Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and BAT algorithms (BA)

References

• Ahmadlou M , Delavar M , Tayyebi A , Shafizadeh-Moghadam H . 2015. Using multivariate adaptive regression spline and artificial neural network to simulate urbanization in Mumbai, India. Int Arch Photogrammetry Remote Sens Spatial Info Sci. 40(1):31.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W5-31-2015
   Google Scholar
• Alihodzic A , Tuba M . 2014. Improved hybridized bat algorithm for global numerical optimization. Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim). UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ardalan A , Naieni KH , Kabir M-J , Zanganeh A-M , Keshtkar A-A , Honarvar M-R , Khodaie H , Osooli M . 2009. Evaluation of Golestan province’s early warning system for flash floods, Iran, 2006–7. Int J Biometeorol. 53(3):247–254.10.1007/s00484-009-0210-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barredo JI . 2009. Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970–2006. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 9(1):97–104.10.5194/nhess-9-97-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basse RM , Omrani H , Charif O , Gerber P , Bódis K . 2014. Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: Cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Appl Geogr. 53:160–171.10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Vogt Á , Haala N , Schanze J . 2015. Building parameters extraction from remote-sensing data and GIS analysis for the derivation of a building taxonomy of settlements–a contribution to flood building susceptibility assessment. Int J Image Data Fusion. 6(1):22–41.10.1080/19479832.2014.926296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody S , Blessing R , Sebastian A , Bedient P . 2014. Examining the impact of land use/land cover characteristics on flood losses. J Environ Planning Manage. 57(8):1252–1265.10.1080/09640568.2013.802228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT , Pradhan B , Nampak H , Bui Q-T , Tran Q-A , Nguyen Q-P . 2016. Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS. J Hydrol. 540:317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui DT , Tuan TA , Klempe H , Pradhan B , Revhaug I . 2016. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides. 13(2):361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burzel A , Dassanayake D , Oumeraci H . 2012. Spatial modelling of tangible and intangible losses in integrated risk analysisiresults of the XtremRisK project. Compr Flood Risk Manage. 143.
   Google Scholar
• Burzel A , Dassanayake DR , Oumeraci H . 2015. Spatial modeling of tangible and intangible losses in integrated coastal flood risk analysis. Coastal Eng J. 57(01):1540008.
   Google Scholar
• Chapi K , Singh VP , Shirzadi A , Shahabi H , Bui DT , Pham BT , Khosravi K . 2017. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environ Model Softw. 95:229–245.10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshmandi M , Amiri H , Vahedi M , Farshi M , Saghafi A , Zigheymat F . 2010. Assessing the level of preparedness for confronting crisis such as flood, earthquake, fire and storm in some selected hospitals of Iran. Military Med J. 12(3):167–171.
   Google Scholar
• Garg V , Deep K . 2017. Constrained Laplacian biogeography-based optimization algorithm. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage. 8(2):867–885.10.1007/s13198-016-0539-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golestan province meteorological information report . 2007. Gorgan: Golstan Regional Water company.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez H , Kavzoglu T . 2005. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin. Eng Geol. 78(1–2):11–27.10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadidi A . 2015. A robust approach for optimal design of plate fin heat exchangers using biogeography based optimization (BBO) algorithm. Appl Energy. 150:196–210.10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H , Panahi M , Shirzadi A , Ma T , Liu J , Zhu AX , Chen W , Kougias I , Kazakis N . 2017. Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Sci Total Environ. 621: 1124–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H , Tsangaratos P , Ilia I , Liu J , Zhu A-X , Chen W . 2018. Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County. Sci Total Environ. 625:575–588.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyder A , Iqbal N . 2016. Socio-economic losses of flood and household’s coping strategies: evidence from flood prone district of Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Jang J-S . 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 23(3):665–685.10.1109/21.256541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K , Nohani E , Maroufinia E , Pourghasemi HR . 2016. A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards. 83(2):947–987.10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K , Pham BT , Chapi K , Shirzadi A , Shahabi H , Revhaug I , Prakash I , Bui DT . 2018. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Sci Total Environ. 627:744–755.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi K , Pourghasemi HR , Chapi K , Bahri M . 2016. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess. 188(12):656.10.1007/s10661-016-5665-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kia MB , Pirasteh S , Pradhan B , Mahmud AR , Sulaiman WNA , Moradi A . 2012. An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin. Environ Earth Sci. 67(1):251–264.10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamdani EH , Assilian S . 1975. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man Mach Stud. 7(1):1–13.10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
   Google Scholar
• Mansouri B , Salehi J , Etebari B , Moghaddam HK . 2012. Metal concentrations in the groundwater in Birjand flood plain. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 89(1):138–142.10.1007/s00128-012-0630-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak PC , Sudheer K , Rangan D , Ramasastri K . 2004. A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J Hydrol. 291(1–2):52–66.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak P , Sudheer K , Rangan D , Ramasastri K . 2005. Short-term flood forecasting with a Neurofuzzy model. Water Resour Res. 41(4): 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefeslioglu H , Gokceoglu C , Sonmez H . 2008. An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol. 97(3–4):171–191.10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorollahi Y , Jokar MA , Kalhor A . 2016. Using artificial neural networks for temporal and spatial wind speed forecasting in Iran. Energy Convers Manage. 115:17–25.10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourani V , Mano A . 2007. Semi-distributed flood runoff model at the subcontinental scale for southwestern Iran. Hydrol Process. 21(23):3173–3180.