. 38:279–300.10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00078-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaynes E. 1982. On the rationale of maximum–entropy methods. Proc IEEE. 70:939–952.10.1109/PROC.1982.12425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Shafri HZM, Yusof Z, Tehrany MS. 2014. An integrated user–friendly ArcMap tool for bivariate statistical modeling in geoscience applications. Geosci Model Dev Discuss. 7:7239–7265.10.5194/gmdd-7-7239-2014
   Google Scholar
• Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Tehrany MS. 2014. Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high–resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sens Environ. 152:150–165.10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenness J. 2013. DEM surface tools for ArcGIS. Jenness Enterprises. [Cited March]. Available from: http://www.jennessent.com/arcgis/surface_area.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kannan M, Saranathan E, Anbalagan R. 2011. Macro Landslide hazard zonation mapping-case study from bodi-bodimettu Ghats section, Theni District, Tamil Nadu-India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 39:485–496.10.1007/s12524-011-0112-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanungo DP, Sarkar S, Sharma S. 2011. Combining neural network with fuzzy, certainty factor and likelihood ratio concepts for spatial prediction of landslides. Nat Hazards. 59:1491–1512.10.1007/s11069-011-9847-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaledian Y, Kiani F, Ebrahimi S, Brevik EC, Aitkenhead-Peterson J. 2016. Assessment and monitoring of soil degradation during land use change using multivariate analysis. Land Degrad Dev. 28:128–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HG, Lee DK, Park C, Kil S, Son Y, Park JH. 2015. Evaluating landslide hazards using RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Environ Earth Sci. 73:1385–1400.10.1007/s12665-014-3775-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleidon A, Malhi Y, Cox PM. 2010. Maximum entropy production in environmental and ecological systems. Philos Trans R Soci B. 365:1297–1302.10.1098/rstb.2010.0018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornejady A, Heidari K, Nakhavali M. 2015. Assessment of landslide susceptibility, semi–quantitative risk and management in the Ilam dam watershed, Ilam, Iran. Environ Res Res. 3:85–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kornejady A, Heidary K, Sarparast M, Khosravi G, Mombeini M. 2014. Performance assessment of Two “LNRF” and “AHP–Area Density” models in landslide susceptibility Zonation. J Life Sci Biomed. 4:169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Bahremand A. 2017. Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. Catena. 152:144–162.10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. 2005. Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens. 26:1477–1491.10.1080/01431160412331331012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. 2013. Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping in the Sagimakri area, Korea using KOMPSAT–1 and weight of evidence technique. Environ Earth Sci. 70:3197–3215.10.1007/s12665-013-2385-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Pradhan B. 2006. Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia. J Earth Syst Sci. 115:661–672.10.1007/s12040-006-0004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Pradhan B. 2007. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides. 4:33–41.10.1007/s10346-006-0047-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Ryu JH, Kim IS. 2007. Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides. 4:327–338.10.1007/s10346-007-0088-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Chen YN, Ouyang H. 2002. Analysis on sand disaster with disaster entropy method. Arid Land Geogr. 25:350–353.
   Google Scholar
• Liu JP, Zeng ZP, Liu HQ, Wang HB. 2011. A rough set approach to analyze factors affecting landslide incidence. Comput Geosci. 37:1311–1317.10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanović M, Kovačević M, Bajat B, Voženílek V. 2011. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Eng Geol. 123:225–234.10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martha TR, van Westen CJ, Kerle N, Jetten V, Kumar KV. 2013. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi–automatically created landslide inventories. Geomorphology. 184:139–150.10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi A, Heshmatpoor A, Mosaedi A. 2004. Study on Efficiency of an Iranian Method for Landslide Hazard Zonation in Golestan Province. Nice: EGU– 1st General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights–of–evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci. 61:221–236.10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mon DL, Cheng CH, Lin JC. 1994. Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 62:127–134.10.1016/0165-0114(94)90052-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motamedi M, Liang RY. 2014. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment using Copula modeling technique. Landslides. 11:565–573.10.1007/s10346-013-0399-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Rezaei A. 2015. Groundwater qanat potential mapping using frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models in the Moghan watershed, Iran. Earth Sci Inf. 8:171–186.10.1007/s12145-014-0145-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naithani AK. 2007. Macro landslide hazard zonation mapping using univariate statistical analysis in a part of Garhwal Himalaya. Geol Soc India. 70:353–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S. 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology. 94:401–418.10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B. 2007. Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights–of–evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW–Germany). Geomorphology. 