270
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A web service based advanced traveller information system for itinerary planning in an uncertain multimodal network

ORCID Icon
Pages 1553-1569 | Received 28 Sep 2018, Accepted 11 Feb 2019, Published online: 10 Jun 2019

References

  • Avila-Torres P, Caballero R, Litvinchev I, Lopez-Irarragorri F, Vasant P. 2018. The urban transport planning with uncertainty in demand and travel time: a comparison of two defuzzification methods. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 9(3):843–856.
  • Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR, Lerman SR. 1985. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT press .
  • Bhanumurthy V, Shankar GJ, Rao KRM, Nagamani P. 2015. Defining a framework for integration of geospatial technologies for emergency management. Geocarto Int. 30(9):963–983.
  • Bon AT, Utami SF. 2015. An analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy inference system tsukamoto for production planning: A review and conceptual research. Int J Business Econ Develop (IJBED). 3(1):101–111.
  • Braga M, Santos MY, Moreira A. 2014. Integrating public transportation data: creation and editing of gtfs data. In: New perspectives in information systems and technologies, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; p. 53–62.
  • Brito J, Moreno JA, Verdegay JL. 2012. Transport route planning models based on fuzzy approach. Iran J Fuzzy Syst. 9(1):141–158.
  • Campbell PA, Junger JR, Havlicek JP, Stevenson AR, Barnes RD. 2011. Pathfinder: Oklahoma's advanced traveler information system ed. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on IEEE, 402–407.
  • Cao J, Cao X, Zhang C, Huang X. 2016. The gaps in satisfaction with transit services among Brt, metro, and bus riders: evidence from Guangzhou. J Transp Land Use. 9(3):97–109.
  • Chang M-S, Chen H-K. 2000. A fuzzy user-optimal route choice problem using a link-based fuzzy variational inequality formulation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(2):339–345.
  • Chen Y-W, Tzeng G-H. 2001. Using fuzzy integral for evaluating subjectively perceived travel costs in a traffic assignment model. Eur J Oper Res. 130(3):653–664.
  • Chiu DK, Lee OK, Leung H-F, Au EW, Wong MC. 2005. A multi-modal agent based mobile route advisory system for public transport networked. 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38 2005), CD-ROM/Abstracts Proceedings, 3-6 January 2005, Big Island, HI, USA.
  • Daganzo CF, Sheffi Y. 1977. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp Sci. 11(3):253–274.
  • De Borger B, Fosgerau M. 2008. The trade-off between money and travel time: a test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences. J Urban Econ. 64(1):101–115.
  • Dell’olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P. 2011. The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy. 18(1):217–227.
  • Dell’orco M, Teodorovic D. 2009. Data fusion for updating information in modelling drivers’ choice behaviour. Transportmetrica. 5(2):107–123.
  • Di Pace R, Marinelli M, Bifulco GN, Dell M. 2011. Modeling risk perception in atis context through fuzzy logic. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 20:916–926.
  • Díaz L, Granell C, Gould M. 2008. Case study: geospatial processing services for web based hydrological applications. Boston (MA): Springer.
  • Dotoli M, Zgaya H, Russo C, Hammadi S. 2017. A multi-agent advanced traveler information system for optimal trip planning in a co-modal framework. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 18(9):2397–2412.
  • Dotspatial. 2019. Geographic information system library written for.Net [online]. [accessed 2019]. https://github.com/DotSpatial/DotSpatial.
  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G. 2011. A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Policy. 18(1):172–181.
  • Feki MF, Kamoun MA, Hammadi S. 2008. An agent oriented information system for itineraries search using web services compositioned. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2008. SMC 2008. IEEE International Conference on IEEE. p. 1935–1941.
  • Fernandez CG, Khadraoui D, Ayed H, Habbas Z, Alba E. 2009. Distributed approach for solving time-dependent problems in multimodal transport networks. Adv Operat Res. 2009:15.
  • Gao Y. 2011. Shortest path problem with uncertain arc lengths. Comput Math Appl. 62(6):2591–2600.
  • Ghavami SM, Taleai M. 2017. Towards a conceptual multi-agent-based framework to simulate the spatial group decision-making process. J Geogr Syst. 19(2):109–132.
  • Henn V. 2005. What is the meaning of fuzzy costs in fuzzy traffic assignment models? Transport Res Part C: Emerg Technol. 13(2):107–119.
  • Ho W, Ma X. 2017. The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 267:399–414.
  • Hofer B, Mäs S, Brauner J, Bernard L. 2017. Towards a knowledge base to support geoprocessing workflow development. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 31(4):694–716.