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham BT , Bui DT , Prakash I , Dholakia M . 2016. Rotation forest fuzzy rule-based classifier ensemble for spatial prediction of landslides using GIS. Nat Hazards. 83(1):97–127.10.1007/s11069-016-2304-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiang Y , Lam NS . 2015. Modeling land use and land cover changes in a vulnerable coastal region using artificial neural networks and cellular automata. Environ Monit Assess. 187(3):57.10.1007/s10661-015-4298-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O , Haghizadeh A , Stefanidis S . 2016. Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based analytical hierarchy process for watershed prioritization; Gorganrood River Basin. Water Resour Manage. 30(3):1131–1150.10.1007/s11269-015-1215-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O , Pourghasemi HR . 2017. Identification of critical flood prone areas in data-scarce and ungauged regions: a comparison of three data mining models. Water Resour Manage. 31(5):1473–1487.10.1007/s11269-017-1589-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O , Pourghasemi HR , Zeinivand H . 2016. Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan province. Geocarto Int. 31(1):42–70.10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O , Samani AN , Mahdavi M , Pourghasemi HR , Zeinivand H . 2015. Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS. Arab J Geosci. 8(9):7059–7071.10.1007/s12517-014-1668-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati O , Zeinivand H , Besharat M . 2016. Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. 7(3):1000–1017.10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos C , Reis E . 2002. Floods in southern Portugal: their physical and human causes, impacts and human response. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change. 7(3):267–284.10.1023/A:1024475529524
   Google Scholar
• Roughani M , Ghafouri M , Tabatabaei M . 2007. An innovative methodology for the prioritization of sub-catchments for flood control. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 9(1):79–87.10.1016/j.jag.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghafian B , Farazjoo H , Bozorgy B , Yazdandoost F . 2008. Flood intensification due to changes in land use. Water Resour Manage. 22(8):1051–1067.10.1007/s11269-007-9210-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandink D , Kovacs P , Oulahen G , Shrubsole D . 2016. Public relief and insurance for residential flood losses in Canada: current status and commentary. Can Water Res J Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 41(1–2):220–237.10.1080/07011784.2015.1040458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh-Moghadam H , Tayyebi A , Ahmadlou M , Delavar MR , Hasanlou M . 2017. Integration of genetic algorithm and multiple kernel support vector regression for modeling urban growth. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 65:28–40.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirzadi A , Saro L , Joo OH , Chapi K . 2012. A GIS-based logistic regression model in rock-fall susceptibility mapping along a mountainous road: Salavat Abad case study, Kurdistan. Nat Hazards. 64(2):1639–1656.10.1007/s11069-012-0321-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirzadi A , Shahabi H , Chapi K , Bui DT , Pham BT , Shahedi K , Ahmad BB . 2017. A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides. Catena. 157:213–226.10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon D . 2008. Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 12(6):702–713.10.1109/TEVC.2008.919004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugeno M , Kang G . 1988. Structure identification of fuzzy model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28(1):15–33.10.1016/0165-0114(88)90113-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS , Lee M-J , Pradhan B , Jebur MN , Lee S . 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 72(10):4001–4015.10.1007/s12665-014-3289-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS , Pradhan B , Jebur MN . 2014. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J Hydrol. 512:332–343.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS , Pradhan B , Jebur MN . 2015. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess. 29(4):1149–1165.10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrany MS , Pradhan B , Mansor S , Ahmad N . 2015. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena. 125:91–101.10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeh SVR , Kornejady A , Pourghasemi HR , Keesstra S . 2018. Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 615:438–451.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieken AH , Apel H , Merz B . 2015. Assessing the probability of large-scale flood loss events: a case study for the river Rhine. J Flood Risk Manage. 8(3):247–262.10.1111/jfr3.2015.8.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G , Guo L . 2013. A novel hybrid bat algorithm with harmony search for global numerical optimization. J Appl Math. 2013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yalcin A , Reis S , Aydinoglu A , Yomralioglu T . 2011. A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon. Catena. 85(3):274–287.10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XS . 2010. A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010). Springer; p. 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Yang XS . 2011. Bat algorithm for multi-objective optimisation. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput. 3(5):267–274.10.1504/IJBIC.2011.042259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XS , Hossein Gandomi A . 2012. Bat algorithm: a novel approach for global engineering optimization. Eng Comput. 29(5):464–483.10.1108/02644401211235834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz S , Kucuksille EU . 2013. Improved bat algorithm (IBA) on continuous optimization problems. Lecture Notes Softw Eng. 1(3):279.10.7763/LNSE.2013.V1.61
   Google Scholar
• Youssef AM , Pradhan B , Sefry SA . 2016. Flash flood susceptibility assessment in Jeddah city (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) using bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci. 75(1):12.10.1007/s12665-015-4830-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh L . 1965. Sets, fuzzy. Inf Control. 8(3):338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA . 1975. Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Synthese. 30(3–4):407–428.10.1007/BF00485052
   Google Scholar
• Zaher H , Ragaa N , Sayed H . 2017. A novel improved bat algorithm for job shop scheduling problem. Int J Appl. 164(5).
   Google Scholar
• Zanardo S , Jewson S , Nicotina L , Hilberts A . 2016. Investigating the relationship between north Atlantic oscillation and flood losses at the European scale. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts.
   Google Scholar