86:12–24.10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieves V, Wang J, Bras RL. 2011. Statistics of multifractal processes using the maximum entropy method. Geophys Res Lett. 38:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre AD, Cuartas LA, Hodnett M, Rennó CD, Rodrigues G, Silveira A, Waterloo M, Saleska S. 2011. Height above the nearest drainage–a hydrologically relevant new terrain model. J Hydrol. 404:13–29.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh HJ, Lee S. 2010. Assessment of ground subsidence using GIS and the weights–of–evidence model. Eng Geol. 115:36–48.10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlmacher GC. 2007. Plan curvature and landslide probability in regions dominated by earth flows and earth slides. Eng Geol. 91:117–134.10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownegh M. 2002. Landslide hazard and risk assessment in the southern Suburbs of Newcastle. Sabbatical research report No. 2, University of Newcastle, Australia; 85 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ownegh M. 2004. Assessing the applicability of the Australian landslide databases in hazard management. Proceedings of ISCO, Brisbane; July 4–8; Australia; p. 1001–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir A, Altural T. 2013. A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci. 64:180–197.10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardeshi SD, Autade SE, Pardeshi SS. 2013. Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques. Springer Plus. 2:523.10.1186/2193-1801-2-523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park NW. 2015. Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple geoenvironmental data sets. Environ Earth Sci. 73(3):937–949.10.1007/s12665-014-3442-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Pradhan B, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2016a. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India). Environ Model Software. 84:240–250.10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Dholakia MB, Prakash I, Pham HV, Mehmood K, Le HQ. 2016b. A novel ensemble classifier of rotation forest and Naïve Bayer for landslide susceptibility assessment at the Luc Yen district, Yen Bai Province (Viet Nam) using GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 120:1–23.10.1080/19475705.2016.1255667
   Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Dholakia MB, Prakash I, Pham HV. 2016c. A comparative study of least square support vector machines and multiclass alternating decision trees for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides in a tropical cyclones area. Geotech Geol Eng. 34:1807–1824.10.1007/s10706-016-9990-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Pham HV, Le HQ, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2016d. Landslide hazard assessment using random subspace fuzzy rules based classifier ensemble and probability analysis of rainfall data: a case study at Mu Cang Chai District, Yen Bai Province (Viet Nam). J Indian Soc Remote Sens: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Dholakia MB. 2017a. Hybrid integration of multilayer perceptron neural networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS. Catena. 149:52–63.10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT, Tien Bui D, Prakash I, Nguyen LH, Dholakia MB. 2017b. A comparative study of sequential minimal optimization-based support vector machines, vote feature intervals, and logistic regression in landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS. Environ Earth Sci. 76:371.10.1007/s12665-017-6689-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 190:231–259.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Dudík M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 31:161–175.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piacentini D, Troiani F, Soldati M, Notarnicola C, Savelli D, Schneiderbauer S, Strada C. 2012. Statistical analysis for assessing shallow–landslide susceptibility in South Tyrol (south–eastern Alps, Italy). Geomorphology. 151:196–206.10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N. 2016. Random forests and evidential belief function–based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 75:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Watershed, Iran. Catena. 97:71–84.10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi HR, Rossi M. 2016. Landslide susceptibility modeling in a landslide prone area in Mazandarn Province, North of Iran: a comparison between GLM, GAM, MARS, and M-AHP methods. Theor Appl Climatol: 1–25. doi:10.1007/s00704-016-1919-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi H, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Moezzi KD. 2013. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster–Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk. 4:93–118.10.1080/19475705.2012.662915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365.10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2009. Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. Int J Phys Sci. 3:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2010a. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Software. 25:747–759.10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Lee S. 2010b. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back–propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides. 7(1):13–30.10.1007/s10346-009-0183-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi S, Xu Q, Lan H, Zhang B, Liu J. 2010. Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by 2008.5. 12 Wenchuan Earthquake, China. Eng Geol. 116:95–108.10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O, Haghizadeh A, Pourghasemi HR, Noormohamadi F. 2016. Gully erosion susceptibility mapping: the role of GIS–based bivariate statistical models and their comparison. Nat Hazards. 82:1231–1258.10.1007/s11069-016-2239-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren LC. 2000. Disaster entropy: conception and application. J Nat Disasters. 9:26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rennó CD, Nobre AD, Cuartas LA, Soares JV, Hodnett MG, Tomasella J, Waterloo MJ. 2008. HAND, a new terrain descriptor using SRTM–DEM: Mapping terra–firme rainforest environments in Amazonia. Remote Sens Environ. 