  • Hu M, Wang Y, Shi Q. 2002. Developing Beijing traveler information systems frameworked. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2002. Proceedings. The IEEE 5th International Conference on IEEE, p. 381–386.
  • Kem O, Balbo F, Zimmermann A. 2017. Traveler-oriented advanced traveler information system based on dynamic discovery of resources: potentials and challenges. Transport Res Proc. 22:635–644.
  • Kumar P, Singh V, Reddy D. 2005. Advanced traveler information system for Hyderabad city. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 6(1):26–37.
  • Liu H, Ban X, Ran B, Mirchandani P. 2003. Formulation and solution algorithm for fuzzy dynamic traffic assignment model. Transport Res Rec. 1854(1):114–123.
  • Liu K, Xu Y. 2019. Route choice behavior: Understanding the impact of asymmetric preference on travelers’ decision making. Symmetry. 11(1):66.
  • Mahmoud MS. 2018. Basics of fuzzy control. In Fuzzy control, estimation and diagnosis. Switzerland: Springer; p. 15–44.
  • Mamdani EH, Assilian S. 1974. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. IEEE Proc Inst Electr Eng UK. 121:1585–1588.
  • Martins E, Pascoal M. 2000. A new implementation of yen's ranking loopless paths algorithm. Coimbra, Portugal: Springer-Verlag.
  • Miralinaghi M, Lou Y, Hsu YT, Shabanpour R, Shafahi Y. 2016. Multiclass fuzzy user equilibrium with endogenous membership functions and risk‐taking behaviors. J Adv Transp. 50(8):1716–1734.
  • Moraitis P, Petraki E, Spanoudakis NI. 2005. An agent-based system for infomobility serviced. EUMAS, p. 224–235.
  • Moreno A, Perallos A, López-De-Ipiña D, Onieva E, Salaberria I, Masegosa AD. 2015. A novel software architecture for the provision of context-aware semantic transport information. Sensors. 15(6):12299–12322.
  • Nugroho A. 2017. Mobile expert system using fuzzy tsukamoto for diagnosing cattle disease. Proc Comput Sci. 116:27–36.
  • OGC-WPS. 2018. Web processing service [online]. [accessed 2018]. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wps.
  • OGC. 2018. Open geospatial consortium (ogc) [online]. [accessed 2018]. http://www.opengeospatial.org/about.
  • Onlymoov. 2018., Only moov [online]. [accessed 2018].
  • Opentripplanner. 2018. Opentripplanner; multimodal trip planning [online]. [accessed 2018]. http://www.opentripplanner.org/.
  • Pagani A, Bruschi F, Rana V, Restelli M. 2017. User context estimation for public travel assistance and intelligent service schedulinged. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2017. IEEE 20th International Conference on IEEE, p. 1–8.
  • Peng Z-R, Huang R. 2000. Design and development of interactive trip planning for web-based transit information systems. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 8(1–6):409–425.
  • Petit-Rozé C, Grislin-Le Strugeon E. 2006. Mapis, a multi-agent system for information personalization. Inf Softw Technol. 48(2):107–120.
  • Robenek T, Azadeh SS, Maknoon Y, Bierlaire M. 2017. Hybrid cyclicity: combining the benefits of cyclic and non-cyclic timetables. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 75:228–253.
  • Rometorio. 2018. Rome torio [online]. [accessed 2018]. http://www.rome2rio.com/.
  • Rosatti G, Zorzi N, Zugliani D, Piffer S, Rizzi A. 2018. A web service ecosystem for high-quality, cost-effective debris-flow hazard assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software. 100:33–47.
  • Ross T. 2004. Fuzzy logic with engineering. University of New Mexico, USA: Wiley Ltd.
  • Saaty T. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sawant S, Durbha SS, Jagarlapudi A. 2017. Interoperable agro-meteorological observation and analysis platform for precision agriculture: a case study in citrus crop water requirement estimation. Comput Electron Agri. 138:175–187.
  • Schiel U, Baptista CDS, Maia ACDJ, De Andrade FG. 2007. Sei-tur: A system based on composed web-service discovery to support the creation of trip planned. Digital Society, 2007. ICDS'07. First International Conference on the IEEE, p. 28–28.
  • Sci. 2018. Statistical center of Iran [online]. [accessed 2018]. https://www.amar.org.ir/english/.
  • Shen X, Feng S, Li Z, Hu B. 2016. Analysis of bus passenger comfort perception based on passenger load factor and in-vehicle time. Springerplus. 5(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1694-7] [https://doi.org/26839755].
  • Singh H, Karnatak HC, Garg R. 2019. An automated and optimized approach for online spatial biodiversity model: a case study of OGC web processing service. Geocarto Int. 34(2):194–214.
  • Sipahi S, Timor M. 2010. The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Manage Decis. 48(5):775–808.
  • Stasch C, Pross B, Gräler B, Malewski C, Förster C, Jirka S. 2018. Coupling sensor observation services and web processing services for online geoprocessing in water dam monitoring. Int J Digit Earth. 11(1):64–78.
  • Stollberg B, Zipf A. 2008. Geoprocessing services for spatial decision support in the domain of housing market analyses. Proceedings AGILE.
  • Subartini B, Damayanti P, Supian S, Budiono R, Kamarudin M, Ghazali A, Gasim M. 2018. Fuzzy inference system of tsukamoto method in decision making on determination of insurance premium amount for due damages of flood natural disaster. J Fund Appl Sci. 10(1S):79–94.
  • Sugeno M, Kang GT. 1988. Structure identification of fuzzy model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28(1):15–33.
  • Taneja S, Suri B, Gupta S, Narwal H, Jain A, Kathuria A. 2018. A fuzzy logic based approach for data classification. In Data engineering and intelligent computing. Singapore: Springer; p. 605–616. [
  • Teodorović D, Lučić P. 2005. Schedule synchronization in public transit using the fuzzy ant system. Transport Plan Technol. 28(1):47–76.
  • Trafiken. 2018. [online]. [accessed 2018]. https://trafiken.nu/stockholm/.
  • Tran VX, Tsuji H. 2009. Using semantic technologies for dynamic and flexible trip planning. Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, 2009. DEST'09. 3rd IEEE International Conference on IEEE, p. 481–486.
  • Transportforlondon. 2018. [online]. [accessed 2018] https://tfl.gov.uk/.
  • Tsukamoto Y. 1979. An approach to fuzzy reasoning method. Adv Fuzzy Set Theory Appl. 137:149.
  • Turksen I, Tian Y. 1993. Combination of rules or their consequences in fuzzy expert systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 58(1):3–40.
  • Wahyuni I, Mahmudy WF, Iriany A. 2016. Rainfall prediction in Tengger region Indonesia using tsukamoto fuzzy inference system. Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE), International Conference on IEEE, p. 130–135.
  • Wardrop JG. 1952. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic researched. Inst Civil Engineers Proc London/UK/.
  • Wets G, Vanthienen J, Timmermans H. 1998. Modelling decision tables from data. In Research and development in knowledge discovery and data mining. Berlin: Springer; p. 412–413.
  • Wu C-H, Su D-C, Chang J, Wei C-C, Ho J-M, Lin K-J, Lee D. 2003. An advanced traveler information system with emerging network technologies. Proc. 6th Asia-Pacific Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems Forum Citeseer, p. 230–231.
  • Wu L, Ma W, Yang Y, Wang K. 2019. A competitive analysis approach for route choice with uncertain travel times and blocked nodes. J Amb Intell Human Comput. 10(1):345–355.
  • Yoon G, Kim K, Lee K. 2017. Linkage of OGC WPS 2.0 to the e-government standard framework in Korea: an implementation case for geo-spatial image processing. IJGI. 6(1):25.
  • Zadeh LA. 1976. A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts. In Systems theory in the social sciences. Birkhäuser, Basel: Springer; p. 202–282.
  • Zapater JJS, Escrivá DML, García FRS, Durá JJM. 2015. Semantic web service discovery system for road traffic information services. Expert Syst Appl. 42(8):3833–3842.
  • Zhang K, Zhou K, Zhang F. 2014. Evaluating bus transit performance of Chinese cities: developing an overall bus comfort model. Transport Res Part A: Policy Pract. 69:105–112.
  • Zhang Y, Liu P, Yang L, Gao Y. 2015. A bi-objective model for uncertain multi-modal shortest path problems. J Uncertain Anal Appl. 3(1):8.
  • Zhou J, Yang F, Wang K. 2014. An inverse shortest path problem on an uncertain graph. J Netw. 9(9):2353.
  • Zhou J, Yi X, Wang K, Liu J. 2016. Uncertain distribution-minimum spanning tree problem. Int J Unc Fuzz Knowl Based Syst. 24(04):537–560.
  • Ziering E. 2007. Transxml: Xml schemas for exchange of transportation data: Washington (DC): Transportation Research Board.
  • Zimmermann H. 1992. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. 2nd, revised ed. Netherlands: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.