112:3469–3481.10.1016/j.rse.2008.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savenije HHG. 2010. HESS opinions “Topography driven conceptual modelling (FLEX–Topo)”. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 14:2681–2692.10.5194/hess-14-2681-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schicker R, Moon V. 2012. Comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale. Geomorphology. 161:40–57.10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt E. 2010. Weights of evidence mineral prospectivity modeling with ArcGIS. In EOSC 448 – Directed Studies. Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Studies, University of British Columbia Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bull Syst Tech J. 27:379–423.10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma LP, Patel N, Ghose MK, Debnath P. 2015. Development and application of Shannon’s entropy integrated information value model for landslide susceptibility assessment and zonation in Sikkim Himalayas in India. Nat Hazards. 75:1555–1576.10.1007/s11069-014-1378-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirzadi A, Tien Bui D, Pham BT, Solaimani K, Chapi K, Kavian A, Shahabi H, Revhaug I. 2017. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Environ Earth Sci. 76:60.10.1007/s12665-016-6374-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh CD, Behera KK, Rocky WS. 2011. Landslide susceptibility along NH–39 between Karong and Mao, Senapati district, Manipur. J Geol Soc India. 78:559–570.10.1007/s12594-011-0120-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song KY, Oh HJ, Choi J, Park I, Lee C, Lee S. 2012. Prediction of landslides using ASTER imagery and data-mining models. Adv Space Res. 49:978–993.10.1016/j.asr.2011.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterlacchini S, Ballabio C, Blahut J, Masetti M, Sorichetta A. 2011. Spatial agreement of predicted patterns in landslide susceptibility maps. Geomorphology. 125:51–61.10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujatha ER, Rajamanickam GV, Kumaravel P. 2012. Landslide susceptibility analysis using Probabilistic Certainty Factor Approach: A case study on Tevankarai stream watershed, India. J Earth Syst Sci. 121:1337–1350.10.1007/s12040-012-0230-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumaryono DM, Sulaksana N, Dasa Triana Y. 2014. Weights of Evidence Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Tandikek and Damar Bancah, West Sumatra, Indonesia. IJSR.NET. 4:1283–1290.
   Google Scholar
• Süzen ML, Doyuran V. 2004. A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol. 45:665–679.10.1007/s00254-003-0917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Ho TC, Pradhan B, Pham BT, Nhu VH, Revhaug I. 2016. GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks. Environ Earth Sci. 75(14):1101.10.1007/s12665-016-5919-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB. 2012a. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena. 96:28–40.10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB. 2012b. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology. 171:12–29.10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I. 2016. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides. 13(2):361–378.10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos P, Benardos A. 2014. Estimating landslide susceptibility through a artificial neural network classifier. Nat Hazards. 74:1489–1516.10.1007/s11069-014-1245-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsangaratos P, Ilia I, Hong H, Chen W, Xu C. 2016. Applying Information Theory and GIS–based quantitative methods to produce landslide susceptibility maps in Nancheng County, China. Landslides. 14:1091–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Westen CJ. 2002. Use of weights of evidence modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping. Enschede: International Institute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation.
   Google Scholar
• Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R. 2003. Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards. 30:399–419.10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007097.42735.9e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R. 2006. Landslide hazard and risk zonation – why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ. 65:167–184.10.1007/s10064-005-0023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JS, Blaschke T. 2008. Object‐based land‐cover classification for the Phoenix metropolitan area: optimization vs. transportability. Int J Remote Sens. 29:2021–2040.10.1080/01431160701408337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen BP, He L. 2012. Influence of lixiviation by irrigation water on residual shear strength of weathered red mudstone in Northwest China: implication for its role in landslides’ reactivation. Eng Geol. 151:56–63.10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Qiao J, Zhang X. 2010. Regional Landslide Zonation based on Entropy Method in Three Gorges Area, China. 2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2010); p. 1336–1339.
   Google Scholar
• Yang ZH, Lan HX, Gao X, Li LP, Meng YS, Wu YM. 2015. Urgent landslide susceptibility assessment in the 2013 Lushan earthquake–impacted area, Sichuan Province, China. Nat Hazards. 75:2467–2487.10.1007/s11069-014-1441-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi CX, Shi PJ. 1994. Entropy production and natural hazard. J Beijing Normal Univ. 30:276–280.
   Google Scholar
• Yufeng S, Fengxiang J. 2009. Landslide stability analysis based on generalized information entropy. In Environmental Science and Information Application Technology. ESIAT 2009. International Conference on, IEEE. 2:83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen LW, Thorne CR. 1987. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surf Processes Landforms. 12:47–56.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar